Social Impact Assessment Study of Land Acquisition of Development of Security Zone Around Shree Jagannatha Temple, Puri

SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY OF LAND ACQUISITION OF DEVELOPMENT OF SECURITY ZONE AROUND SHREE JAGANNATHA TEMPLE, PURI

Submitted to

The Coordinator, State SIA Unit Nabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies, Bhubaneswar

Submitted by

CTRAN Consulting Ltd, A1/A2 3rd Floor, Lewis Road, Lewis Plaza, BJB Nagar Bhubaneswar

Contents Abbreviations ...... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 8 Socio Economic Profile of the Project Affected Families ...... 8 Household Perceptions about the Project ...... 9 Expected Social Benefits ...... 9 Expected Social Costs ...... 10 Expected Economic Benefits ...... 10 Expected Economic Costs ...... 10 Expected Cultural Benefits ...... 10 Expected Cultural Costs ...... 11 Expected Environmental Benefits ...... 11 Expected Environmental Costs ...... 11 CHAPTER-I:INTRODUCTION...... 12 1.1 Background ...... 12 1.2 Development of Security Zone around Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri...... 12 1.3 About the Assignment ...... 14 1.4 Scope of the Study ...... 15 1.5 Objectives of the SIA ...... 15 1.6 Social Impact Assessment (SIA): A Brief Conceptualization ...... 15 1.7 The Odisha Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Rules, 2016 ...... 19 1.8 Study Methodology ...... 19 1.9 Team Structure ...... 21 1.10 Definitions Used ...... 21 CHAPTER-II: PURI- A HERITAGE CITY ...... 23 2.1 Religious Significance ...... 23 2.2 Socio-Cultural Significance ...... 24 2.3 Economic significance ...... 26 2.4 Ecological and environmental significance ...... 27 2.5 Security Significance ...... 27 Chapter-III: Socio Economic Condition of the Project Affected Families ...... 30 3.1 Religion and Caste ...... 30 3.2 Family Structure ...... 31

3.3 Family Size ...... 32 3.4 Dwelling Condition ...... 32 3.5 Aspects of housing condition ...... 33 3.6 Marital Status ...... 33 3.7 Educational Qualification ...... 34 3.8 Age Group and Sex Categry ...... 35 3.9 Main Occupation ...... 36 Chapter-4: Assessment of Land Acquisition, Household Awareness about the upcoming project ..... 39 4.1 Assessment of Land Acquisition ...... 39 4.2 Land Acquisition by Kisam of Lands ...... 40 4.3 Loss of Assets as a result of Land Acquisition ...... 41 4.4 Household Awareness...... 43 4.5 Household Willingness ...... 43 4.6 Household Benefits of the project ...... 44 4.7 Likely impacts on livelihoods ...... 44 4.8 Likely Displacement ...... 45 4.9 Loss of present earning ...... 46 4.10 Expected Support from the project ...... 47 4.11 Expected cash compensation...... 48 CHAPTER-5: Expected Impacts of the Project and Social Impact Management Plan ...... 50 5.1 Social Impacts ...... 50 5.2 Economic Impacts ...... 52 5.3 Cultural Impacts ...... 53 5.4 Environmental Impacts ...... 54 Section-2 ...... 55 Social Impacts Management Plan (SIMP) ...... 55 Chapter-6: Proceedings of Public Hearing Meeting ...... 58 Annexure ...... 77 Annexure-I: SIA Notification ...... 78 Annexure-II: R & R Plan ...... 81 Annexure-III: List of Affected Shops...... 82 Annexure-IV: List of Affected Lodges ...... 90 Annexure-V: List of Affected Mathas ...... 92 Annexure-VI: SIA Entitlement Matrix ...... 93

List of Tables:

Table 1: Summary of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in LA, R and R Act, 2013 as applicable ...... 17 Table 2: Land Acquisition as per SIA Notification ...... 20 Table 3: Mouza wise Household coverage ...... 20 Table 4: Mouza wise Planned Land Acquisition (Number of plots) ...... 20 Table 5: Number of Families by Religion and Caste ...... 31 Table 6: Number of families on the basis of type of family ...... 31 Table 7: Average Male members per household ...... 32 Table 8: Current dwelling Condition ...... 32 Table 9: Number of families on the basis of housing amenities ...... 33 Table 10: Number of families on the basis of marital status ...... 34 Table 11: Educational Background of household members ...... 35 Table 12: Age Group and Sex Category of household members ...... 35 Table 13: Household Main Occupation ...... 37 Table 14: Amount of Land under Acquisition and the incidence of PAFs ...... 40 Table 15: Kisam wise lands planned for acquisition ...... 41 Table 16: Assets Categories on to be acquired land ...... 41 Table 17: Awareness about the upcoming project among the PAFs ...... 43 Table 18: Household willingness to cooperate in the land acquisition Process ...... 43 Table 19: No of families think that project is beneficial at household level ...... 44 Table 20: Household opinion on adverse impacts of the project on Livelihoods ...... 45 Table 21: Nature of ownership of the affected property and likely displacement ...... 45 Table 22: Extent of loss of current income ...... 47 Table 23: Assistance Option desired by the PAFs ...... 48 Table 24: Likely Social Impacts of the upcoming Project ...... 50 Table 25: Likely Economic Impacts of the Project ...... 52 Table 26: Likely Cultural Impacts of the Project ...... 53 Table 27: Likely Environmental Impacts ...... 54 Table 28: Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) matrix ...... 55

List of Figures:

Figure 1: Social Structure of Households (%) ...... 30 Figure 2: Type of Family structure of the PAHs (% Share) ...... 31 Figure 3: % of household members of Project Affected Househols ...... 33 Figure 4: % of Household Members ...... 34 Figure 5: Household Main Occupation (% Share) ...... 36 Figure 6: Average Annual Income (Rs.) ...... 37 Figure 7: Acquired Private Land Per PAF ...... 39 Figure 8: HH willingness to cooperate in land acquisition process and anticipated positive outcomes of the project (% of Households) ...... 44 Figure 9: Extent of loss of current income (% of Households) ...... 46 Figure 10: Assistance Options (% of Households) ...... 47

Abbreviations

AD Anno Domini ADG Additional Director General BCE Before Christian Era CCTV Close Circuit Television CE Christian Era EWS Economically Weaker Section FGDs Focus Group Discussions HH Household HM Hizbul Mujahideen JeM Jaish-e-Mohammad JuD Jamaat-ud-Dawa LeT Lashkar-e-Toewba NCDS Nabakrushna Choudhury Centre for Development Studies NGO Non-Government Organizations OBC Other Backward Caste PAFs Project Affected Families PNFs Project Non-Affected Families PSUs Public Sector Undertakings R & R Plan Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan RFCTLARR Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement SC Scheduled Caste SIA Social Impact Assessment SIMP Social Impact Management Plan SRS Simple Random Sampling

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CTRAN Consulting Ltd, Bhubaneswar through The SIA unit, NCDS, Bhubaneswar has been assigned the task of conducting Social Impact Assessment Study for acquisition of 15.651 acres of land in the mouza of BaseliSahi, ChudangaSahi, DolaMandapSahi-I, KalikadeviSahi, and ManikarnikaSahi.The SIA study undertook complete enumeration survey of the entire project affected families who are directly losing their land for the said projects. These families are spread in all directions within 75 metres radius of the main compound (MegahanadPacheri) of Jagannath temple. Apart from it, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were also conducted in all the five Mouzas separately to gather qualitative information pertaining to SIA study.This is to note that in the 75-metre zone, there are 373 numbers of plots consisting of 70 Government plots, 111 plots, and 192 private plots coming under five Mouzas.

Socio Economic Profile of the Project Affected Families All of the project affected families are Hindus by religion. With respect to caste structure predominantly the PAFs are in General and OBC categories of families.In family structure the percentage share of joint and nuclear families stands at 48.2 and 51.8 percent respectively.In joint families, in an average, there are seven members per household as against the same at three persons for nuclear families.Majority of families to the extent of 98.0 percent live in their own houses and remaining 2 percent of the families live in rented accommodations.Out of the total 431 families living in their own houses, 301 household dwelling units, about 69.8 percent have constructed houses on their own lands. About 93 percent have bathrooms and toilets in their houses. About 98.3 percent of families have electricity connections in their houses. About 89.3 percent of families use piped water supply for their household uses and remaining 9.8 percent of the families depend on borewells and tube wells for their household water uses. In respect of educational qualifications majority of household members to the extent of 30.2 percent have upto primary level followed by upto secondary level of education (27.2%), Graduation (19.2%), higher secondary /intermediate (15.2%), post graduate (4.7%) and other professional courses (3.5%). Household main occupation is more skewed in favor of business and about 82.8 percent of the PAFs derive their main income from business. This is followed by temple priests/ sevayats. About 10.4

percent of the PAFs derive their main income by working as priests/ Sevayats in Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri.The average annual household income is calculated at Rs.429658.00.

Household Perceptions about the Project About 98.2 percent of the PAFs are aware about the project. It is viewed that project activities are being carried out in a transparent manner and project authorities have undertaken all possible ways to publicise the project. Significantly, the majority of PAFs are willing to participate in the land acquisition process being planned under this project. Major livelihood issues arise because of loss of shopping space, lodging spaces, structures being used for renting out pilgrims and possible displacement. Maximum proportion of PAFs to the extent of 47.7 percent of overall families covering all mouzas will incur loss upto 80-100 percent of their present income, whereas about 18.8 percent will lose current income between the range 40-60 percent and remaining 17.7 percent in the range of 20-40 percent. Expected Social Benefits • Due to the creation of heritage security zone, the splendor and majestic beauty of the Temple would be enhanced and visitors can get a glimpse and enjoy the beauty from a far distance. • Safety and security of tourists and pilgrims will be better assured. Previously, various monasteries were using adequate space for other than religious activities. Beyond that, anti- social elements were akin to forcefully encroach the space of monasteries to accomplish foul play. • The upcoming project is aiming at conservation of the deities of the monasteries. As a result, tourists will get chances to visit the monasteries’ deities during their circumnavigating the Shree Jagannath temple. • Tourists will get a chance to view antique properties associated with different religious monasteries, if preserved in a planned museum. • As a result of security zone project, the chances of stampedes like previously taken place during special festivals of Shree Jagannath temple can be completely averted. • Due to such type of project, there could be traffic control in a more planned and organized manner. • Ambulance and fire service vehicles in all exigent situations can move smoothly around Shree Jagannath temple. • The unnecessary rush around Shree Jagannath Temple as a result of existing unplanned business activities would be prevented. • Planned development as envisioned under the project will enhance the heritage value of the city. • Anti-social and unscrupulous people living in different unauthorized locations near to Shree Jagannath Temple area, would be eliminated. • As it is mentioned in the project concept note, due to the emergence of security zone project, the terrorists’ activities could be detected much in advance through installation of different surveillance devices around Shree Jagannath temple. Besides positioning of special

terrorist prevention squads to safeguard the temple can be easily accomplished as and when any emergency arises. • There is large congregation inside the temple everyday during the time of flag changing rituals, now the devotees can view the flag changing rituals clearly sitting from outside the temple. • Problem occurs due to lack of space during “Bahuda” will be overcome by getting space near EmarMathaChokada. • Queue system for devotees at the time of large congregation can be effectively managed by getting large space around the temple. Expected Social Costs • Some of the Monasteries as explained by their Mahantas were affected by the “Security Project”. they should be well compensated and suitably rehabilitated. Their inmates should also be provided with Vedic and Sanskrit education free of cost. • “Gosalas” currently functioning in some of the monasteries are likely to face inconveniencies as they explained. So, alternative arrangements for “Gosalas” should be expeditiously functional. Expected Economic Benefits • As a result of beautification and cleanliness around Shree Jagannath temple, there shall be more tourists’ footfall and consequently there will be more generation of income for the families engaged as tourists’-based service providers. • It is viewed that the new market complex planned as a part of heritage conservation project will be one of the suitable and hassle-free marketing places in the city by which sellers as well as buyers would be benefitted immensely. • There will be more Income generation and economic condition of local business man, Bojhias, Sebaks will increase due to more inflow of devotees. • Distribution of Mahaprasad shall be made in a planned & hygienic manner. • Promotion and products done by local artisans will improve due to inflow of more tourists. • Provision of shoes stand/Locker facility by getting space around temple for devotees will solve the long-standing issues of devotees. Expected Economic Costs • Due to dismantling of lodges in the 75 metre zone, there may be shortage of lodging space in the short run until all lodges get fully restructured at alternative places as briefed by the local Public. • The owners of the lodge should be well compensated for the building as well as land. Besides, space for reconstruction of lodges should be provided. • The proposal for construction of pilgrim shelters nearest to the Jagannath Temple should also be planned by the Government.

Expected Cultural Benefits • The main boundary Wall of Shree Jagannath temple (MeghanadPachery), would be more visible to the public and pilgrims which was not previously eye-catching to them.

• The historical importance and cultural significance of MeghanadPacheri would be realized by the visitors through seeing its artistic majesty, grandeur beauty and gigantic structure. • Owing to more area around Shree Jaganath temple, tourists and pilgrims can spend more quality time which was not possible previously due to congestion and heavy crowd. • Due to more open and free space around Shree Jagannath temple, cultural programme like “Bhajan Sandyas”, “Odishi Dance” etc. on special festivals could be better celebrated. • Toilet, drainage facility for devotees will improve the hygienic condition around the temple area. Expected Cultural Costs • Ritual based head shavings are done outside the temple premises from western as well as southern sides. • Till getting alternative places for the said purpose, there may be temporary inconveniencies. • There should be provision for the creation of a separate venue for this purpose. • There should also be facilities like water and sitting arrangements. Expected Environmental Benefits • The project emphasizes dedicated Solid Waste Management Plan which would help to get rid of unhygienic situation in the vicinity of temple area. • Apart from it, there will not be water logging around temple areas. • Due to the upcoming project, there would be more cleanliness around Shree Jagannatha Temple, Puri. • The outsiders’ impressions with regard to the cleanliness in the vicinity of Shree Jagannath temple would be better promoted. • Due to possible decongestion around the temple area as a result of the coming project, people will feel relaxed at the temple area. Expected Environmental Costs • After 75-meter security zone, and consequently to be built up concrete area is expected to emit more heat in temple surroundings, as pointed out by the local inhabitants. • It is proposed that there should be mini plantations with mini park as well as eco-friendly and tourist-friendly facilities should be created which will be a better environment conservation practice in the iconic city,Puri.

CHAPTER-I:INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Since time immemorial, Shree Shree Jagannath Mahaprabhu is being worshipped by millions of devotees every year at the Shree Jagannath temple, a monumental and magnificent shrine at Puri, Odisha and the place is considered of great historical, social, cultural, spiritual and religious significance by the people from many parts of the world for generations after generations. The temple was built by a famous king of Ganga Dynasty Ananta Varman Chodaganga Deva dating back to 12th century. Adi Sankaracharya (9th century AD), the great profounder of the Aditvavada, sanctified the place by establishing a monastery called GobardhanMatha. Subsequently, several saints and philosophers, like Ramanuja (12th century AD), Madhavatirtha (13th century AD), Naraharitirtha, Sankaradeva, Nanak, Kabir, Chaitanya, Ballav Bhatta, Ramachandra Puri, ParamanandaPuri visited and further sanctified the place through their preaching and left their imprints in the monasteries and ashramas that they established. Recorded history reveals that from the time of the Somavamsis (11th century AD), all ruling dynasties have extended liberal patronage for the growth and development of this area. As per Hindu traditions, it is one of the four religious Dhams (holiest of holy places), and other dhamsinclude Dwarika, Badrinath &Rameswar. Number of festivals like Snana Yatra, Netrotsava, Ratha Yatra (car festival), SayanEkadasi, ChitalagiAmabasya, SrikrushnaJanma, Dussehra etc. is observed in the temple. However, the most important annual festival is the World famous Rath Yatra (Car Festival) &Bahuda Yatra. A large crowd gather to witness Lord Jagannath during this festival. Apart from these festivals, special festivals like Nabakalebar and Nagarjuna Besa etc are organized every few years’ intervals. Keeping in view, the tourist’s footfall pressures in the temples on special occasions and to broaden the security base of the temple, an ambitious project of “Development of Security Zone around Shree Jagannath Temple” is being undertaken by the Govt. of Odisha.

1.2 Development of Security Zone around Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri.

The project “Development of Security Zone around Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri” also called “Heritage Security Zone” is being implemented by Govt. of Odisha as per one of the recommendations of Justice Bimal Prasad Das Commission of enquiry for better administration and governance of Shree Jagannath temple and its endowments, which was constituted in the year 2016 for better administration and Governance of the Shree Jaganath Temple in Puri. Out of several recommendations made by the commission, development of 75 metre security zone from the main

compound (MegahnadaBoundary) in all sides of the temple is of utmost importance for the security of the temple it was one of the key strategic recommendations.1 This zone is also having the vision

to accommodate idols of gods and demigods, plants and shrubs linked to the Jagannath cult, art and artefacts and a place of offerings with further beautification within the buffer zone. The project is also having the aim at utilising some land on the vicinity of Emaar Mutt for a new building to house Raghunandan Library. Raghunandan Library is to be developed with heritage architecture. This place is to be a centre on research on Jagannath culture.2 Heritage Security Zone is a part of the broader Heritage city Project which also covers Shree Setu Project from Bypass Road to Jagannath Ballav Mutt and Musa River Revival Plan and Housing Projects for those affected by the Development of Puri.3 Earlier in this direction, the State Government of Odisha had launched Augmentation of Basic Amenities and Development of Heritage and Architecture (ABADHA) Scheme in 2017-18 with

1https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/odisha-govt-announces-rehabilitation- resettlement-package-for-displaced-people-in-puri20190902205106/ 2https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhubaneswar/naveen-patnaik-approves-3-more-projects- for-puri-worth-rs-120-crore/articleshow/70998879.cms 3https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/odisha-navin-patnaik-announces-rs-500- crore-to-develop-puri-as-world-heritage-city20190823141550/

theobjective of providing better and affordable services to pilgrims and tourists and to protect the shrine from all possible threats and to ensure safety and security to pilgrims.4

It is in this background, to materialize the project, all structures falling under this zone are planned to be cleared by acquiring lands under public and private ownership as per the provisions of RFCTLAR & R Act, 2013. Some of the structures like “Emar Matha” which are not properly maintained and not secured for any type of use are already demolished under the said development project. Comprehensive Development Plan -PKDA 2031 also remarks on some of these issues- Majority of Mathas are poorly maintained and not having adequate infrastructure which needs to be upgraded and redeveloped to revive heritage value. The various heritage structures are not linked with each other not leading to an integrated heritage package for tourists. There is very little information about many structures available for tourists due to lack of promotional activities. Ill- defined activities in the heritage sites reducing the cultural values in the sites. Many of the open spaces inside the Akhadas and Mathas are now-a-days used by anti-socials during normal season which must be taken care of for safe tourist site development. Overall investment and institutional structure must be developed for regeneration of these heritage sites which is currently missing.5

1.3 About the Assignment

The SIA unit, NCDS, Bhubaneswar has assigned the task of conducting Social Impact Assessment Study for acquisition of 15.651 acres of landforland “Development of Security Zone around Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri”. The streets are BaseliSahi, ChudangaSahi, DolaMandapSahi-I, KalikadeviSahi, and ManikarnikaSahi.Accordingly, SIA has been conducted among 440 project affected families. 6 The notification pertaining to the said SIA study came out on 24th September 2019.7 Team of researchers from CTRAN were mobilized by NCDS for this exercise.

4http://www.uniindia.com/odisha-cabinet-approves-rs-3208-crore-projects-for-puri-under-abadha- scheme/east/news/1766090.html 5 CEPT, Comprehensive Development Plan, PP 56-57 6 NCDS official Letter, SIA-436/ NCDS dated 20.09.2019 7 No- RDM-LAA-Puri-0004-2019 R &DM, dated 24 Sept 2019.

1.4 Scope of the Study

Assessment of type Costs and Benefits Organizing Primary of losses suffered of the project as well as by the Affected (Social, Cultural, Secondary Data Families Economic and Environmental)

Socio Economic and Estimation of the Preparation of SIA Cultural Profile of Affected Families Report the Affected Area

1.5 Objectives of the SIA

The broad objectives of the study are as per the following.

→ To assess whether the proposed land acquisition serves public purpose. → To assess the number of affected families, magnitude of loss of land assets based on the actual holdings of the families, magnitude of loss of land holdings, extent of displacement of families in terms of physical displacement and occupational displacement. → To assess the type of lands-public and private, house settlements and other common properties likely to be affected by the proposed acquisition. → To examine whether the proposed land acquisition is bare minimum necessity for commissioning the proposed project. → To study the socio-economic, cultural and environmental impacts of the project by covering both direct land loser families as well as indirectly affected families. → To suggest remedial intervention measures by designing appropriate policies and programmes through SIMP and Mitigation Plan.

1.6 Social Impact Assessment (SIA): A Brief Conceptualization

In India, SIAs are mandated by The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR, 2013). Prior to this law, land acquisition was controlled by the Land Acquisition Act of 1894, passed when India was still a colony.

• According to the 2013 land acquisition law, any major development project is required to conduct an SIA within six months of the project’s start date. The study must be publicly displayed and available in the local language (beyond India’s two official languages, English and Hindi, there are many sub-national languages). For projects that involve land acquisitions, developers need to acquire consent for a majority of local landowners: consent from 80 percent of affected landowners is required for private projects, and consent from 70 percent is required for public-private partnership projects.

• There were two important reasons behind the passing of the land acquisition law in 2013: to decrease social unrest over uncompensated land acquisition and to speed up the execution of development projects. Through mandating SIAs, the government sought to ensure that locals receive proper resettlement packages and that developers constructively engage with local communities.

• Social Impacts are the changes that occur in communities or to individuals as a result of an externally-induced change. Changes may affect: employment, income, production, way of life, culture, community, political systems, environment, health and well-being, personal and property rights, and fears and aspirations. These impacts can be positive or negative. In short, a social impact is a significant improvement or deterioration in people’s well-being. • Projects affect different groups differently. Some people tend to benefit, others lose. Often, impacts are particularly severe for vulnerable groups: tribal people, women-headed families, elderly persons, landless persons, and the poor. • An Initial Social Impact Assessment (ISIA) is carried out if the project impacts are likely to be minor or limited, which can be easily predicted and evaluated, and for which mitigation measures can also be prescribed easily. Generally, information for ISIA is obtained during a field visit to areas that will be affected by the project and through discussions with people whom it may affect positively or otherwise. • The SIA is also done to confirm whether this indeed requires a full-scale Social Impact Assessment (SIA). Usually a comprehensive SIA is required for large projects, which entails a more detailed study, time, and resources. The World Bank, ADB, IFC, UNDP, as well as most multilateral and private agencies, including commercial banks, require some kind of prior social impact assessment for all the projects that they finance. However, the issue is no longer whether SIA should be carried out or not, but how it should be carried out so that the local people benefit from the project and not lose from it. • As per “The Right to Fair Compensation and transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Odisha Rules, social impact assessment and public hearing are mandatory for any land to be acquired by the government for a public purpose. For this purpose, as the case may be, SIAs are to be done in consultation with Gram Panchayat, the Ward or village level. • Further to note that the notification issued by the appropriate Government for commitment of consultation and the Social Impact Assessment (SIA) study shall be made available in the local language and uploaded on the website.

• The appropriate Government shall ensure that adequate representation has been given to the representatives of Gram Panchayat, Gram Sabha as the case may be at the state of carrying out the social impact assessment study.

Table 1: Summary of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in LA, R and R Act, 2013 as applicable

Sl. Section Description of the Section • Social Impact Assessment Study 1. Section 4(1) - SIA notification • Total duration 6 months 2. Section 5 • Public Hearing for SIA final report 3. Section 6 (1) • Publication of SIA Study report including SIMP • SIA by Expert Group • 2 non official social scientist, 2 representatives of Panchayat, Gram Sabha, 2 experts on Section 7(1) – SIA Report for 4. rehabilitation and 1 technical expert in subject evaluation by expert group area • Publication of recommendation • Total duration 2 months • Examination of proposals for land acquisition and 5. Section 8 Social Impact Assessment Report by appropriate Government Section 11(1) - Notice to acquire • Publication of Preliminary Notification for land 6. land acquisition Section 11 (5) – Land record 7. • Updating Land records duration 2 months Updation • If Section 11(1) not published within 12 months (18months from the date of 4(1) notification) Section 14- Action to be taken after the submission of SIA report under section 8. on SIA lapse period 7, such report will lapse. Then fresh SIA to be done before acquisition under section 11. • Appropriate government shall have the power to extend the period of 12 months Section 15(1) - Hearing of 9. • Within 60 days from the date of 11(1) notification objections Section 16( 1) - Preparation of R&R Scheme by Administrator (by Government of Odisha) • After the publication of 11(1) notification by of notification not below the rank R&R Scheme by Administrator (by Government of 10. of Dy. Collector or equivalent Odisha), Administrator for R&R shall conduct official of Revenue Department census survey of affected families. to be .the Administrator for R&R) Collector 11. Section 16(5) • Public hearing of R&R Scheme 12. Section 16(6) • Submission of draft R&R scheme to Collector • Review of R&R scheme by Collector with R&R 13. Section 17(1) committee 18 14. Section 18 - Approval of R&R • Officer off the rank of Commissioner or Secretary

Sl. Section Description of the Section scheme by Commissioner to the Government of Odisha Section 19(1) – Publication of • To be published within a period of 12 months 15 declaration and summary of from the notification under section 11 (1) R&R excluding stay or court order • If no declaration is made within 12 months from Section 19(7) - Lapse of 16. the notification under section 11 ( 1) excluding notification under section 11(1 stay or court order 17. Section 21(1) • Notice to person interested for taking possession. 18. Section 23 • Land Acquisition Award by Collector • Award to be made within 12 months from the Section 25 - Lapse of entire date of declaration under section 19. 19. proceeding for acquisition • Government of Odisha shall have the power to extend the period with justification. • Determination of the market value land by 20. Section 26 Collector • Collector will determine the work of 21. Section 27 compensation to the land owner • Determination of value of things attached to land 22. Section 29 or building • R&R award by Collector • Collector shall take possession after ensuring 100% compensation payment and R&R 23. Section 31(1) entitlement or • Tendered within a period of 3 months for Compensation and 6 months for R&R entitlements. • Power to take possession of land to be acquired 24. Section 38(1) by Collector • R&R process to be completed in all respect before 25. Section 38(2) displacing the PAFs. • Formulation, Execution and monitoring of R&R scheme shall vest in the Administrator under the 26 Section 43(3) direction and control of Government of Odisha and Commissioner R&R. 27 Section 44(1) • Appointment of R&R Commissioner • Commissioner will be responsible for supervising 28 Section 44(2) the formulation of R&R schemes or plans and proper implementation of such schemes or plans. • Commissioner shall be responsible for post 29 Section 44(3) implementation social audit in consultation with Gram Sabha in Rural areas. Section 45(1) Composition Of • Chairman (Collector) R&R committee: (acquisition of • Women representative residing in affected area 30 equal to or more than 100 acres • Representative of ST & SC residing in the affected of land) area • Representative of NGO working in the area

Sl. Section Description of the Section • Representative of Nationalized bank • Land Acquisition Officer of the project. • Chairpersons of the Panchayats or municipalities located in the affected area or their nominees. • Chairperson of the District Planning Committee or his nominee. • MP and MLA of the concerned area or their nominees. • Representative of the requiring body. • Administrator for R&R as member-convener.

1.7 The Odisha Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Rules, 2016

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub- section (1) of → Rule 6: 6:Constitution Constitution of of the the State State Social Social Impact Section 109 of the Right to Fair Assessment (SIA) unit Compensation and Transparency → Rule 8: State Government to rectify for carrying out SIA in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation study. and Resettlement Act, 2013 the → Rule 9:9:conducting Conducting of of thethe SIASIA studystudy inin consultation with Government of Odisha has the concerned Panchayats/ wordswards.. framed “The Odisha Right to Fair → Rule 10:Selection10: Selection of of the the SIA SIA Team Team Compensation and Transparency → Rule 11: Process of conducting SIA in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation → Rule 12: SIMP to including R&R Entitlement matrix and Resettlement Rules, 2016” → Rule 17: SIMP to include Development plan in case of (Rules 2016). The State acquisition on scheduled areas Government has established → Rule 14: 14:Process Process ofof conductingconducting PublicPublic hearinghearing in Gram NCDS an independent Sabhas on the findings of SIA organization as the State SIA Unit → Rule 15: Publications of SIA Report and SIMP which is responsible for ensuring that the SIA study is conducted as per the provisions of the Act. The SIA Unit has to engage an agency or individual to conduct the study. Summary of RFCTLARR Act, 2013, Odisha rules, 2016 is furnished in the box given alongside.

1.8 Study Methodology With the objective of “Development of Security Zone around Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri”, it is planned to acquire 15.651 acres of land under private as well as Govt. ownership. The SIA study undertook complete enumeration survey of all the project affected families who are directly losing their land for the said projects. Altogether there are 440 directly project affected families(PAFs) covered under the SIA by following ‘Complete Enumeration Survey’ of all the project affected

families. These families are spread in all directions within 75 metres radius of the main compound (Megahanad Pacheri) of Jagannath temple. There are five Mouzas which include BaseliSahi, ChudangaSahi, DolamandapSahi No-1, KalikadeviSahi and ManikarnikaSahi within the 75 metres jurisdiction from MeghanadPacheri. The details of the families covered under the SIA study, is as per the following table. For the purpose of the SIA study, Household survey was undertaken for all the PAFs. Apart from it, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were also conducted in all the five streets separately to gather qualitative information pertaining to SIA study.This is to note that there are 373 numbers of plots consisting of 70 Government plots, 111 plots, and 192 private plots coming under five Mouzas as shown in Table-3. The details of public hearing meeting are incorporated in the report after preparing the proceedings of the Public Haering Meeting held on 9th October 2020.

Table 2: Land Acquisition as per SIA Notification

Area as per SIA Notification Additional area acquired Sl. Grand Private Govt. Total Private Govt. Total No Name of Mouza Total Land Land Land Land Land Land 1 BaseliSahi 3.028 0.64 3.668 0.304 0.0 0.304 3.972 2 ManikarnikaSahi 3.627 0.133 3.76 0.008 0.0 0.008 3.768 3 KalikadeviSahi 1.951 0.52 2.471 0 0.0 0.0 2.471 4 DolamandapaSahi 0.077 0.074 0.151 0 0.0 0.0 0.151 5 ChudangaSahi 3.8615 1.28 5.1415 0.1475 0.0 0.1475 5.289 Total 12.5445 2.647 15.1915 0.4595 0.0 0.4595 15.6510

Table 3: Mouza wise Household coverage

Sl.No Name of Mouza Project Affected Families (PAFs)

1 BaseliSahi 198 2 ManikarnikaSahi 96 3 KalikadeviSahi 16 4 DolamandapaSahi 14 5 ChudangaSahi 116 Total 440

Table 4: Mouza wise Planned Land Acquisition (Number of plots)

No. of Plots Sl.No Streets/ Mouza Shree Jagannath Government Private Total Mahaprabhu 1 BaseliSahi 17 11 139 167 2 ChudangaSahi 37 30 19 86 3 DolamandapSahi 1 13 1 15 4 KalikadeviSahi 8 18 0 26 5 ManikarnikaSahi 7 39 33 79 Total 70 111 192 373

1.9 Team Structure

Mr Sankarshan Patra, GIS Expert- Mr Sarat Ku Pradhan, Mr Sunil cum- Field Manager Kumar Mishra, Mr Manoj Ku. S. Goswami, Mr Sujit Kumar Mohanty (Research Investigators)

Dr Radhakrushna Mr Upendra Kumar Panda, Field Mr Tapas Ku. Kandi, Mr Satya Ranjan Panda, Team Manager Sahoo, Mr Tapas Ku Barik, Mr Leader Biswaranjan Das (Research Investigators)

Mr Maguni Charan Sahu, Field Mr Pravat Ku. Das, Mr Debadutta Manager Sahu, Mr Biswambar Praharaj, Mr Satyabratta Nayak (Reserach Investigators)

1.10 Definitions Used

The following terms, words and phrases have been referred to and used in this SIA study to design SIA report including SIMP and entitlement frame-work, though, some of the terms are indicated in the Act and Rules. For the purpose of relevance and importance all relevant definitions, words, terms and phrases are furnished below.

→ Act means the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. → Acquisition of lands means the land(s) proposed to be acquired under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for the MGR and CBS and under the prevailing Rules and Orders framed by Government of Odisha. → Administrator means an officer appointed for the purpose of rehabilitation and resettlement of affected families under sub-section (1) of section 43 of the Act. → Affected Area means such area as notified by the Government of Odisha under the relevant land acquisition Acts for the purposes of land acquisition for the Project; → Affected family including project affected family that means a family whose land or other immovable property has been acquired for the purpose of the said development project. → Compensation refers to the amount paid as compensation under various provisions of the Act 2013, for private property, structures and other assets acquired for the project,

excluding rehabilitation and resettlement entitlements as per this policy. → Cost of acquisitionmeans and includes (i) amount of compensation, (ii) demurrage (iii) cost of land and building for settlement displaced or adversely affected families, (iv) cost of development of infrastructure and amenities at the resettlement areas, (v) cost of R&R, (vi) administrative cost and (vii) cost of undertaking the SIA study. → Cut- off Date is the date of Notification under Section 11(1) of Act, 2013. → Displaced Family means any affected family, who on account of the proposed acquisition of land has to be relocated from the affected area; a family whose primary place of residence or other property or source of livelihood is adversely affected by the acquisition of land for the Project any tenure holder, tenant, lessee or owner of other property, who on account of the proposed acquisition of land in the affected area, has been involuntarily displaced from such land or other property; any agricultural or non-agricultural labourer, landless person (not having homestead land or agricultural land) rural artisan, small trader or self-employed person; who has been residing or engaged in any trade, business, occupation or vocation in the acquired land, and who has been deprived of earning his livelihood or alienated wholly or substantially from the main source of his trade, business, occupation or vocation because of the proposed acquisition of land in the affected area. → Land acquisition means acquisition of land under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition. Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 or any other prevailing Government of Odisha Rules and Orders. → Landless means the landless person as defined in the Odisha Prevention of Land EncroachmentAct1972. → Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) means carrying out rehabilitation and resettlement as per Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 or as per any other law in force as may be applicable for rehabilitation and resettlement benefits to be provided to the affected families. → R&R Entitlementsmeans the benefits awarded as per the R&R Framework given in the Policy on Rehabilitation & Resettlement and as subsequently approved by the Government of Odisha.

CHAPTER-II: PURI- A HERITAGE CITY

Shree Jaganath Temple, Puri is widely believed as an iconic heritage of the whole world. Its historical and architectural antiquities, religious sanctuaries, rich culture, colourful social life, architectural grandeur etc put the place under grand heritage.A number of references about this heritage site are found in the Puranas and other ancient scriptures indicating the existence and importance of Puri as early as the 4th Century C.E. The ancient port of Puri was a prominent participant in the maritime trading activity that occurred in the Eastern coast of India from the 3rd century B. C.E. to the 3rd century C.E. During the 7th and 8th centuries, Puri also served as a provincial outpost that linked Eastern India with South India. After the establishment of the Jagannatha Temple in 12th century C.E., the spiritual facets of Puri were revitalized and gained supremacy as centre of pilgrimage. The place is also known as ‘Srikshetra’, Jagannath Puri situated on the beach of ‘Mahodadhi’, Bay of Bengal. It is one of the seven most holy places for Hindus in India. The other places being Ayodhya, Mathura, Gaya, Kasi, Kanchi, Avantika, Puri, and Dvaravati.8 Sustaining the rich heritage of the city is very much important in view of its socio-cultural, economic and environmental significance.

2.1 Religious Significance

The place is believed to be the confluence of major religions. Owing to its religious association with Sankaracharya, Puri became one of the centres for the practice of reformed Hinduism in the 8th Century.9In legends, it is connected to the epic Mahabharata. When funeral fires failed to consume Krishna’s dead body, then directed by the Gods of heaven, Arjuna placed the body on sea. Floating in the form of a log, the body travelled for thousands of years from Dwarka on the Western Coast to the Eastern shores of the country, where it was found by Indradyumna, King of

8 Odisha District Gazetteers, Puri 9 IPE Global, “City Hriday Plan”

Malava.10The place is also mentioned as “PurussottamKshetra” in Rig-Veda. The soul of living heritage of Puri culture is Lord Jagannath, the presiding deity of Sri Mandir or Jagannath Temple.

Mythologically, the city is believed to have been planned in the shape of conch or “Sankhakshetra‟. This area is about five Koshas (10 miles) in extent of which nearly two koshas are submerged in the sea. In the centre of the khetra lies Jagannath temple on a hillock called Nilagiri with eight Shiva temples guarding the eight quarters radiating from it the hillocks called Nilagiri. Bada Danda connecting to Sri Gundicha Temple forms the Spine of the shankha. The broad end of the Sahnkakshetra lies to the west where the temple of Loknath is located and on the apical end or tail end in the east is located the temple of Nilakantha.11Puri the major urban centre is more than thousand years old and is a religious town. The town is based on Vaastu Purusha Mandala with many meta-physical aspects interwoven in the planning of the town.

The city with its 3km. long Grand Road (Badadanda), 7 km. long Beach front, ancient lanes and by lanes with sacred tanks like Sweta Ganga, Markandeya, Narendra and Indradyumna shows the characteristics of a Tirtha Kshetra. The ancient Saivite temples such as Jameswara, Lokanatha and Kapalamochana form the inner circle of the Sankha Kshetra. The Vaisnavite temples such as Yagnya Narasimha, Gundicha Temple, Chakra Narayana, Chakra Narasimha, SunarGouranga and Tota Gopinath are also located in the strategic places of the Sankha Kshetra. As a great Sakti Pitha the city has the temples of Dakhina Kali, Shyama Kali, Ramachandi, Marichi, Ardhasini and many others. Besides, there are a number of Mathas and Ashramas spread over the city. All these temples and monuments are part of the heritage components, which uphold the long tradition of Hindu culture. All these monuments and temples are regarded as great heritage sites.

2.2 Socio-Cultural Significance

Puri and Lord Jagannath manifest a confluence of cultures. Puri is a city of heritage and its unique identity is associated with Lord Jagannath (Lord of the Universe). It is the place where amalgamation of many cultures, traditions can be seen. The origin of the term Lord Jagannath and Puri Jagannath Dham is attributed to the Vedas (an oral tradition12) and later to Ramayan and Mahabharat (written tradition). While the current temple which has been reconstructed by King Ananga Bhima Deva of Ganga Dynasty is believed to be around 12th Century (1197)13, the earlier temple constructed by Lord Indradyumna is believed to be much older (more than 3000 years old). Claiming its origin from the worshipping tribes (sabar), it has linkages to Budhhism (Jagannath is considered Bhairav as per the Buddhist tradition) and the chariot celebration that figure in the write up Fa Hien (though Mahabharat and Ramayan have description of Chariots as well), to Jainism (King Kharvelacontributing to the development of the area14). It also has several inscriptions to link the

10Puri City Development Plan, 2006, Evolution of Puri Town, p.12. 11Puri City Development Plan 2006, Evolution of Puri Town, p. 13. 12 Acharya Sayan’s commentaries in the Rig Vedas 13Inscription in Sri Mandir as described in Jagnnath Tatwa Ratnabali 14As per the analysis of Pandit Nilakantha Das, King Kharvel who is a Jain was involved in the temple and area development.

place to Saivaite tradition (Jagannath MahaBhairav), Shakta Tradition (Goddess Vimala acting as Bhairavi and Goddess Subhadra as parashakti), Ganapatya and Sourya Traditions. After the Bhakti Movement, this place has a dominant Vaishnavite hue. Puri is one of the four famous Dhams, others being Badrinath in the North, Dwaraka in the West and Rameswaram in the South. It was recognized by Adi Shankaracharya as one of the eminent places of pilgrimage in the eighth century A.D. Puri assumed more and more importance as great Vaishnava Acharyas like Sri Ramanuja, Sri Vishnuswami, Sri Nimbark and Sri Madhavacharya visited this place. Subsequently, it was also visited by great saints of various religious communities namely Nanak, Kabir and Sri Chaitanya, etc. Bhakta Salbega a Muslim poet and panchasakhas, poet Jaydev made this place their home and devoted their writings to evolve a rich literary tradition around the temple and the deity. Adikabi Sarala Das who was a courtesan in GajapatiKapilendra Dev’s court wrote Mahabharat in simple Odia as a break from Sanskrit dominance and later Jagannath Das wrote Bhagabat to bring in strong local language and traditions. The district of Puri carries a long tradition of music and dance. The Odia art, literature and music are influenced immensely by Sri Jagannath Culture. The traditional Mahari dance having its origin in now Devadasi culture, the Odishi dance15. Gotipua dance is another form of dance in Puri performed by boys and marital dance/skills in jaga/akhada in shahis form its unique culture. Classical songs, are mostly developed under the influence of Lord Jagannath and His favorite lyrics of Geeta Govind composed by the immortal poet Jayadev. Many poems and fictions are also written under the influence of Sri Jagannath culture. A lot of folk tales, folk songs, proverbs Chautisas, etc. are also influenced by Sri Jagannath culture.

The temple has its unique mode of operation codified in the almanac- MadalaPanji. The world- famous car festival, the sweeping ritual by Gajapati (as the main servitor depicting equality and humility), the 36 services and the duties of various servitors, the offerings and festivals are vividly documented in this almanac. Car festival draws millions of devotes from nooks and corners of the world from many caste and creed every year. The car festival which originates from main temple (Sri Mandir) traverses through the Grand Road to Mausima temple. Therefore, the maintenance of this road and its drainage/septage system is very important from cultural point of view. Apart from Car festival, there are 12 festivals unique to the temple such as (1) Snan Purnima (2) Gundicha/car festival (3) Sayan Purnima (4) PraswaParibartna (5) Odhansasthi (6) Uthapan (important for fasting habisa community) (7) Pusa Purnima (having roots in harvest and tribal traditions in western Odisha (8) Holi and Dola Purnima (9) Damanak Yatra (10) Chandan Yatra (11) Uttarayan or Makar Sankranti (having strong links to South India (12) Dakhinayan yatra. In addition, there is ritual of NabaKalebar in every 12 years mimicking the certainty of life-death and re-birth whoever is born in earth including the deities. These rituals draw devotees every day who flock to this place year-round.

While the visitors enter and exit from different doors of the temple, the prescribed tradition is to enter through Singhadwar, move towards east to Agniswar, then Pataleswar in north (temples in between), and enter through the northern door to circle around Garuda stambh to see the deities on Ratna Bedi in sanctum sanctorum. However, the situation has been very chaotic as of now and it requires orderly entry and exist string from the Grand Road corridor. Similarly, there is a prescribed

15 Odishi has a tradition of 2,000 years, and finds mention in the Natyashastra of Bharatamuni, possibly written circa 200 BCE.

way to move around the outer wall of the temple. After washing the feet at Aruna Stambh move from Singhadwara to Pejanala, Durgamadhav Temple, Bhagavati Temple and return to Singhadwar. The outer wall which was constructed by King Kapilendra Dev in 13th Century to save the temple from invaders has become weak and till now serves as the first line of defense to the temple. There is also a panchakosi parikrama16 codified for traversing the Srikshetra, this is from Singhadwar to Swargadwar, then Srilokanath temple, then Jameswar to Mangala ghat, then to Alamchandi (Atharnala) moving towards Bilweswar, then Chakratirth and then Swargadwar to Singhadwar. This is alternatively called Sankhatirtha Parikrama and has deep religious significance. However, due to encroachment and congestion, road restrictions and construction, it is almost impossible to conduct this ritual.

In respect of the safety and tradition of Lord Jagannath Temple, the then collector Mr. Gomes had prepared a report to the then British Government in the year 1803. A request had been made in that report for maintaining the safety of the rituals and traditions regarding the Seva or Puja of Lord Jagannath, which has been continuing till date. There are 248 Sevas mentioned in that report. Each and every sevayat is more active, careful and punctual in the safety and right performance of their duties by taking into their minds about their creation and existence.17

Pandas are considered to be the Tirthagurus. The Pandas have played an important role by visiting different parts of India, preaching the philosophy and doctrine of Jagannath Cult among the Hindus; collecting pilgrims and escorting them to Puri. They are also responsible for providing lodging and boarding to them in Dharmasalas at Puri and arranging a Darshan of Lord Jagannatha for them and visiting to different sacred centers and Tirthas located in the town and in its vicinity. Most often some outsiders can’t come to Puri owing to their monetary problems and other difficulties, but the Pandas meet them in their houses to bless them even without collecting any type of charge from them. Pandas give them Mahaprasad and Photo of Jagannath Mahaprabhu and other souvenirs linked with Shree Jagannath temple. The system is still in vogue.18

It has several water bodies of religious significance including the Bay of Bengal termed as Mahodadhi (the abode of Lord Vishnu in deep slumber). It also has mathas and ashrams having their origin in different religions.

2.3 Economic significance

Puri is part of the golden triangle. It has heavy tourist foot-falls. However, due to congestion and lack of proper infrastructure and sanitation its tourist potential has been under-achieved. It has rich craft tradition. The stone work and Pattachitras of Raghurajpur, applique work at Pipili and Pattachitras have strong demand from tourists. Most of these are temple art forms but have re-invented itself with modern tastes and forms. Palm leaf paintings are very ancient in Odisha and are still in demand.

16Jagannath Tatwa Ratnabali 17 Khuntia Somanath (2008): “The Panda System”, Cultural Heritage of Puri, State Level Vyas Kabi Fakir Mohan Smriti Sansad, Bhubaneswar. PP-366-375 18Patnaik sunil Kumar (2004):” Heritage Tourism: Places of Tourists’ Importance in Puri”, Orissa Reviw, September.

Now a day’s sand art popularized by several internationally acclaimed artists has made the place attractive. The Puri beach is one of the best beaches in eastern region. The marine drive leading from Konark to Puri is a place of tourist attraction. Several areas for ayurvedic centers and surfing areas have been identified and has got tourist potential.

Puri is a place of culinary delight starting from the Mahaprasad (grand offering to deities in the temple) to various local cuisines. The deities relish 56 items and sweetmeats spread over six times (dhupas): (1) Gopal Ballav (2) Morning Dhupa (3) Bhaanda Dhupa/Chhatar Bhoga (4) Madhyahn Dhupa (5) Sandhya Dhupa (6) Bada Singhar Dhupa. There is also evidence of Odisha rasagola which has GI tag to be offered once to placate Goddess Laxmi. In addition to that there are several non- vegetarian sea foods joints, Bengali, South Indian and Marwari restaurants are located in the city to cater to regional tourist tastes.

2.4 Ecological and environmental significance

Due to climate change, Odisha is most vulnerable to rise in sea-level; a meter of sea-level rise here will inundate about 800 sq. km of adjoining landmass. Moreover, it will affect the drainage and hydrology of the entire region if proper land use planning and mangrove restoration (whose areas have shrunk to 1/5th in last 50 years) is not undertaken in time. Rise in temperature with humidity will also create heat stress and make the place unattractive if orderly development, greening the city with plantations are not taken up. Being a heritage city, due to heavy footfalls, the use within these sites and their ‘pull factor’ are also far beyond the carrying capacities of the site and results in inverse expansion. As a result, the demand on the city infrastructure is stretched far beyond its carrying capacity, be it drainage, septage, water supply or sanitation. The city is also in the cyclone path and several low-lying areas are flood prone. During cyclone, the power supply system is usually crippled and takes days together to restore. The buffer areas around heritage sites are defined for the purpose of de-congesting sites and are regulated by law (for state and ASI protected sites). However, its implementation on ground on account of several socio-economic and political, factors may affect the long-term sustainability of this important city if urgent actions are not taken.

2.5 Security Significance

Puri Srimandir is considered to be one of the supreme religious institutions of the country. It has been a target of invaders from politico-religious point of view from many years. Despite its syncretic traditions the Muslim invaders 1st attacked the temple during the rule of King Mukund Dev in 1509. It caused widespread destructions to Srimandir (led by a General named as Kala Pahadas written in Madala Panji) and various temples in Puri and servitors quietly shifted the deity to Chilka. In 1565 Afghan king Suleman Ghazni plundered the temple and King Mukund Dev was also attained martyrdom. In 1575 emperor Akbar occupied Odisha, defeating the Afghan rulers. He appointed Ramachandra Dev of Bhoi dynasty and got back the deities to temple after NabaKalebar. During 1751-1803 AD Odisha was under Maratha rule and they helped in further development of temple

infrastructure. From 1803 Odisha was under British rule and they tried proselytization and also sent Gajapati to Andaman prison. But their interference in temple affairs was not much. After independence the temple administration constituted under Jagannath Temple Act are responsible for the day to day temple management. During the intervening period there have been several instances of threat perceptions to the temple from jihadi elements and even Maoist cadres. The latest input from IB was in August 2019 warning the administration from some sea borne terrorists. It was also learnt that two members of the Indian Mujahideen (IM), and LeT wing, came to Bhubaneswar in 2014-15 to do the recce for the temples in Puri and Bhuabneswar and to provide logistical support to the groups (about 4 in number) of Pakistan-based Jamaat-ud-Dawa (JuD), Jaish- e-Mohammad (JeM) and Hizbul Mujahideen (HM) for terror strike. In June 2012, there was intelligence inputs from Assam warning that that elements from LeTwere to plan an attack in Bahuda Yatra festival in Puri. Government has been on high alert to counter these threats and several check posts and marine police stations have been strengthened and one ADG rank officer has been made responsible for coastal security. Moreover NSG (Hyderabad hub) has already conducted a drill in August 2017 at the temple.

Considering these aspects, it is important to have layered perimeter security, biometric identification gates and CCTV surveillance around the temple with a state-of-the-art incident control system to neutralize such threats from enemies. Any attack on the temple has potential for raid communal conflagration across the country. For these, proper databases of hotels, lodges, occupants of shops and other establishments around the temple are needed. Isolation and evacuation zones, crowd control area to reduce the probability of stampede which need to be planned.

History of Security Breaches and Invasion of Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri

Throughout the ages the temple of Lord Jagannath, Puri had been invaded and plundered for eighteen times. • The invasion of Raktavahu on the temple of Lord Jagannath is considered as the first one as per the record of the ‘Madalapanji’, the temple chronicle. • The second invasion on the temple of Lord Jagannath was waged by Illias Shah the Sultan of Bengal in 1340 A.D. during the reign of Narasinghadeva-III. • During the reign of the Ganga King Bhanudeva Ill the third invasion took place in 1360 AD by Feroz Shah Tughluq, the Muslim ruler of Delhi. • The fourth invasion was launched by Ismail Ghazi the commander of Allauddin Hussain Shah the Sultan of Bengal in the year 1509 A.D. • The fifth invasion was launched by a Muslim invader Kalapahara in the year 1568 AD during the reign of MukundadevaHarichandan, the Chalukya King of Orissa. • The sixth invasion jointly waged on the temple of Jagannath in 1592 A.D. by Suleman, the son of Kuthu Khan and Osman, the son of Isha (ruler of Orissa). • During the reign of Purushottamadeva of Bhoi Dynasty Mirza Khurum, the commander of Islam Khan the Nawab of Bengal invaded Puri in 1601 A.D which is considered as the 7th attack on the temple of Lord Jagannath. • ‘Madalapanji’ Mirza Khurum invaded Puri temple during the time of Dola Yatra. He found no deities in the temple and so looted the underground treasury. Hasim Khan, the Subedar of Orissa waged the eighth invasion on the great temple of Lord Jagannath at Puri. • The ninth invasion on the temple of Jagannath was launched by a Hindu Rajput JagirdarKesodasmaru in 1610 A.D. • Kesodasmaru plundered crores of treasury of the temple of Jagannath between 1611 to 1617 AD. • Kalyan Mall is known to have attacked on Puri temple and also looted its treasure. • Mukarram Khan waged the 12th attack on the temple of Lord Jagannath in 1617 A.D. • Thirteenth invasion on the temple of Jagannath was launched by Mirza Ahmad Beg, the nephew of Moghul empress Nurjahan. • The invasion of Amir Mutaquad Khan alias Mirza Makki is considered as fourteenth one. Mirza Makki became the new Governor of Orissa and ruled till 1641 A.D. Mirzamakki invaded the Jagannath temple for two times. His commander plundered the temple and the old palace at Balisahi. The invasion took place in the year 1645 A.D. • The fifteenth invasion was waged by Amir Fateh Khan in 1647 A.D. He attacked the temple and plundered valuable gems like diamond, pearl and gold etc. • In 1692 A.D. Aurangzeb the Moghul emperor issued an order to destroy the temple of Lord Jagannath. At that time Divyasingha Deva was the king of Khurda. Ekram Khan was the Nawab of Orissa who waged this invasion on the temple with the help of his brother Mastram Khan. The Nawab entered the temple and climbed to the - golden throne of Jagannath. The treasure of the temple was looted. This was the sixteenth invasion on the temple of Lord Jagannath. • Muhammad Taqi Khan became Naib Nazim (Deputy Subedar) of Orissa from A.D. 1727 to 1734. During his time, he invaded the temple of Jagannath for two times in 1731 A.D. and 1733 A.D.

Chapter-III: Socio Economic Condition of the Project Affected Families

In relation to the land acquisition for the said projects, the entire project affected families.As a part of undertaking SIA exercise, a complete enumeration survey using structured questionnaires was undertaken. On the basis of quantitative information obtained from that survey, a detailed socio- economic baseline of the project affected families is analyzed in this chapter. For definitional point of view, all the families whose lands and housing properties are planned to be acquired for the project are project affected families. Further, by considering RFCTLAR & R Act, 2013, all eligible household members are treated as extended families. The extended household members are appropriately considered in the Rehabilitation and Resettlement Entitlement Matrix annexed herewith.

3.1 Religion and Caste

All of the project affected families arising out of security zone Social Structure of Households (%) development project are Hindus by 80 73 religion. With respect to caste 70 structure predominantly they are 60 general and OBC categories of families. Overall, the percentage share of 50 General and OBC categories of families 40 are found at 73.0 and 27.0 30 27 respectively. Compared to all mouzas, 20 the percentage share of OBC categories of families is higher at 10 ChudangaSahi. The incidence of 0 General category of families to the General OBC extent of 100 percent is found at Figure 1: Social Structure of Households (%) DolamandapSahi and about 93.8 percent of families of ManikarnikaSahi are also General Category families.

Table 5: Number of Families by Religion and Caste

Religion Number of Families / Caste BaseliSahi ChudangaSahi Dolamandapa KalikadeviSa ManikarnikaSa Grand Total Sahi-1 hi hi No. % No. % No % No % No % No % Hindu General 157 79.3 68 58.6 14 100.0 15 93.8 67 69.8 321 73.0 OBC 41 20.7 48 41.4 0.0 1 6.3 29 30.2 119 27.0 Total 198 100.0 116 100.0 14 100.0 16 100.0 96 100.0 440 100.0

3.2 Family Structure

Families are classified on the basis TYPE OF FAMILY STRUCTURE OF THE THE PAHS (% of type of family as nuclear and SHARE) joint family. As it is observed from the following table, incidence of joint families is more prevalent at BaseliSahi and ManikarnikaSahi and on the other hand, incidence Nuclear Joint of nuclear families is more Families Families prevalent at ChudangaSahi, DolamandapSahi and KalikadeviSahi. Overall, percentage share of nuclear families is slightly higher than joint families. The percentage share of joint and nuclear families stands Figure 2: Type of Family structure of the PAHs (% Share) at 48.2 and 51.8 percent respectively.

Table 6: Number of families on the basis of type of family

Type of Number of families by Mouzas family BaseliSahi ChudangaSahi Dolamandapa KalikadeviSahi ManikarnikaSahi All Mouzas Sahi-1 Joint 107 42 1 2 60 212 (48.2%) Nuclear 91 74 13 14 36 228 (51.8%) Grand Total 198 116 14 16 96 440 (100.0%)

3.3 Family Size

The number of member present in a family is called family size. In joint families, overall, there are seven members per household as against the same at three persons for nuclear families. The average number of members per household is overall found at five persons and the overall prevalence of male and female members per household is found at three persons under each sex category. Obviously, number of members present in joint families is slightly higher than nuclear families in all mouzas.

Table 7: Average Male members per household

Average number of members per household by Mouzas Type of BaseliSah ChudangaSa Dolamandapa KalikadeviSa ManikarnikaSa All Family i hi Sahi-1 hi hi Mouzas M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T M F T Joint 4 4 7 3 3 6 2 2 4 3 2 4 4 8 5 4 3 7 Nuclear 2 2 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 0 1 2 3 1 2 1 3 Grand Total 3 3 6 2 2 4 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 6 2 3 3 5 Note:- M stands for ‘Male’, F stands for ‘Female’ & T stands for ‘Total’

3.4 Dwelling Condition

Dwelling condition of the families is analysed on the basis of current place of stay of the families which is expressed in terms of own house, and rented house. Majority of families to the extent of 98.0 percent live in their own houses and rest 2 percent of the families live in rented accommodations. About 59.5 percent of the household dwelling units are constructed on plots where the occupants have their own RoRs. Another 8.9 percent of the dwelling units are constructed on lands with sale deeds only. Jointly RoRs and sale deeds are found to be 68.4 percent of the families. This implies out of the total 431 families living in their own houses, 301 household dwelling units, about 69.8 percent are constructed on their own lands. Remaining 31.2 percent who are staying in their own accommodations have encroached lands of Mathas, Shree Jagannath temple, Govt. Lands and even private lands.

Table 8: Current dwelling Condition

Number of families by form of dwelling No of household Sale units having dwelling units deeds/ Mouzas with Possession of Agreement Own House Rented Grand Total RoRs Paper BaseliSahi 195 3 198 170 5 ChudangaSahi 110 6 116 19 34 Dolamandapa Sahi-1 14 14 13 KalikadeviSahi 16 16 1 ManikarnikaSahi 96 96 59 Grand Total 431 9 440 262 39 % Share 98.0 2.00 100.0 59.5 8.9

3.5 Aspects of housing condition

A good and qualitative dwelling unit should have adequate facilities for providing clean environment as well as basic facilities including sanitation. The quality of the dwelling units is assessed in the following table. Out of the total families enumerated, 3.0 percent have separate place for animals in their houses. About 93 percent have bathrooms and toilets in their houses. About 98.3 percent of families have electricity connections in their houses. About 89.3 percent of families use piped water supply for their household uses and remaining 9.8 percent of the families depend on borewells and tube wells for their household water uses.

Table 9: Number of families on the basis of housing amenities

Number of Families Water supply Washing Separate Bathroom Toilet Piped through Mouzas Place Electricity place for within the within water Boring/ Tube inside Connection animals house house supply wells / hand house Pumps BaseliSahi 5 194 195 196 197 187 12 ChudangaSahi 6 89 89 87 108 92 20 Dolamandapa Sahi-1 1 14 14 14 14 14 KalikadeviSahi 16 16 16 16 14 11 ManikarnikaSahi 1 96 96 96 96 86 All Mouzas 13 409 410 409 431 393 43 % of Families BaseliSahi 2.5 98.0 98.5 99.0 99.5 94.4 6.1 ChudangaSahi 5.2 76.7 76.7 75.0 93.1 79.3 17.2 Dolamandapa Sahi-1 7.1 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 KalikadeviSahi 0.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 87.5 68.8 ManikarnikaSahi 1.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 89.6 0.0 All Mouzas 3.0 93.0 93.2 93.0 98.0 89.3 9.8

3.6 Marital Status % of household members of

The marital status of the household Project Affected Households members of all 440 families covered in the study is shown in the following WIDOWER 1.65 table. As it is revealed from the WIDOW 5.00 following table altogether there are SEPARATED 0.05 2062 members of which 56.9 percent are married and 36.3 percent are DIVORCEE 0.05 unmarried. Divorcees, separated from UNMARRIED 36.32 respective spouses, widows and MARRIED 56.94 widowers are distinctly shown from the analysis point of view. The percentage 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 share of widows and widowers are Figure 3: % of household members of Project Affected Househols found at 5.0 and 1.6 percent

respectively. The case of divorcees and separated out from their respective spouses is found very much negligible and proportionately their share is less than one percent under each case.

Table 10: Number of families on the basis of marital status Marital Number of families Category BaseliSa ChudangaS Dolamanda KalikadeviS ManikarnikaS All % hi ahi pa Sahi-1 ahi ahi Mouz Share as Married 566 317 4 4 283 1174 56.94 Unmarried 99 240 184 198 28 749 36.32 Divorcee 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.05 Separated 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.05 Widow 50 21 0 2 29 103 5.00 Widower 20 11 0 0 2 34 1.65 All 737 590 187 204 344 2062 100.0 Categories 0

3.7 Educational Qualification

The educational background of the members of PAFs are classified under six categories as upto primary standard, secondary standard, higher secondary/intermediate, graduation, post- graduation and other professional degrees. It is found that majority of household members are upto primary standard which also includes non-school going children below six years of age. Majority of household members to the extent of 30.2 percent have upto primary level of education. This is followed by upto secondary level of education (27.2%), Graduation (19.2%), higher secondary /intermediate (15.2%), post graduate (4.7%) and other professional courses (3.5%).

% of Household Members

35.0 30.2 30.0 27.2

25.0 19.2 20.0 15.2 15.0

10.0 4.7 3.5 5.0

0.0 Upto Primary Secondary Higher Graduate Post Graduate Professional Secondary/ Cources Intermediate

Figure 4: % of Household Members

Table 11: Educational Background of household members

Educational Number of household members Background BaseliSa Chudan Dolamanda Kalikad Manikarn All % hi gaSahi pa Sahi-1 eviSahi ikaSahi Mouzas Share Upto Primary 216 184 0 13 139 622 30.2 Secondary 220 212 13 0 66 560 27.2 Higher Secondary/ 73 72 0 89 94 314 15.2 Intermediate Graduate 167 61 174 89 20 396 19.2 Post Graduate 33 28 0 13 20 98 4.7 Professional 29 33 0 0 4 72 3.5 Courses (ITI, Diploma and other technical degrees) All Categories 737 590 187 204 344 2062 100.0

3.8 Age Group and Sex Categry

Out of 2062 housheold members, there are are 1148 male members (55.7%) and 914 female members (44.3%). The overall sex ratio among the project affected household members stand at 796 implying that there are 796 female members per 1000 male emmbers. Compared to all age group as shown in the following table 12, the sex ratio is most favorable to females in the age group of 18-30 years. There are about 77.7 percent of household members who are above 18 years of age.

Table 12: Age Group and Sex Category of household members

Age-group Number of persons by Sex Category Sex Ratio (No. of females/ Females Males Total % Share 1000 males) 0-4 Years 46 55 101 4.9 824 4-6 Years 14 24 38 1.8 591 6-18 Years 137 184 321 15.6 746 18-30 Years 175 163 338 16.4 1073 30-60 Years 427 552 978 47.4 773 > 60 years 115 170 285 13.8 679 Overall 914 1148 2062 100.0 796

3.9 Main Occupation

Analysis of the main occupations of the project HOUSEHOLD MAIN OCCUPATION (% affected families; it is found SHARE) that out of 440 families, 90.0 there are 756 household 80.0 members associated with 70.0 income generating 60.0 activities. This implies that 50.0 more than one person from 82.8 each household 40.0 approximated to 2 persons 30.0 per household are 20.0 associated with household 10.0 10.4 income generation. Broadly 0.0 1.9 4.9 the household main DAILY WAGE BUSINESS T E M P L E SAL AR Y occupations are classified EARNER P R I E ST / EARNERS SEVAYATS under Business, temple priests/ Sevayats, salary Figure 5: Household Main Occupation (% Share) earners and daily wage earners. Main occupation of families is more skewed in favor of business and about 82.8 percent of the PAFs derive their main income from business. This is followed by temple priests/ sevayats. About 10.4 percent of the PAFs derive their main income by working as priests/ Sevayats in Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri. Salary earning including pensions from Govt. services account the main source of household income for about 4.9 percent of the overall PAFs. Negligible percentage of families to the extent of about 1.9 percent derives their income by working as wage earners. Considering all occupations, the average annual household income is calculated at Rs.429658.00. As, it is depicted from the following table, the average annual household income of salary earners is found at the maximum at Rs. 803840.00 followed by business at Rs. 629187.00. Temple priests and Sevayats on an average receive Rs.156667.00 annually.

AVERAGE ANNUAL INCOME (RS.)

803840

629187

429658

156667

90000

Business Temple Priest/ Salary Earners Daily Wage All Occupations Sevayats Earner

Figure 6: Average Annual Income (Rs.)

Table 13: Household Main Occupation

No. of household members Average Reported Annual Dolamandapa All % Share Occupations BaseliSahi ChudangaSahi KalikadeviSahi ManikarnikaSahi Income Sahi-1 Mouzas (Rs.) Business 95 73 1 3 48 626 82.8 629187 Temple Priest/ 17 3 0 7 1 79 10.4 156667 Sevayats Salary Earners 10 3 0 0 0 37 4.9 803840 Daily Wage 3 0 0 0 2 14 1.9 90000 Earner All Occupations 125 79 1 10 51 756 100.0 429658

Chapter Highlights

→ All of the project affected families are Hindus by religion. With respect to caste structure predominantly the PAFs are general and OBC categories of families. → The percentage share of joint and nuclear families stands at 48.2 and 51.8 percent respectively. → In joint families, overall, there are seven members per household as against the same at three persons for nuclear families. → The average number of members per household is overall found at five persons and the overall prevalence of male and female members per household is found at three persons under each sex category. → Majority of families to the extent of 98.0 percent live in their own houses and rest 2 percent of the families live in rented accommodations. → Out of the total 431 families living in their own houses, 301 household dwelling units, about 69.8 percent are constructed on their own lands. → With respect to housing amenities, out of the total families enumerated, 3.0 percent have separate place for animals in their houses. About 93 percent have bathrooms and toilets in their houses. → About 98.3 percent of families have electricity connections in their houses. About 89.3 percent of families use piped water supply for their household uses and remaining 9.8 percent of the families depend on borewells and tube wells for their household water uses. → Altogether there are 2062 members of which 56.9 percent are married and 36.3 percent are unmarried. → The percentage share of widows and widowers are found at 5.0 and 1.6 percent respectively. The case of divorcees and separated out from their respective spouses is found very much negligible and proportionately their share is less than one percent under each case. → Majority of household members to the extent of 30.2 percent have upto primary level of education. This is followed by upto secondary level of education (27.2%), Graduation (19.2%), higher secondary /intermediate (15.2%), post graduate (4.7%) and other professional courses (3.5%). → Household main occupation is more skewed in favor of business and about 82.8 percent of the PAFs derive their main income from business. This is followed by temple priests/ sevayats. About 10.4 percent of the PAFs derive their main income by working as priests/ Sevayats in Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri. → The average annual household income is calculated at Rs.429658.00.

Chapter-4: Assessment of Land Acquisition, Household Awareness about the upcoming project

After a good deal of discussion pertaining to the socio economic and demographic details of the families in the project affected mouza/ villages, present chapter delves into assessing the land acquisition process, household awareness on the process of land acquisition. Section-1 deals with assessment of land acquisition, household awareness about the project and their willingness to participate in the land acquisition process as desired by the project. Subsequent section deals with likely impacts of the project on livelihood of the project affected families. In conclusion part, type of assistance for different types of assets losses as desired by the PAFs are outlined.

4.1 Assessment of Land Acquisition

As per SIA Notification (No. RDM-LAA-PURI-004- Acquired Private Land per PAF 2019/28897 R &DM dated 24 0.14 Sep 2019), 15.191 acres 0.12 0.122 comprising of 12.5445 acres of 0.1 private land and 2.6465 acre 0.08 of Govt. land were planned to 0.06 be acquired. After the 0.04 0.038 0.033 0.029 commencement of SIA Study, 0.02 0.015 0.4596 acres of private land 0 0.006 comprising of 0.304 acres of land from BaseliSahi, 0.1475 acres of ChudangaSahi, and 0.008 acres of ManikarnikaSahi were added. Figure 7: Acquired Private Land Per PAF So combinedly, 15.6505 acres of land as mentioned in the following table are planned to be acquired for the upcoming project.Out of the total 15.6505 acres of land as per SIA to be acquired 13.004 acres are under private ownership and 2.6465 acres are under Govt. ownership. Maximum proportion of land is to be acquired at ChudangaSahi followed by ManikarnikaSahi, and DolamandapSahiBaseliSahi, Kalikadevi Sahi-1. With respect to private lands, average amount of land per PAH stands highest at KalikadeviSahi at 0.122 acres followed by ManikarnikaSahi (0.038) acres, ChudangaSahi (0.033 acres) and DolamandapSahi (0.066) acres. Compared to all Mouzas, maximum number of PAFs are found at BaseliSahi followed by ChudangaSahi and ManikarnikaSahi.

Table 14: Amount of Land under Acquisition and the incidence of PAFs

Amount of Land being Acquired No of PAFs Affected (Acres) Sl. Mouza for Private private land Private Govt. Land Total Lands area per PAH Land 1 BaseliSahi 3.332 0.64 3.972 198 0.015 2 ChudangaSahi 4.009 1.28 5.289 116 0.033 3 Dolamandap Sahi-1 0.077 0.074 0.151 14 0.006 4 KalikadeviSahi 1.951 0.52 2.471 16 0.122 5 ManikarnikaSahi 3.635 0.133 3.768 96 0.038 All Mouzas 13.004 2.6465 15.6505 440 0.029

4.2 Land Acquisition by Kisam of Lands

The classification of 15.651 acres of land on the basis of 70.000 61.3 kisama of land suggests that 60.000 there are elevenkisamas of 50.000 land as Debastahali, 40.000 Gharabari, Gharabari-1, 30.000 Gharabari-2, Patita, Rasta, 18.4 15.3 Bagayata and Jalasaya, 20.000 Chautara, Nayanjori etc. 10.000 0.013 0.2 0.5 1.6 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.3 Major Kisams include 0.000 Gharabari, Rasta, Gharabari-2 etc. Bagayats, Chautara, Debasthali type of kisams constitute negligible share in Kisam of Acquired Lands (% Share) the overall kisams of lands.

Table 15: Kisam wise lands planned for acquisition

Acquired land area (in Acres) Kisam of % Lands BaseliSa ChudangaS Dolamandap KalikadeviS Manikarnika Grand Share hi ahi Sahi-1 ahi Sahi Total Bagayat 0.002 0.002 0.01 Chautara 0.027 0.027 0.2 Debastali 0.037 0.038 0.006 0.081 0.5 Gharabari 0.385 3.6185 0.071 1.9355 3.5827 9.5927 61.3 Gharabari-1 0.0935 0.1475 0.008 0.249 1.6 Gharabari-2 2.857 0.02 2.877 18.4 HidiGohiri 0.148 0.148 0.9 Jalasaya 0.001 0.091 0.092 0.6 Nayanajori 0.059 0.074 0.133 0.8 Patita 0.047 0.047 0.3 Rasta 0.5965 1.14 0.5085 0.1573 2.4023 15.3 Grand Total 3.972 5.289 0.151 2.471 3.768 15.651 100.0

4.3 Loss of Assets as a result of Land Acquisition

Range of assets are found individually as well as in combinations on the lands planned to be acquired. As detailed out in the following table, the various assets’ categories include home stead lands, houses, shops, lodges, houses and lodges, houses and shops, house and temple, house, temple and shop, lodges and shops, religious monasteries (Mathas) etc. The bifurcation of 15.651 acres of land under different assets categories is presented in the following table.

Table 16: Assets Categories on to be acquired land

Sl. Nature of Affected Baseli Chudang Dolamand Kalikad Manikar Grand No. Property Sahi aSahi ap Sahi-1 eviSahi nikaSahi Total 1 Badadanda 0.23 0.23 2 Beyond 75m SIA Zon, so NA 0.002 0.018 0.02 3 Chautara 0.027 0.027 4 Dolabedi 0.067 0.067 5 HadiGohiri 0.148 0.148 6 Hadigoheri Road 0.012 0.012 7 Homested land 0.016 0.006 0.022 8 House 1.63 0.56 0 0.009 1.665 3.864

Sl. Nature of Affected Baseli Chudang Dolamand Kalikad Manikar Grand No. Property Sahi aSahi ap Sahi-1 eviSahi nikaSahi Total 9 Lodge (Kashinath Bhawan, 1.065 0.346 0 0 0.012 1.4235 Bishnu Bhawan, Gopal 5 Bhawan, Shimla Bhawan, Chandan Hajuri Lodge, Laxmi Bhawan, Asam Bhawan, Brazadham, Gopinath Bhawan, Harekrushna Lodge, Kalicharan Lodge, Kashinath Bhawan, Mamamani Lodge, Murali Bhawan, Pratihari Bhawan, Raghunath AtithiVihar, Subham Lodge) 10 House & Shop 0.28 0.035 0 0.255 1.518 2.088 11 Matha (Bada 0 2.141 0.039 1.557 0.26 3.997 AkhadaMatha, LanguliMatha, DhakhinaparswaMatha, EmarMatha, KatakiMatha, RebeshaMatha,SanaChhata Matha, Sankha Chakra Matha, ToraniChatraMatha, TrimaliMatha, UttarparswaMatha, ManguMatha, Radha Ballav, Punjabi ) 12 House and Shop 0.013 0.013 13 Jalasaya 0.001 0.091 0 0 0 0.092 14 Medical 0.078 0.078 15 Nayanajori 0.059 0.059 16 Refuse 0.015 0.015 17 Road 0.462 0.91 0 0.471 0.0995 1.9425 18 Shop 0.204 0.443 0.0735 0.721 5 19 Shop (ManguMatha) 0.123 0.123 20 Shop (Radha BallavMatha) 0.032 0.032 21 Shree ShreeTarun Ganapati 0.006 0.006 Samiti Temple 22 Sola Pua Maa 0.006 0.006 ThakuraniMandhir& one Shop 23 Sweeper Passage 0.029 0 0 0 0.023 0.052 24 Temple 0.037 0 0 0 0.056 0.093

Sl. Nature of Affected Baseli Chudang Dolamand Kalikad Manikar Grand No. Property Sahi aSahi ap Sahi-1 eviSahi nikaSahi Total 25 Vacant Place (EmarMatha, 0.212 0.15 0.074 0.029 0.055 0.52 Sita Matha, etc.) Grand Total 3.972 5.289 0.151 2.471 3.768 15.651

4.4 Household Awareness

Out of the total project affected families, about 98.2 percent of the PAFs are aware about the project. This implies nature of project activities being pursued and planned to be pursued are very much transparent and project authorities have undertaken good deal of publicity about the project. Out of five mouzas under study, in two mouzas, DolamandapSahi and KalikadeviSahi, there is 100 percent awareness about the project.

Table 17: Awareness about the upcoming project among the PAFs

Mouzas No of Families Aware about the Total No. of PAFs % of Families upcoming project BaseliSahi 192 198 97.0 ChudangaSahi 110 116 94.8 Dolamandapa Sahi-1 14 14 100.0 KalikadeviSahi 16 16 100.0 ManikarnikaSahi 94 96 97.9 All Mouzas 432 440 98.2

4.5 Household Willingness

Like any other development project, the upcoming security zone around Shree Jagannath Temple Project” also requires some additional lands to be acquired from private families. It is also important to notice that overall, more than 90 percent of the PAFs are willing to participate in the land acquisition process being planned to be acquired for the project by the project authorities. However, inter street (Mouza) variations are also observed as mentioned in the following table. The willingness to cooperate in the land acquisition process seems relatively lower at KalikadeviSahi. About 62.5 percent of PAFs of KalikadeviSahi have willingness to cooperate in the land acquisition process. Parental property since generations, proximity to Shree Jagannath temple, better business prospects at current location, good deal of income from the tourists by means YatriSeva as elicited by the respondents are some of the prominent reasons for which a section of people are not willing to cooperate in the land acquisition process for the upcoming project.

Table 18: Household willingness to cooperate in the land acquisition Process

Mouzas No of families willing to allow Total No. of PAFs % of Families Govt. to acquire their land and house BaseliSahi 181 198 91.4

ChudangaSahi 103 116 88.8 Dolamandapa Sahi-1 14 14 100.0 KalikadeviSahi 10 16 62.5 ManikarnikaSahi 95 96 99.0 All Mouzas 403 440 91.6

4.6 Household Benefits of the project

The project is to render HH willingness to cooperate in land acquisition beneficial impacts at household process and anticipated positive outcomes of the level is elicited by overall 50.0 project (% of Households) percent of the families. 120 Comparatively maximum 100 proportion of families to the 80 extent of 92.9 percent of 60 DolamandapSahi are of the 40 opinion about the positive 20 impacts of the project at their 0 respective household level 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 compared to 6.3 percent at Kalika Devi Sahi. By comparing % of HHs willing to cooperate in Land Acquisition Process household willingness to % of HHs anticipate posotive outcomes of the project at HH level cooperate in the project Figure 8: HH willingness to cooperate in land acquisition process and (previous Section-4.3) and anticipated positive outcomes of the project (% of Households) families anticipated positive outcomes of the project, it can be stated that both are positive correlated with each other. This implies more is the expected positive outcome of the project, more is the willingness to participate in the land acquisition process.

Table 19: No of families think that project is beneficial at household level

Mouzas No of families think that project is Total No. of % of Families beneficial for their families PAFs BaseliSahi 109 198 55.1 ChudangaSahi 63 116 54.3 Dolamandapa Sahi-1 13 14 92.9 KalikadeviSahi 1 16 6.3 ManikarnikaSahi 34 96 35.4 All Mouzas 220 440 50.0

4.7 Likely impacts on livelihoods

With respect to adverse impacts of the project on household livelihood situation, overall 59.1 percent of the families’ view that project will have negative impacts on livelihoods as against maximum proportion of families to the extent of 78.1 percent of ManikarnikaSahi. About 58.6 percent of families of BaseliSahi and 56.9 percent of families of ChudangaSahi are also of similar opinions. Despite minimum proportion of families of KalikadeviSahi anticipate positive outcome of the project at household level, still maximum proportion of families don’t seem to be worried about adverse livelihoods impacts of the project. Major livelihood issues arise because of losses of shopping space, lodging spaces, structures being used for renting out pilgrims, possible displacement. Sevayatfamilies are also of the opinion that they have to incur more conveyance expenses and also bear the opportunity cost of time utilization to go to temple for their daily works. Besides, they may also have loss of YatriSeva.

Table 20: Household opinion on adverse impacts of the project on Livelihoods

Mouzas No of families think that project is to Total No. of % of HHs affect adversely to their livelihood PAFs BaseliSahi 116 198 58.6 ChudangaSahi 66 116 56.9 Dolamandapa Sahi-1 1 14 7.1 KalikadeviSahi 2 16 12.5 ManikarnikaSahi 75 96 78.1 All Mouzas 260 440 59.1

4.8 Likely Displacement

In addition to 159 families having RoRs, other categories of families who have constructed their home by encroaching Govt. land, Shree Jagannath temple land, Matha land, sale deeds etc. are likely to be displaced. Altogether about 301 families are likely to be displaced. However, with the objective of mitigating the adverse effects of displacement, a well-designed Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan (R& R Plan) is prepared on the basis of opinions gathered from different strata of PAFs. The R&R plan annexed herewith is prepared by gathering opinions from families, shop keepers, lodges, and religious monasteries (Mathas).

Table 21: Nature of ownership of the affected property and likely displacement

Number of Families Nature of ownership of the Baseli Chudang Dolamand Kalikade Manikarn Grand affected property Sahi aSahi apa Sahi-1 viSahi ikaSahi Total Agreement Paper 1 1 BadaakhadaMatha 6 6 Beyond 75m SIA Zone 5 5 Encroachment in Govt. Land 2 3 5 Encroachment in Jagannath 3 8 1 15 8 35 Temple land Encroachment in Matha Land_ 6 18 24

Number of Families Nature of ownership of the Baseli Chudang Dolamand Kalikade Manikarn Grand affected property Sahi aSahi apa Sahi-1 viSahi ikaSahi Total House Encroachment in Matha Land 1 1 (Shop) Encroachment in Private Land 9 9 HHs having RoR 102 15 13 1 29 159 Matha 1 1 Received as gift 1 1 Refused 3 1 5 Refused ( Punjabi Matha) 1 1 Sale Deed 3 3 6 Shree Narayan Mahasuara, 1 1 President, GelabaiThakurani Grand Total 149 43 14 18 76 301

4.9 Loss of present earning

As a result of loss of livelihoods assets and livelihoods options, there is to be loss in current income. As it is depicted in the following table, maximum proportion of PAFs to the extent of 47.7 percent of overall families covering all mouzas will incur loss of present income to the extent of 80-100 percent. About 18.8 percent will lose current income between the range 40-60 percent, 17.7 percent in the range of 20-40 percent. The discussion Figure 9: Extent of loss of current income (% of Households) suggests that out of the total number of families viewing that the upcoming project is likely to affect adversely to their livelihood sources, very minimum proportion of them view that the extent of loss would be in the range 0-20 percent. Majority of respondents of PAFs are apprehensive about loss of major chunk of their current income.

Table 22: Extent of loss of current income

Extent of No of Families % Livelihoo BaseliSa ChudangaSa Dolamanda KalikadeviSa ManikarnikaS All Shar d Loss hi hi p Sahi-1 hi ahi Mouza e (%) s 0-20 4 3 0 0 6 12 4.6 20-40 8 9 0 0 36 46 17.7 40-60 23 16 0 0 12 49 18.8 60-80 5 19 0 2 10 29 11.2 80-100 77 19 1 0 10 124 47.7 Total 116 66 1 2 75 260 100. 0

4.10 Expected Support from the project

In lieu of assets loss and consequently loss of livelihoods assets and option, the PAFs expect a multiple range of compensations as per their requirements. As indicated in the following table, 14 different assistance options are expected by the PAFs.Major five categories of assistance options include cash for land followed by cash for home, cash for shop, plot for lodge, and shop for shop. Other options also include home for home, cash for lodge, rent for shop, plot for home etc.

Assistance Options (% of Households) 20.0 20.0 17.0 18.0 14.3 16.0 13.9 14.0 11.8 12.0 8.4 10.0 8.0 4.1 5.0 6.0 2.3 4.0 0.9 0.9 0.9 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.0

Figure 10: Assistance Options (% of Households)

Table 23: Assistance Option desired by the PAFs

Sl. Type of No. of families % Assistance BaseliSahi ChudangaSahi Dolamandapa KalikadeviSahi ManikarnikaSahi Grand Share Option Sahi-1 Total 1 Cash for land 46 14 0 3 25 88 20.0 2 Cash for home 45 14 0 0 20 75 17.0 3 Cash for Lodge 19 1 0 0 4 22 5.0 4 Cash for Shop 13 36 0 0 11 63 14.3 5 Home for home 6 7 0 2 17 37 8.4 6 Plot for Lodge 32 8 0 5 7 61 13.9 7 Shop for Shop 12 21 14 3 11 52 11.8 8 Plot for Home 11 5 0 2 0 18 4.1 9 Self-Relocation 3 1 0 0 1 4 0.9 10 Lodge for Lodge 4 0 0 0 0 4 0.9 11 Cash for Matha 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.2 12 Enhanced 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 Package for Sevayat family 13 Plot for ashram 4 0 0 0 0 4 0.9 14 Rent for shop 1 9 0 0 0 10 2.3 Total 198 116 14 16 96 440 100.0

4.11 Expected cash compensation

As the assets of PAFs are nearest to the world-famous heritage site, the loss of property either homestead plot, or building or any type of business establishments are viewed very much invaluable compared to any amount of cash or kind compensation. Majority of the PAFs are of the view that they are willing to cooperate with the upcoming project because the project aims atheritage conservation and security enhancement of Shree Jagannath temple. It is in this background maximum possible compensation and R&R package should be offered by the project authorities. Apart from it, displaced families should also be relocated so that they can be able to continue with their religious and cultural faiths and traditions.

Chapter Highlights

→ Average amount of land per PAF stands highest at KalikadeviSahi at 0.122 acres followed by ManikarnikaSahi (0.038) acres, ChudangaSahi (0.033 acres) and DolamandapSahi (0.066) acres.

→ Compared to all Mouzas, maximum number of PAFs are found at BaseliSahi followed by ChudangaSahi and ManikarnikaSahi. → Kisam wise, percentage share of Gharabari type of lands stands at 77.7 percent followed by Gharabari-II type of lands at 17.8 percent. These two categories account around 95.5 percent of all kisams of land planned to be acquired. → Range of assets are found individually as well as in combinations on the lands planned to be acquired. Various assets’ categories include home stead lands, houses, shops, lodges, houses and lodges, houses and shops, house and temple, house, temple and shop, lodges and shops, religious monasteries (Mathas) etc. → About 98.2 percent of the PAFs are aware about the project. This implies nature of project activities being pursued and planned to be pursued are very much transparent and project authorities have undertaken good deal of publicity about the project. → Overall, more than 90 percent of the PAFs are willing to participate in the land acquisition process being planned to be acquired for the project by the project authorities. → Expected positive outcome of the project contributes positively to willingness to participate in the land acquisition process. → Major livelihood issues arise because of losses of shopping space, lodging spaces, structures being used for renting out pilgrims, possible displacement. Sevayatfamilies are also of the opinion that they have to incur more conveyance expenses and also bear the opportunity cost of time utilization to go to temple for their daily works. Besides, they may also have loss of YatriSeva. → Maximum proportion of PAFs to the extent of 47.7 percent of overall families covering all mouzas will incur loss of present income to the extent of 80-100 percent. About 18.8 percent will lose current income between the range 40-60 percent, 17.7 percent in the range of 20-40 percent. → Major five categories of assistance options include cash for land followed by cash for home, cash for shop, plot for lodge, and shop for shop. Other options also include home for home, cash for lodge, rent for shop, plot for home etc.

CHAPTER-5: Expected Impacts of the Project and Social Impact Management Plan

The purpose of the SIMP is to identify the environmental and social management and mitigation initiatives required to implement the project in accordance with the provisions enshrined in “The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (RFCTLARR, 2013)”. The multifarious impacts of the project associated with the benefits and costs in the sphere of socio-economic, cultural as well asenvironmental are outlined before preparing the SIMP. On the basis of the areas of concern outlined, the environmental and Social Impact management plan covering the likely mitigation measures are suggested. While suggesting mitigation measures, in relation to the areas of concern in SIMP, the opinion of the respondents and provisions of RFCTLARR, 2013 are taken into consideration. Apart from it, before preparing the SIMP, the perceptions of the local people on the likely impacts of the project are also thoroughly deliberated in the first section of the current chapter. The SIMP is shown in the last section in terms of a SIMP Matrix.

5.1 Social Impacts

Table 24: Likely Social Impacts of the upcoming Project Social Benefits Social Costs • Due to the creation of heritage security zone, the • Some of the Monasteries splendor and majestic beauty of the Temple would be as explained by their enhanced and visitors can get a glimpse and enjoy the Mahantas were affected beauty from a far distance. by the “Security Project” . • Safety and security of tourists and pilgrims will be better they should be well promoted. Previously, various monasteries were using compensated and suitably adequate space for other than religious activities. Beyond rehabilitated. Their that, anti-social elements were akin to forcefully encroach inmates should also be the space of monasteries to accomplish foul play. provided with Vedic and • The upcoming project is aiming at conservation of the Sanskrit education free of deities of the monasteries. As a result, tourists will get cost. chances to visit the monasteries’ deities during their • “Gosalas” currently circumnavigating the Shree Jagannath temple. functioning in some of the • Tourists will get a chance to view antique properties monasteries are likely to associated with different religious monasteries, if face inconveniencies as preserved in a planned museum. they • As a result of security zone project, the stampedes explained.So,alternative previously taken place during special festivals of Shree arrangements for Jagannath temple can be completely averted. “Gosalas” should be • Due to such type of project, there could be traffic control expeditiously functional. in a more planned and organized manner.

Social Benefits Social Costs • Ambulance and fire service vehicles in all exigent situations can move smoothly around Shree Jagannath temple. • The unnecessary rush around Shree Jagannath Temple as a result of existing unplanned business activities would be prevented. • Planned development as envisioned under the project will enhance the heritage value of the city. • Anti-social and unscrupulous people living in different unauthorized locations near to Shree Jagannath Temple area, would be eliminated. • As it is mentioned in the project concept note, due to the emergence of security zone project, the terrorists’ activities could be detected much in advance through installation of different surveillance devices around Shree Jagannath temple. Besides positioning of special terrorist prevention squads to safeguard the temple can be easily accomplished as and when any emergency arises. • There is large congregation inside the temple everyday during the time of flag changing rituals, now the devotees can view the flag changing rituals clearly sitting from outside the temple. • Problem occurs due to lack of space during “Bahuda” will be overcome by getting space near Emar Math Chokada. • Queue system for devotees at the time of large congregation can be effectively managed by getting large space around the temple.

5.2 Economic Impacts

Table 25: Likely Economic Impacts of the Project

Economic Benefits Economic Costs • As a result of beautification and cleanliness • Due to dismantling of lodges in around Shree Jagannath temple, there shall the 75 metre zone, there may be be more tourists’ footfall and consequently shortage of lodging space in the there will be more generation of income for short run until all lodges get fully the families engaged as tourists’-based service restructured at alternative places providers. as briefed by the local Public. • It is viewed that the new market complex • The owners of the lodge shoud planned as a part of heritage conservation be well compensated for the project will be one of the suitable and hassle- building as well as land. Besides, free marketing places in the city by which space for reconstruction of sellers as well as buyers would be lodges should be provided. benefittedimmensely. • The proposal for construction of • There will be more Income generation and pilgrim shelters nearest to the economic condition of local business man, Jagannath Temple should also be Bojhias, Sebaks will increase due to more planned by the Government. inflow of devotees. • Distribution of Mahaprasad shall be made in a planned & hygienic manner. • Promotion and products done by local artisans will improve due to inflow of more tourists. • Provision of shoes stand/Locker facility by getting space around temple for devotees will solve the long-standing issues of devotees.

5.3 Cultural Impacts

Table 26: Likely Cultural Impacts of the Project

Cultural Benefits Cultural Costs • The main boundary Wall of Shree Jagannath temple • Ritual based head shavings (MeghanadPachery), would be more visible to the are done outside the public and pilgrims which was not previously eye- temple premises from catching to them. western as well as • The historical importance and cultural significance of southern sides. MeghanadPacheri would be realized by the visitors • Till getting alternative through seeing its artistic majesty,grandeur beauty places for the said purpose, and gigantic structure. there may be temporary • Owing to more area around Shree Jaganath temple, inconveniencies. tourists and pilgrims can spend more quality time • There should be provison which was not possible previously due to congestion for the creation of a and heavy crowd. separate venue for this • Due to more open and free space around Shree purpose. Jagannath temple, cultural programme like “Bhajan • There should also be Sandyas”, “Odishi Dance” etc. on special festivals facilities like water and could be better celebrated. sitting arrangements. • Toilet, drainage facility for devotees will improve the hygienic condition around the temple area.

5.4 Environmental Impacts

Table 27: Likely Environmental Impacts

Environmental Benefits Environmental costs • The project emphasizes dedicated Solid • After 75-meter security zone, and Waste Management Plan which would help consequently to be built up concrete area to get rid of unhygienic situation in the is expected to emit more heat in temple vicinity of temple area. surroundings, as pointed out by the local • Apart from it, there will not be water logging inhabitants. around temple areas. • It is proposed that there should be mini • Due to the upcoming project, there would plantations with mini park as well as eco- be more cleanliness around Shree friendly and tourist-friendly facilities Jagannatha Temple, Puri. should be created which will be a better • The outsiders’ impressions with regard to environment conservation practice in the the cleanliness in the vicinity of Shree iconic city,Puri. Jagannath temple would be better promoted. • Due to possible decongestion around the temple area as a result of the coming project, people will feel relaxed at the temple area.

Section-2 Social Impacts Management Plan (SIMP) Considering the broad areas of concern, mitigation measures are suggested under SIMP Matrix as shown in table- 27.

Table 28: Social Impact Management Plan (SIMP) matrix

Sl. Areas of Concern Mitigation Measures Responsible Agency A Social Issues and concerns 1. Some of the households doing Alternative shopping spaces may Govt. of Odisha business from their homes by be arranged under R/R Plan. opening shops are likely to lose their income and employment in the short run. 2. Possible loss of vending space A vending zone may be created. Puri Municipality / for street vendors. Govt. of Odisha

3. Protection of indigenous Temple Security Committee may Temple knowledge for security be formed by involving local Administration/ Govt. enhancement and Pilgrim experienced Sevayats and of Odisha control / management Monasteries’ Managers.

4 Provision of hospitability to the Sufficient accommodation facilities Temple tourists and pilgrims with a with differential tariff provisions Administration/ Govt. cheaper rate. with local hospitability and honesty of Odisha along with trained authorized guides. 5 Loss of social bonding and Creation of community centres at Govt. of Odisha fraternity the place of relocation. 6 Vedic and Sanskrit education For protecting Sanskrit/Vedic Govt. of Odisha free of cost to the aspiring education, a similar type of children institutional set up may be created for furthering Sanskrit and Vedic studies.

7 Loss of “Gosalas” Promotion of a Gosala to relocate Govt. of Odisha the existing cows at different monasteries. B Economic Concerns 8 Shortage of lodging space as a Lodge owners need to be Govt. of Odisha result of dismantling number encouraged to create lodging space of lodges in 75-meter security by constructing lodges at zone. alternative places in both sides of Grand Road by receiving appropriate compensation.

Sl. Areas of Concern Mitigation Measures Responsible Agency 9 Accommodation problem for More accommodation space for Govt. of Odisha women pilgrims in the month Kartik Pilgrims need to be created of kartik (Habisiyallies). at convenient location with subsidized tariff structure.

C Cultural Issues/ Concerns 10 Ritual based head savings are A Head saving place is to be Govt. of Odisha done outside the temple created with water facility and premises from western as well sitting arrangements. as southern sides.

D Environmental Concerns 11 Concrete flooring from Heat absorbent flooring as well as Govt. of Odisha MeghanadPacheriupto 75- boundary designs should be meter boundary is expected to introduced. emit more heat which may Green fencing along with have adverse impact on the concrete/stone fencing may be temple. introduced to minimize heat radiation. Grass transplantation, lawns etc should be done along the tourists’ paths.

Chapter-6: Proceedings of Public Hearing Meeting

The Social Impact Assessment Study for Land Acquisition of project “Development of Security Corridor around Shree Jagannath Temple, Puri” was notified u/s 4(1) of RFCTLA R & R Act-2013 videletter No- 28897,dated-24/09/2019 , A Public Hearing Meeting (PHM) u/s 5 of RFCTLA R & R Act- 2013 and U/r 14 of RFCTLA R & R rule 2016 was organised at ‘Niladri Bhakta Niwas’, Badadanda, Puri on 9th October 2020. The project affected persons particularly of BaseliSahi, ManikarnikaSahi, KalikadeviSahi, DolamandapSahi and ChudangaSahi had participated in the said meeting. The participants had shared the views sequentially in seven sessions. The meeting continued from 9.30 AM to 7.30 PM. Added to it, taking into account of Covid-19 related quarantine norms for the affected patients if any, a special virtual session through Google Talks was also organized. Accordingly, those people who could not attend the Public Hearing Meeting at the venue, they participated through online. At the very beginning of Meeting, a prayer dedicated to Lord Jagannath was made by all the participants. Subsequently, The Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) explained the reasons behind the Public Hearing Meeting. He requested the Additional District Magistrate (ADM), Puri to preside over the meeting. The Sub Collector, Puri; Deputy Administrator, Shree Jagannath Temple Administration; Assistant Executive Engineer(R & B), Additional Executive Officer, Puri Municipality were also present in the Public Hearing Meeting. The representatives of CTRAN Consulting Ltd, Bhubaneswar were present in the Public Hearing Meeting. In each of the session, The Draft Report of Social Impact Assessment Study for Security Zone Development Project was presented in a brief form.

Session-1: BaseliSahi, Ward No-2

1. Shri Biswa Mohan Mishra, legal heirs of Saraswati Mishra mentioned that his livelihood is dependent on rents received by sharing out shop spaces and providing tourist services. A part of his income was squeezed during 2015 land acquisition process and now it will be further squeezed during current land acquisition process. He states that lawful land acquisition compensation should provided to the land looser in land acquisition process. 2. Shri Divya Kumar Deba mentioned that due to the Security Zone Project, the livelihood of street vendors who were previously selling within the 75-metre zone is threatened. Some of the street vendors who now operate at beyond 75 metre area, there is continuous conflict of street vendors with back side shopkeepers. The back-side shopkeeper on the plea of business loss, opposes the street vendors activities in front of their respective shops. In this background, a vending zone may be constructed nearby temple area in Badadanda. 3. Shri KartikSahu mentioned that he had his business as a street vendor for last 23 years and now his business is lost. He suggested the R and R package under the project should have some provision for the welfare of the street vendors. 4. Smt. BasantaMohapatro, legal heirs of Lokanath Acharya and a resident of ward no-4 suggested that the land acquisition for the project should be done with lawful land acquisition compensation and R & R package for land losers. 5. Shri Debendra Kumar Mohanty, a resident of BasuliSahi lauded the project initiated by the Govt. of Odisha around Shree Jagannath Temple, He said that the project will help for the security of the temple and it will enhance the beauty of Puri and also indicated that due to the ongoing demolition drive, some of the buildings are still to be demolished although vacated by the land seller. Due to such incomplete demolition, anti-social activities are increasing in the neighbourhood area. So, required demolition process may be expedited. Further he added that one residential house of Mr Mohanty is coming within the 75 meters of the project. Lawful land acquisition and R & R package should be provided to him for acquisition of his land. 6. Shri Gobinda Chandra Mohanty, Secretary of “Shree Jagannath BhinnakshyamaSanstahn” thanked to the Govt. of Odisha for inception of project Security corridor around Shree Jagannath Temple. He also stated that the inflow of pilgrim increased few folds since the development of project around Shree Jagannath Temple before lockdown restriction. Further hesaid previously, “Shree Jagannath BhinnakshyamaSanstahn”, his NGO was operating its office in the 75-metre zone. Now, due to demolition of that building, the organisation office is shifted to a distant place. The main activity of the organisation is to provide all possible assistance to the People with Disability (PwD) who are coming as a tourist or pilgrim to Jagannath Dham. The organisation expresses that due to shifting of their office, they are not able to render optimum services to PwD tourists and pilgrims. The organisation requested project authorities to provide at least minimum office space nearby temple area, so that the organisation will be able to deliver best possible services to the people with disability. Following proposals were suggested by Shri Mohanty • Shree Jagannath Temple Administration and District administration should take initiatives for the people with disability pilgrims for hassle free Darsan of lord

Jagannath. The number of vehicles provided for transport of people with disability should increase as the tourist inflow is increasing day by day. • “NiladriGowsala” should be constructed for the displaced cattle’s from various Mathas around Shree Jagannath Temple. • One Cemetery for carcasses of animals should be constructed at a suitable place outside of the Puri town for cremation of Stray cattle’s and other animals. 7. SaratJaysingh, representative of NGO mentioned that on the top of continuously increasing tourist inflow and particularly sharp spikes of tourists’ inflow on special occasions, the creation of security zone project is indispensable and timely for the crowd control and management. He stated that Puri town is religious nerve centre of the world. He stated that during different time period in each year, lakhs of tourists come to Puri and the street vendors also provide innumerable shopping services to the tourists and considering such services of the street vendors, a dedicated vending zone may be constructed under the R/ R package. Besides, budget and very low-cost Tourist Rest Houses need to be created for providing staying facilities to budget tourists. He stated that for this purpose, existing BagalaDharmasala may also be renovated and refurbished. For rehabilitation and resettlement of the Mahantas of different Mathas (monasteries), the existing provisions of Temple Administration Act and Revenue DepartmentActsmay also suitable refer. Presently, it is observed that there is drainage overflow with 75 metre zone area due to clearance of structures by the District Administration, which should be checked. There should be “Gowsala” within 10-15 Kms radius of Puri town, as security of cows is a religious practice as per the cultural traditions in Puri town.Besides that, there should be cremation ground for the carcasses after the death of cattle’s and stray animals.

President-cum- Additional District Magistrate, Puri submitted that there are various rehabilitation measures under consideration of Govt. of Odisha like Street Vending Zone, Shelter house of cattle’s etc. he also added that the drainage and other issues created due to clearance of structures are temporary in nature. District Administration is not disturbing the core area of Mathas such as Deities, Sanctum Sanctorum, Gadi Ghara and Samadhu Stall etc of Mathas, only clearing the commercial and open spaces of Mathas. District Administration will follow all measures as prescribed in RFCTLAR & R Act-2013 for determination of Market value of land as well as determining R &R award to the project affected persons.

After the end of first session, the Deputy Administrator, Shree Jagannath Temple Administration presented vote of thanks and reiterated that in the land acquisition process for security zone project, land acquisition compensation and R & R assistance as declared by Govt. of Odisha keeping in mind of all the category of affected persons as per RFCTLA R & R Act-2013 will be beneficial to all.

Session-2: BaseliSahi, Ward No-3

1. Shri Debendra Kumar Mohanty, a resident of Basulisahi stated that the project is very much timely taking into account the needs of time. The design of the project is well thought-out by the government of Odisha. He stated that more than 80% land required for the project already purchased by the Govt. and remaining 20% land should be acquired as early as possible. Some peoples are spreading rumours around the project area for which some people are opposing it. He also stated the remains of the broken buildings are not yet cleared in certain parts. Efforts should be taken to clear the debris for convenience of local people. 2. Shri Rudra Prakash Panda stated that the Grand Road Puri, is under National High Way category. Resultingly the land acquisition process should follow both of the Acts – Land Acquisition process for highways as well as RFCTLARR Act, 2013. He suggested including the survey of minors, ladies and peoples with disabilities in the final publication of Social Impact Assessment. Further he suggested the land acquisition and rehabilitation and resettlement should be done as per the RFCTLAR & R Act-2013. 3. Smt. Minati Panda, a resident of Basulisahi stated that she wants the development of Shree Jagannath Temple through this project but due to this project they have lost their house, which was nearest to the temple. Since generations they were enjoying their house. She requested that they should be provided alternative plots or home soon after the 75-metre zone. She mentioned that no other land would be comparable to the land nearer to Shree Jagannath temple. 4. Shri Saroj Kumar Biswal mentioned that the security zone project should have functional much earlier. Since the project has started late, so the families who are losing land should accept the compensation package as decided by the project authorities and cooperate for the earliest completion of the project. He requested to provide jobs to unemployed youth of land loosing families and should be provided alternative plots near the Jagannath Temple. 5. Shri Raghunath Gochhikar stated that he and his other stake holders are going to lost 3 lodges and 21 shops from the project “Development of Security Heritage Corridor around Shree Jagannath Temple” . He added that the land acquisition compensation amount for the land acquired in 2015 is still deposited in the Court as the land looser approached for enhancement of land acquisition compensation.Due to the project he will be lost his lodging house and shops which are nearest to the temple. He requested that he should be compensated being provided a land inside Bagala Dharmsala being planned for allotment to the affected people. In response to Shri Gochhikar’s views, the president-cum-Additional District Magistrate, Purimentioned that while rehabilitating the lodges the built-up area will be taken into account and there is a separate R/R policy for the affected lodges. 6. Shri A. K Rout, representative of Laxmi Bhaban situated in Basulisahi mentioned that people’s opinion should be accepted in the process of land acquisition. He stated that the families who are settled for the purpose of business around Shree Jagannath Temple are displacED from the project. They should be rehabilitated at a place equivalent to the commercial importance of the place and also emphasised on the R & R package based on the built-up area of the lodge not on the permissible built up area of lodge. He questioned

the absence of Project Affected Family list in the booklet provided in the public hearing meeting. He suggested that due to strategic location of the acquired area, both National Highway Act and RFCTLAR & R Act 2013 should apply for land acquisition. He suggested whatever best will be obtained from any law, should be applied here for land acquisition. He further suggested that before demolition of their houses, there should be provision of resettlement of people and the place of resettlement should be known by the people whose houses are planned to be demolished under the project. President-cum- Additional District Magistrate submitted to the house that the list of Project Affected Families is in draft publication of Social Impact Assessment survey done by CTRAN consultancy which is available in this meeting as well as in the Office of Land Acquisition Officer, Security Zone, Municipality Puri, Sub-Collector Office Puri and Tahasildar Office Puri. The booklet which provided to each attendee is brief summary of the draft publication of Social Impact Assessment survey. He added that multiple acts cannot be applied for land acquisition of a single project. RFCTLAR&R Act-2013 is applying in this project for maximum benefits of the project affected persons. Regarding built up area confusion of the representative of affected person, He submitted that we are considering the total built up area for the R & R assistance, only permissible built up area would used for permission of construction of new lodges at new sites approved by PKDA, Puri. 7. Shri Badri Narayan Mahasuar stated that he had applied to the District Administration for direct purchase of land as Govt. of Odisha announces 10% incentive on the handover of land within 30 days of publication of notice u/s 4(1) of RFCTLAR&R Act-2013 but the district administration did not purchase the land from us.He demanded for better land acquisition compensation and R & R assistance for the acquisition of land.

President-cum- Additional District Magistrate submitted to the house that as the land is under judicial scrutiny so district administration unable to purchase the land through the way of direct purchase.

8. Shri DamodarGochhikar resident of Basulisahi stated as the land acquisition compensation amount for the land acquired in 2015 is still deposited in the Court as the land looser approached for enhancement of land acquisition compensation. Due to the project he will loose his lodging house and shops which are nearest to the temple. He hopes District administration should follow all the laws associated with land acquisition under RFCTLA R &R Act-2013. 9. Shri Jagadish Prasad Kar and Shri Purna Chandra Panda are suggested to acquire land with due procedure of law where the land is pending in different Courts. 10. Shri HarekrushnaKhuntia mentioned that the said project is very much essential for which land acquisition process should be completed at the earliest as 80 % land is already purchased by the district administration through the way of direct purchase.

After the end of session, the Deputy Administrator of Puri Temple Administration presented vote of thanks and stated that from the security point of view such a project was highly essential and people have cooperated it wholeheartedly.

Session-3: ManikarnikaSahi, Ward No-4

1. Shri Debendra Nath Brahmachari stated that some of the land recorded in the name of Shree Jagannath MahaprabhubijeShreeksetramarfat Mandir parichalana Committee, which are in possession of savayats and the land settlement under uniform policy of Shree Jagannath Temple Administration is pending.Such Sevayats of Shri Jagannath temple would be affected and the R/ R policy has not any special focus for the lands pending for settlement in the name of the Sevayats. Project authorities may introduce some provisions for smooth working of Sevayats. Deputy administrator (Revenue), SJTA submitted to the house that the pending settlement under uniform policy of such lands which are going to affected in this project are under active consideration of settlement committee of SJTA. 2. Shri Surendra Chandra Mania, a rented shop keeper of Bada Odia Matha shops located near ganduchourachhaka stated that the project is very good and he has whole hearted cooperation for the project. Due to this project, he has lost his shop. He expects that the project authorities would be kind enough to relocate at least a 10ft*10ft room beyond the 75-metre zone. Land Acquisition Officer (R & R), Security zone submitted in this regard that puri town is limited within 2km of range and maximum commercial units are centred near the Shree Jagannath Temple. It is the call of the time to expand the town for better management of livelihood and life dependent on Shree Jagannath Temple. For resettlement of the shops, there are provisions in R & R policy for this project approved by Govt. of Odisha for construction of new market complex within reasonable range from Shree Jagannath temple and the entire displaced shop keepers will be allotted shops as per their Resettlement and rehabilitation provisions. 3. Rabi Narayan Mahapatra of Manikarnikasahi stated that he had not received any land acquisition compensation in land acquisition of 2015 for Nabakalebar. He also pointed out that the land was not recorded in his name. It was recorded in the name of Shree Jagannath MahaprabhubijeShreekshetramarfat Mandir Parichalana committee. He added that he welcoming the project for the development of Puri town and no objection in the process of land acquisition for the project. He requested to compensate him for “Bharat Mahala” and that structure was cleared by the District Administration on unsafe ground of structure. 4. Shri BibhutiBhusan Behera, a resident of marnikarnikasahi intimated to house that he was not interested to sell his land to the District Administration through the way of direct purchase but he has no objection for land acquisition of the project. He added that rightful compensation and R & R assistance should be provided to the land losers. 5. Shri Raghunath Panda, president of trust of KapalMochan Dev mentioned that the land acquisition process should be completed at the earliest and the land acquisition compensation for the land of KapalMochan Dev should be deposited with the trust of KapalMochan dev.

President-cum- Additional District Magistrate submitted to the house that as the land of KapalMochan Dev is an endowment land. The land acquisition compensation will be deposited as per the instruction of Hon’ble Commissioner of endowments, Bhubaneswar.

After the end of session, the Deputy Administrator of Puri, Shree Jagannath Temple Administration presented vote of thanks and appreciated people’s cooperation for the project.

Session-4: ManikarnikaSahi, Ward No-9

1. Shri Raghunath Mohapatra complained that he had a lodge “Bharta Mahal” within 75 metre zone. In 2015 land acquisition process, a part of the building was demolished and due to improper compensation, there is ongoing court case. Meanwhile, in the ongoing land acquisition, the lodge is completely demolished. He requested for the quick disposal of the case. 2. SmtRinki Mohapatra had constructed house on a plot for which she did not have RoR. As that house got demolished, she became homeless and staying in a neighbourhood on rent. She is expecting that there should be some housing assistance from the project R/R scheme. President-cum- Additional District Magistrate submitted to the house that she should approach to the land acquisition Office, Security Zone in written about her grievances for proper disposal. 3. Shri PurastamSamantara stated that there are two plots 670 and 678 of Khata No-711 of Manikarnikasahi on which GelibaiThakurani is situated. Total area recorded in the name of Geli bai Thakurani is Ac. 0.130.recorded tenant in current settlement are GelibaiThakuranimarfatsamastaGramabasipakheNarasingh Mohanty & others. He complained that out of area Ac. 0130 an area of 0.015 of plot 678 was earlier recorded in the name of his ancestors but in last settlemet it is recorded in the name of Geli Bai Thakurani. The land acquisition compensation for plot no-678 should be awarded in his name.

Sub-collector-cum- Administrator (R & R) submitted to the house that Mr. Samantara should file revision case in Commissioner Court for correction of settlement issues. The land acquisition award should be done as per the Record of Right published u/s 11(1) notification of RFCTLA R & R Act-2013.If there will be any order regarding change in Record of Right of the plot No-678 at the time of land compensation award. It will be honoured at that time.

4. SmtManjulata Rout was getting her livelihood by doing business as a street vendor within 75 metre zone. She has lost her business completely. She is expecting that there should be some provision of livelihood restoration among the street vendors in the Rehabilitation and Resettlement plan for the vendors. 5. Narayan Mahasuar, president, Trust Board of Geli bai Thakurani lauded the security corridor project around Shree Jagannath temple. This is a very good project. There should be provision of rightful land acquisition compensation and R & R assistance as per law. He suggested widening the main three roads of Manikarnikasahi which leads towards the Shree Jagannath Temple for better crowd management. He also demanded land acquisition compensation of Geli bai Thakurani in the name of Geli Bai Thakurani Trust Board.

After the end of session, the Deputy Administrator of Puri Temple Administration presented vote of thanks and appreciated people’s cooperation for the project.

Session-5: KalikadebiSahi, Ward-12

1. Shri Sangarm Bastia, rented shop keeper of NarasinghAcharyMathamentioned that the famous Khaja tradition of Puri has started decades back by the Khaja shops functioning from NarasinghaAcharyMatha premises. Due to this project all khaja shops at NarasinghaAcharyMatha are lost. The project authorities should think of a “ Khaja Complex” for the product promotion of “Puri Khaja”. 2. Shri Basudeba Rath , rented shop keeper of NarasinghAcharyMatha mentioned that due to this project, there is loss of business as well as employment. Steps should be taken for the the restoration of business. 3. Shri Bijay Kumar Jena, a street vendor suggested to rehabilitate the displaced street vendors from the project area. He also acknowledged receipt of Rs. 15,000/- R & R assistance and requested to release the rest amount. 4. Shri Prabhas Kar was running a restaurant from a rented room in ManguMatha. Due to the demolition of that Math, he has lost his business and at present he is in uncertainty about his future employment and livelihood.

After the end of session, Additional Executive Officer, Puri Municipality gave vote of thanks by quoting from Mahabharat that land acquisition was first started at Khandav Van for the creation of Indraprastha, the capital of Pandavas.

Session-6: DolamandapSahi, Ward No-15

1. Shri Mahaprasad Nayak is employed by running a shop in the premises of Radha Ballabh Matha. He says that after Foni cyclone, followed by demolition of houses in the 75-metre zone and Covid-19 related lock down of temple, the business community in Puri have been pushed into livelihoods uncertainty. In this background, the R/R plan of the project should be very much helpful for the business community to revive their business. 2. Shri Narayan Singhari runs a tourist service provider office in the premises of Radha BallabhaMatha. In his opinion the R/R plan should be very much friendly to the business community. 3. Shri Brahmananda Nayak and Shri Jagannath Nayak rented shop keepers of Radha BallabhaMatha stated that rehabilitation and resettlement should happen first and it should be followed by house demolition. 4. Shri Himanshu Sekhar Mishra, a student of Radha BallabhaMatha representing Mahantaof Radha BallabhaMathastated that those mathas which are already broken, the ancient relics obtained from these Mathas should be well preserved. Besides, some minimum income for these mathas should be ensured so that the Mathas could be able to maintain minimum services. 5. Shri Kailash Chandra Nayak suggested for rehabilitation and resettlement of shop keepers as per existing law.

After the end of session, Additional Executive Officer, Puri Municipality gave vote of thanks by saying that land acquisition is very much indispensable for development projects.

Session-7: ChudangaSahi, Ward-17

1. Shri NabakishoreSahu stated that the people of Puri are very much peace loving. For the sake of the Security Zone Project, people have voluntarily sold their land and about 90 percent of RoR holders’ families have already sold their land as required by the project. Considering the benefit sides of the project, he has given his views that land acquisition upto 100 metres might have been better. 2. Shri Narayan Ramanuj Dash, Mahanta of Uttara PraswaMatha emphasized on the construction of “Gowsalas” in the periphery of Puri town. He further mentioned that a lodge with all legality was functioning under the aegis of his Matha. Since that lodge was demolished as it was within 75 metre zone, an alternative place should be given to the matha for the construction of lodge, as it is planned for other lodges as per the provisions of the project’s R/R Policy. President-cum- Additional District Magistrate submitted to the house that the R & R assistance prvided to Mathas as per bipartite agreement between the Mahanta of Matha and the District Administration on the instruction of Hon’ble Commissioner of endowments, Bhubaneswar, Odisha. The redevelopment of Matha will include the type of losses occurred at the displaced site. 3. Dr.Bijay Ramanuja Dash,Mahanta of KattackiMatha stated that the project is very much timely and essential considering the day to day increase in the tourist inflow. He stated that keeping in view the project necessities, it was necessary to demolish Maths and it has been done. But, ancient relics and artefacts should be well preserved. He further emphasized that from religious perspectives, the pilgrims’ circumnavigation around Shree Jagannath temple is very much interwoven with the Math culture in Puri. 4. Shri Lalatendu Mohanty on behalf of TrimaniMathaand Srikanta Dash on behalf of Gopal Ballahavapointed out that the project is very much unique and it was a necessity also and he requsted to dispose of the pending case of Gopal Bhaban. 5. Monaj Kumar Pradhan stated that the rightful land acquisition compensation and R & R assistance should be provided to the project affected persons. 6. Shri Raghunath Gochhikar stated that the land acquisition compensation amount for the land acquired in 2015 is still deposited in the Court as the land looser approached for enhancement of land acquisition compensation. Due to the project he will loose his lodging house and shops which are nearest to the temple. He requested that he should be compensated being provided a land inside Bagala Dharmsala being planned for allotment to the affected people. In response to Shri Gochhikar’s views, the president-cum-Additional District Magistrate, Puri mentioned that while rehabilitating the lodges the built-up area will be taken into account and there is a separate R/R policy for the affected lodges. After the end of session, Additional Executive Officer, PuriMunicipality gave vote of thanks. He mentioned that households, business houses, lodges and the different Mathas have well cooperated in the land acquisition process.

Photographs of Participants

Participant attended the public hearing meating

Annexure

Annexure-I: SIA Notification

Annexure-II: R & R Plan

Displacement Livelihood Loss Yes No Yes → Livelihood restoration by means of → Displaced PAFs /PAPs should creating scope for undertaking be provided with I cards, so same type of business. that they can easily approach → A new market complex may be to the temple without any created at a prominent place and hassle. the families losing shopping space → Due to distance from the may be provided shopping space. temple after relocation, → The PAFs dependent on income particularly the Sevayats, from lodges and are likely to be regularly coming to the displaced should be provided temple should be provided alternative land at Badadanda area with two-wheeler and four- so as to remain in their business. wheeler pass upto the temple. → The PAFs who are likely to lose → There should be provision of YatriSeva, steps may be taken to movement of Sevayats from resettle them at the nearest the place of relocation to the possible distance from the temple. temple site. No → PAFs immediately loosing income, → One-time settlement of the may be ensured minimum level of loss of all assets may be income support for a short period ensured. upto getting stabilized. → In order to upscale the business activities of PAFs, Banks may be approached to provide soft loans to PAFs.

Annexure-III: List of Affected Shops

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuBijeShreekhetra, MarphatUttarparshwaMathaEndament Trusty Board, Ba- Chudanga SailabalaPrus Raghunath 1 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi ty Prusty Chudanga Late Narayan 2 303 217 TikinaPrusty Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Prusty Chudanga Lokanath 3 303 217 Gita Panda Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Panda Chudanga Surendra Late Dhobi Lease 4 303 217 Shop 1 Sahi Pradhan Pradhan Holder Chudanga Ramachandra Late Arjuna Lease 5 303 217 Shop 1 Sahi Pradhan Pradhan Holder Chudanga Pradipta Late Dhobi Lease 6 303 217 Shop 1 Sahi Pradhan Pradhan Holder Chudanga Surendra GhanashyamP 7 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Kumar Prusty rusty Late Chudanga 8 303 217 Aparna Patra Sadananda Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Patra Chudanga Rabindra Late Rahasa 9 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Rabi Narayan Late Kesari 10 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Pratihari Nath Pratihari Chudanga Parbati Rabindra 11 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo (W/o) Chudanga Narayan Late Gopal 12 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Prusty Prusty Chudanga Late Gopal 13 303 217 Arjuna Prusty Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Prusty Chudanga HariharaPrust Late Gopal 14 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi y Prusty Basanti Late Chudanga 15 303 217 Kumar Raghunath Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Parichha Parichha Late Chudanga Arnnapurna 16 303 217 Managobinda Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo (W/o) Harish Chudanga 17 303 217 Chandra Sridhar Sahoo Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Chudanga Bhagaban Late Markanda 18 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga 19 303 217 Akura Sahoo Khali Sahoo Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Chudanga Laxmipriya Bhimsen 20 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Behera Behera (W/o) Late Chudanga Mamata 21 303 217 Ramachandra Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Dash Das (W/o) Chudanga Shyamasund Damodar 22 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi ar Sahoo Sahoo Late Surya Chudanga SaraswatiPari Narayan 23 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi chha Parichha (W/o) Chudanga Santosh Late Kasinath 24 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Kumar Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Jaya Chandra 25 303 217 Lokanath Dash Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Dash Satya Chudanga Sudarshan 26 303 217 Narayan Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Mangars Mangars Chudanga Durga Charan Late Kasinath 27 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sharma Sharma Chudanga Krushna Ch. Laxmidhara 28 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Chandra Late Banu 29 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sekhar Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Rajibalochan Narendranath 30 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Purna Chudanga Late Lokanath 31 303 217 Chandra Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Subash Late Chudanga 32 303 217 Chandra HadibandhuPa Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Panigrahi nigrahi Chudanga Sankarsan Kumardwaja 33 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Swain Swain Chudanga Late Nrusingha 34 303 217 Gopal Sahoo Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Late Chudanga Bhimsen 35 303 217 Haribandhu Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Late Arjuna 36 303 217 Minati Sahoo Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo (H/o) Chudanga Banamali Late Gunduchi 37 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Bishnupriya Basu Senapati 38 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Senapati (H/o) Homes Chudanga Gopinath Bhimsen Basti Plot 39 303 217 Sale deed ted 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo No 76, 77 Land 40 Chudanga 303 217 Sundari Das Lana Sana Das Sale deed Shop 1

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Sahi (H/o) Chudanga Late Gaurang Basti Plot 41 303 217 Baban Patra Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Patra No 65 Chudanga Prasanta Narayan 42 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Kumar Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Braja Kishor Late Babana 43 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Behera Behera Homes Basti Plot Chudanga Anupama Dinabandhu 44 303 217 Sale deed ted 1 No. 56, Sahi Senapati Senapati Land 57, 58 Chudanga Hata Kishor Late Lingaraj Basti Plot 45 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Behera Behera no.81 Chudanga Sankarsan Late Ananda Basti Plot 46 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Nayak Nayak No. 79 Late Chudanga 47 303 217 Sashi Bharati Laxmidhara Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Bharati Chudanga Manas Ku. BauriBandhuG 48 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Ghaturai haturai Late Chudanga Makhita 49 303 217 Ramachandra Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Behera Behera Late Chudanga Bela Rani 50 303 217 Gopabandhu Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Mallik Mallik Chudanga Dasarathi Late Damodar 51 303 217 Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Chudanga Manoranjan 52 303 217 Late Halu Pal Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Pal Chudanga Chitaranjan 53 303 217 Late Halu Pal Sale deed Shop 1 Sahi Pal Ashok Ku. Two shop Chudanga SuchitaSatap 54 303 217 Satapathy Sale deed Shop 3 and one Sahi athy (H/o) godown Umesh Chudanga Kotha Lease 55 303 217 Chandra Shop 1 Sahi Mohapatra Holder Mohapatra Two shop Chudanga S. Adiamma Lease 56 303 217 S. Baya Reddy Shop 3 and one Sahi Reddy Holder godown Chudanga Barendra LaatePurna Lease 57 303 217 Shop 1 Sahi Kumar Sahoo Ch. Sahoo Holder Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuBijeShreekhetra, MarphatUttarparshwaMathaEndament Trusty Board, Ba- Chudanga Krushna Ch. Natabara Lease 1 303 284 Lodge 1 9 rooms Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Holder Late Chudanga Biswanath Lease 2 303 284 Nababandhu Shop 1 Sahi Mohapatra Holder Mohapatra 3 Chudanga 303 284 DebarajMoha Late Lease Shop 1

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Sahi nty Gunanidhi Holder Mohanty Late Chudanga Lease 4 303 284 Babaji Dash Magtaram Shop 1 Sahi Holder Dash Chudanga Ramachandra Late Binod Lease 5 303 284 Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Holder Late Chudanga Pitambar Lease 6 303 284 Banchanidhi Shop 1 Sahi Mohapatra Holder Mohapatra Late Chudanga Anjan Kumar Lease 7 303 284 BhikariCharan Shop 1 Sahi Das Holder Das Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuBijeShreekhetra, MarphatUttarparshwaMathaEndament Trusty Board, Ba- Chudanga Simancha Late Balaram Lease Shop No 1 303 276 Shop 3 Sahi Patra Patra Holder 30, 35, 36 Laxmi Late Chudanga Lease Shop No . 2 303 276 Narayan Ramachandra Shop 1 Sahi Holder 39 Senapati Senapati Satya Late Chudanga Lease 3 303 276 Narayan Madhusudan Shop 1 Sahi Holder Senapati Senapati Late Chudanga Manas Lease Shop No. 4 303 276 Kalucharan Shop 2 Sahi Ranjan Sahoo Holder 31, 32 Sahoo Gopal Ch. Late Ram Chudanga Lease 5 303 276 Panda & Chandra Shop 1 Sahi Holder Nepal Panda Panda Chudanga Rabi Kishor Lease Ghanashy 6 303 276 Sarata Naik Shop 1 Sahi Naik Holder am Store Laxmidhar Chudanga Laxmidhar 7 303 276 Rented Shop 1 a Senapati Sahi Senapati Bhandar Shree Chudanga Rajesh RadheshyamC Lease Ganesh 8 303 276 Shop 1 Sahi Chanduka handuka Holder Textiles (5 rooms) Chudanga Debaraj Late Damodar Lease 9 303 276 Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Holder Shop No. Chudanga Saraswati Suresh Lease 10 303 276 Shop 1 4 (Khaja Sahi Pradhan Pradhan (H/o) Holder Dokana) Chudanga Ganesh Late Shyam Lease 11 303 276 Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sundar Sahoo Holder Chudanga Harihara Late Lokanath Lease 12 303 276 Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Sahoo Holder Chudanga Ramesh Ch. Late Prana Lease Chandan 13 303 276 Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo Krushna Sahoo Holder Cold Bar 14 Chudanga 303 276 Raghunath TikinaPrusty Lease shop & 4 2 shops

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Sahi Prusty Holder House and 2 House Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuBijeShreekhetraMarphatBijePuriMarphat Mandir ParichalanaKamiti Shree Mandira Puri, Ba- 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, Lease JashiBhoja 1 364/4 Jagadish Jashi Kirtan Jashi Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder nalaya 3 31,33 25, 26, 364, Parmanada Kalikadevi 27, Lease 2 364/4 Das Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder 3 Mohapatra 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, Ram Chandra Lease Hotel 3 364/4 Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, mohapatra Holder Sagar 3 31,33 25, 26, 364, Purna MahaLax Kalikadevi 27, Lease 4 364/4 Chandra Shop 1 miBhojnal Sahi 28,29,30, Holder 3 Mohapatra aya 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, Lease 5 364/4 Dilip Kumar Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder 3 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, Lease 6 364/4 Babuli Singh Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder 3 31,33 25, 26, Shree 364, Jaganatha Kalikadevi 27, Lease Jaganatha 7 364/4 Swami Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder Art 3 Mohapatra 31,33 emporium 25, 26, 364, Krushna Kalikadevi 27, Lease Kala 8 364/4 Chandra Das Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder Niketan 3 Mohapatra 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, BibhutiBhusa Lease 9 364/4 Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, nTripathy Holder 3 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, JaganathaPra Lease 10 364/4 Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, tihari Holder 3 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, Gajanan Lease 11 364/4 Shop 1 Bata India Sahi 28,29,30, Sahoo Holder 3 31,33 12 Kalikadevi 364, 25, 26, Bhagabati Lease Shop 1 Niladri

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Sahi 364/4 27, Puja Panda Holder Sweets 3 28,29,30, 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, Madan Das Lease Patanjali 13 364/4 Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Mohapatra Holder Store 3 31,33 25, 26, 364, Kalikadevi 27, Lease Kar 14 364/4 Prabhas Kara Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder Resturant 3 31,33 25, 26, 364, Rama Kalikadevi 27, Lease 15 364/4 Krushna Das Shop 1 Sahi 28,29,30, Holder 3 Mohapatra 31,33 Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuBijeShreekhetraMarphatBijePuriMarphat Mandir ParichalanaKamiti Shree Mandira Puri, Ba- Kalikadevi BalaramPadhi Printing 1 379 65 Radha Padhi Rented Shop 1 Sahi / Gopal Padhi Press Iswar Singh / Kalikadevi Printing 2 379 65 Kelu Chandra Radha Padhi Rented Shop 1 Sahi Press Behera Kalikadevi Sangram Khaja 3 379 65 RathaBastiya Rented Shop 1 Sahi Bastiya Shop Kalikadevi BiswanathaRat Khaja 4 379 65 BijayaRatha Rented Shop 1 Sahi ha Shop Kalikadevi Brajaraja M Bharat Kumar Khaja 5 379 65 Rented Shop 1 Sahi ohapatra Mohapatra Shop Kalikadevi Pramod 6 379 65 Sridhar Singh Rented Shop 1 Sahi Kumar Singh Late Kalikadevi Sarata Kumar Khaja 7 379 65 BalabhadraPra Rented Shop 1 Sahi Pratihari Shop tihari Khaja Kalikadevi Baidnatha Janaka Puja 8 379 65 Rented Shop 1 Store Sahi Puja Panda Panda Room Rashmi Kalikadevi Manguli 9 379 65 Ranjan Rented Shop 1 Milk Shop Sahi Behera Behera Kalikadevi BishnupriyaS Varitey 10 379 65 U Sahu Rented Shop 1 Sahi ahu Store Kalikadevi Rosan Kumar 11 379 65 Rented Shop 1 Sahi Rana Kalikadevi Lingaraj 12 379 65 Rented Shop 1 Sahi Mohapatra Kalikadevi Ramakanta 13 379 65 Rented Shop 1 Sahi Mohapatra Kalikadevi Gangadhar 14 379 65 Rented Shop 1 Sahi Sahoo

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Sharma Kalikadevi BithalBishnu 15 379 65 Rented Shop 1 Sahi Palki Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuBijeShreekhetraMarphat Mandir ParichalanaKamiti Shree Mandir Puri, Ba- Manikarni Narayana Raghunath Bhoga 1 737 663 Rented Shop 1 kaSahi Saho Saho Dukan Manikarni MadhabaMa JaykrushnaMa Stationary 2 737 663 Rented Shop 1 kaSahi hasuar hasuar Shop Manikarni Bhoga 3 737 663 Sarata Panda Rama Panda Rented Shop 1 kaSahi Dukan Laxmi Manikarni Banana 4 737 663 Narayana Krushna Saho Rented Shop 1 kaSahi Shop Sahu Manikarni KabitaSubud 5 737 663 Rented Shop 1 kaSahi hi Shree KapalamochanDeba, BijeNijagaon, MarphatBalaram Panda, Harekrushna Panda, F- Brahman, Ba- Nijagaon Kudua Krushna Store Manikarni 770, 1 664, 665 Chandra Rented Shop 2 room & kaSahi 772 Behera Tiffin Shop Manikarni 770, Sukadev Das Shoe 2 664, 665 Rented Shop 1 kaSahi 772 Mohapatra Stand Silver Manikarni 770, Pradeep 3 664, 665 Rented Shop 1 Ornament kaSahi 772 Kumar Naik shop Subhash Manikarni 770, 4 664, 665 Chandra Rented Shop 1 Handicraft kaSahi 772 Nayak Saroj Manikarni 770, 5 664, 665 Chandra Rented Shop 1 Handicraft kaSahi 772 Nayak Manikarni 770, Laxmidhar 6 664, 665 Rented Shop 1 Handicraft kaSahi 772 Nayak Bhakta Manikarni 770, 7 664, 665 Bachala Rented Shop 1 Handicraft kaSahi 772 Nayak Manikarni 770, Sanjukta 8 664, 665 Rented Shop 1 Handicraft kaSahi 772 Nayak Manikarni 770, Rajlaxmi Shoe 9 664, 665 Rented Shop 1 kaSahi 772 Nayak Stand Kailash Manikarni 770, 10 664, 665 Chandra Rented Shop 1 Handicraft kaSahi 772 Nayak Ramesh Manikarni 770, Chandra 11 664, 665 Rented Shop 1 Handicraft kaSahi 772 Nayak

Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuBijeShreekhetraMarphat Mandir ParichalanaKamiti Shree Mandir Puri, Ba-

Sl. Name of Khata Plot No Shop owners Fathers Name Sale deed/ Type Unit Remarks No. the Mouza No Name Lease / of rented / Struct RoR ure Manikarni Shoe 1 699 Hema Jena Rented Shop 1 kaSahi Stand Manikarni Bhoga 2 699 Rakesh Giri Rented Shop 1 kaSahi Shop Manikarni Laxmidhara Shoe 3 699 Rented Shop 1 kaSahi Swain Stand Manikarni Brundabana Grocery 4 699 Rented Sop 1 kaSahi Panda Shop Manikarni Ramakrushna Khaja 5 699 Rented Sop 1 kaSahi Panigrahi Shop Manikarni Ramachandra Tea and 6 699 Rented Sop 1 kaSahi Swain Snacks Manikarni Khaja 7 699 Mitu Nayak Rented Sop 1 kaSahi Shop Manikarni Harihar Shoe 8 699 Rented Sop 1 kaSahi 944, 945, Nayak Stand Manikarni 946, 947, Mamata 9 699 Rented Sop 1 Pana Shop kaSahi 949, 950 Swain Manikarni Deepak 10 699 Rented Sop 1 Tea Stall kaSahi Nayak Manikarni Santosh Electrical 11 699 Rented Sop 1 kaSahi Kumar Sahoo Shop Manikarni Kuna Grocery 12 699 Rented Sop 1 kaSahi Panigrahi Shop Manikarni Basanta Electrical 13 699 Rented Sop 1 kaSahi Kumar Sahoo Shop Manikarni 14 699 Rabi Swain Rented Sop 1 Tea Stall kaSahi Cold Manikarni Rajkishor 15 699 Rented Sop 1 drinks kaSahi Pradhan shop Manikarni Madan 16 699 Rented Sop 1 Saloon kaSahi Mohan Barik

Annexure-IV: List of Affected Lodges

Land Sl. Built up Name of the RoR Area N Lodge Name Mouza Khata Plot No. area (sq Holder (in o. ft.) Acre) Gangadhar Assam 1 Mohapatra and BaseliSahi 640 970, 971 0.103 17996.75 JatriNivas others 974, 975, Naba Kishore Kar 2 Shimla Bhavan BaseliSahi 260 1219, 0.037 4731.05 and others 1222 3 Bishnu Bhavan HarekrushnaKhuntia BaseliSahi 554 969 0.104 11864 4 Braja Dham H. Khuntia BaseliSahi 552 1215 0.080 5050.4 Gobinda 5 BiswanathKhuntia BaseliSahi 144 977 0.020 4480.97 Bhavan Harekrushna Jagannath Pattnaik - 6 BaseliSahi 207 723 0.049 5966.3 lodge Harekrushna lodge 786/16 902/154 7 Khuntia Lodge Batakrushna Mudra BaseliSahi 0.008 1025.06 8 0 705 Kalicharan BibhutiBhusan 706 8 BaseliSahi 426 0.087 7071.9 Lodge Mishra 707 708 901/132 7 900,899/ 1388,903 703 Srinath Khuntia /1389 420 Kasinath Pravati Kumari Devi, 900/138 9 BaseliSahi 0.059 6305.33 Bhawan JayalaxmiKhuntia 2,899/13 786/23 BijaylaxmiKhuntia 83,903/1 429 384 899,903, 900/139 0 Laxmibhawan Harekrushna Rout 10 BaseliSahi 666 878 0.040 4787.6 Lodge Raghunath Rout Maa Shubadra 11 Raghunath Pal BaseliSahi 307 880 0.023 2513.02 Lodge

Land Sl. Built up Name of the RoR Area N Lodge Name Mouza Khata Plot No. area (sq Holder (in o. ft.) Acre) Sri MahateswariThakur Manipur aniBijeNijagruha 12 BaseliSahi 143 965 0.090 11649.4 Bhawan Lodge Maraft: Gopal Chandra Mohapatra & Others Prabhu Ashrid Golap Mani 13 BaseliSahi 161 715 0.056 1559 Lodge Mohanty 967, Pratihari 310, 14 PratihariNijog BaseliSahi 967/132 0.090 11722.26 Bhavan 180 2 One new Deepak Sahoo and 15 Lodge (Under BaseliSahi 522 968 0.051 9026.98 others construction) ChudangaSah 16 Gopal Bhavan Binapani Dash 40 134 0.114 5966.99 i Sri Jagannath Sana Mahaprabhumarfat Chudangasah 17 ChataMatha Mahanta Rama 298/75 280/746 0.064 4431.52 i Lodge Bhusan Das guru Ram charan dash Sri Jagannath MahaparavuBijeSrik ehtra Shubham Maraft : Mandira ChudangaSah 18 110 122/564 0.034 3038.46 Lodge Parichalana i Committee Possession: NabakishoreSahu 0.025 Sabita Dash ChudangaSah 6, 135, 19 Sri Kunja Lodge , 2355.5 Arun Kumar Dash i 298/48 135/723 0.021 0.185 Hajuri Prafulla ChudangaSah 20 UP Bhawan 133 123, 124 , 19290 Khuntia and others i 0.005 Sri Jayanarayan Raghunath Mohapatra and Sri ManikarnikaS 21 281 961 0.123 13982.49 Ashram Lodge Basudeba ahi Mohapatra

Land Sl. Built up Name of the RoR Area N Lodge Name Mouza Khata Plot No. area (sq Holder (in o. ft.) Acre) Shree Jagannath MahaprabhuShreeks hetraMft- Mahanta Sitaram Madhusudan das ManikarnikaS 22 421 1023 0.14 3680.6 Bhawan Guru Mahanta ahi Bhagabat Das of NijigaonsamilKausha lya Das Matha

Annexure-V: List of Affected Mathas

Sl Name Name of Mouza Name of The Mathas 1 Dakhinaparswa Math 2 BaseliSahi Gouri Gopal Jew 3 Sita Matha 4 Raghab Dash Math 5 Dakhinaparswa Math 6 ManikarnikaSahi Kapallochan Dev 7 Panjabi Matha 8 GelabaiThakurani 9 Emar Math 10 KalikadeviSahi ManguMatha 11 NrusinghaAcharyMatha 12 DolamandapSahi Radha Ballav Math 13 Rebasa Math 14 Utaraparswa Math 15 Bada Akhada Math 16 KatakiMatha 17 ChudangaSahi Habeli Math 18 Trimali Math 19 Sanachhata Math 20 Sankha Chakra Matha 21 ToraniaMatha

Annexure-VI: SIA Entitlement Matrix

93 1. Baseli Sahi Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 1 928 745 Government 0.250 0.037 Rasta Road 2 927 873/1 Anabadi 0.003 0.003 Gharab Shop 130 Rabi Naryan Self M 50 General Yes 236 ari Supakar 3 928 876 Government 0.035 0.035 Gharab House 1530 Refuse ari 4 928 886 Government 0.005 0.005 Rasta Road 5 927 894 Anabadi 0.010 0.010 Gharab House 440 Absent ari 6 928 895 Government 0.065 0.065 Rasta Road 7 928 897 Government 0.010 0.010 Rasta House 440 Prassana Ku. Self M 43 General Yes Mohanty 8 928 953 Government 0.162 0.162 Rasta Road 9 928 963/ Government 0.002 0.002 Bagayat Vacant 90 1235 land 10 928 966 Government 0.013 0.013 Rasta Sweeper passage 11 928 973 Government 0.016 0.016 Rasta Sweeper passage 12 928 983 Government 0.019 0.019 Gharab House 830 Sangram Brother M 56 General Yes ari Keshori Singh Bikram Kishore Brother M 54 General Yes Singh Ipsita Singh Daughter F 21 General Yes Sunita Singh Sister in F 42 General Yes law 13 928 987 Government 0.070 0.070 Rasta Vacant land 14 928 1023 Government 0.130 0.130 Rasta Road 15 928 1231 Government 0.010 0.010 Gharab Open ari space 16 928 1232 Government 0.001 0.001 Jalasaya Jalasaya 17 928 1233 Government 0.052 0.052 Rasta Road 18 836 688 Shree jagannath 0.016 0.012 Rasta Hadigoh mahaprabhu bije srikhetra eri road i

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) marphat, ba: mahanta damodar ramanuja das, guru laxmiprapana ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, ramachandra gochhikara, shyamsundar gochhikara, harihara gochhikara, f- gopinath gochhikar, ca- brahmana, ba- harachandi sahi 19 836 692 Shree jagannath 0.057 0.005 Gharab House 220 Biswanath Self M 55 General Yes mahaprabhu bije srikhetra ari Panda marphat, ba: mahanta Baidyanath Self M 42 General Yes damodar ramanuja das, Panda guru laxmiprapana Chandrakanta Son M 23 General Yes ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, Panda ramachandra gochhikara, Bhimsena Son M 21 General Yes shyamsundar gochhikara, Panda harihara gochhikara, f- gopinath gochhikar, ca- brahmana, ba- harachandi sahi 20 835 712 Shree jagannath 0.011 0.011 Rasta Road mahaprabhu bije srikhetra marphat dakhina parswa matha, endament trusty board, ba- 21 835 713 Shree jagannath 0.006 0.006 Gharab Shree 260 mahaprabhu bije srikhetra ari shree marphat dakhina parswa tarun matha, endament trusty ganapati board, ba- samiti temple 22 835 714 Shree jagannath 0.006 0.006 Gharab House 260 Kalpana Self F 64 General Yes mahaprabhu bije srikhetra ari Mohanty marphat dakhina parswa Shiladitya Son M 42 Yes ii

23 552 1215 Shree jagannath 0.170 0.080 Gharab Lodge 3490 Harekrushna Self M 58 General Yes mahaprabhu bije srikhetra ari Khuntia marphat, ba: ramaramana khuntia, f- hanumana khuntia, ca-brahmana, ba- harachandi sahi 24 856 882 Shree jagannath 0.030 0.028 Gharab Vacant mahaprabhu bije puri ari land- marphat shree jagannath sita temple managing matha committee puri, ba- tha- puri sahara 25 856 883 Shree jagannath 0.042 0.042 Gharab Vacant mahaprabhu bije puri ari land- marphat shree jagannath sita temple managing matha committee puri, ba- tha- puri sahara 26 856 884 Shree jagannath 0.022 0.022 Gharab Vacant mahaprabhu bije puri ari land- marphat shree jagannath sita temple managing matha committee puri, ba- tha- puri sahara 27 786 885 Shree jagannath 0.010 0.010 Gharab Shop 440 Prabhakar Self M 50 OBC Yes /67 mahaprabhu bije puri ari Pradhani marphat shree jagannath temple managing committee shree mandira puri, ba- 28 856 896 Shree jagannath 0.100 0.089 Gharab Shop 3880 Prasana Kumar Self M 42 General Yes mahaprabhu bije puri ari Mohanty iii

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) marphat shree jagannath temple managing committee puri, ba- tha- puri sahara 29 889 693 Radhamani patra, ha- 0.015 0.0035 Gharab House 150 Basanta Patra Self F 50 OBC Yes ramakrushna patra, ari-2 Nilakantha Son M 24 OBC Yes damodara patra, Patra shyamsundar patra, fa- ramakrushna patra, ca- kumuti, ba- nijagaon 30 710 694 Suresh chandra mahanty, f- 0.052 0.023 Gharab House 1000 Already sold out banabara mahanty, ca- ari-2 kaestha, ba- birapratapur, patana samilsidisapatna 31 557 698 Ramakanta mishra, f- ray 0.007 0.0015 Rasta House & 70 Already sold out bahadur lokanath mishra, shop ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon 32 557 699 Ramakanta mishra, f- ray 0.023 0.022 Gharab House & 960 Already sold out bahadur lokanath mishra, ari-2 shop ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon 33 557 700 Ramakanta mishra, f- ray 0.024 0.024 Gharab House & 1050 Already sold out bahadur lokanath mishra, ari-2 shop ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon 34 557 701 Ramakanta mishra, f- ray 0.025 0.025 Gharab House & 1090 Already sold out bahadur lokanath mishra, ari-2 shop ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon 35 557 702 Ramakanta mishra, f- ray 0.020 0.020 Gharab House & 870 Already sold out bahadur lokanath mishra, ari-2 shop ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon 36 557 703 Ramakanta mishra, f- ray 0.036 0.036 Gharab House & 1570 Already sold out bahadur lokanath mishra, ari-2 shop ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon

37 667 704 Satyanarayan das, f- 0.030 0.030 Gharab House & 1300 Already sold out jagannath das, ca- karana, ari-2 shop

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) ba- nijagaon 38 426 705 Bibhuti bhusan mishra, f- 0.026 0.026 Gharab Lodge 1130 Already sold out kalicharan mishra, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon 39 426 706 Bibhuti bhusan mishra, f- 0.013 0.013 Gharab Lodge 560 Already sold out kalicharan mishra, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon 40 426 707 Bibhuti bhusan mishra, f- 0.012 0.012 Gharab Lodge 520 Already sold out kalicharan mishra, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon 41 426 708 Bibhuti bhusan mishra, f- 0.036 0.036 Gharab Lodge 1570 Already sold out kalicharan mishra, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon 42 648 709 Lokanatha acharya, f- 0.030 0.030 Gharab Shop 1300 Biswamohan Self M 59 General No gopala acharya, saraswati ari-2 Mishra mishra, h- umakanta Swati Mishra Daughter F 19 General No mishra, ca- brahmana, ba- nijigaon 43 648 710 Lokanatha acharya, f- 0.037 0.017 Gharab House 740 Biswamohan Self M 59 General Yes gopala acharya, saraswati ari-2 Mishra mishra, h- umakanta Swati Mishra Daughter F 19 General Yes mishra, ca- brahmana, ba- nijigaon 44 786 711 Dhaneswar datta 0.016 0.016 Gharab Homeste 690 Dhaneswardutt Self M 48 General No /16 mahapatra, f- jagannath ari-2 d land Mahapatra 5 datta mahapatra, ca- karana, ba- paschimadwara baseli sahi, bhagirathi mallik, f- paramananda mallik, ca- khandayat, ba- jagannathpur chalishabatia, tha- chandanapur

46 471 716 Rina padhi, h- balakrushna 0.021 0.021 Gharab House 910 Already sold out padhi, gadadhara padhi, ari-2 lokanath padhi, bijaya laxmi padhi, f- balakrushna padhi, ca- brahman, ba- nijigaon 47 492 717 Ramachandra ray, f- udaya 0.024 0.024 Gharab House 1040 Already sold out nath ray, ca- khyatriya, ba- ari-2 nijigaon 48 358 718 Banamali panda, f- 0.028 0.028 Gharab House & 1210 Already sold out madhusudan panda, ca- ari-2 shop brahmana, ba- nijigaon 49 121 719 Gangadhara datta, f- 0.028 0.028 Gharab House 1210 Already sold out sadasiba datta, ca- bania, ari-2 ba- nijigaon 50 682 720 Sarata chandra das, subash 0.028 0.028 Gharab House 1220 Already sold out chandra das, f- madhaba ari-2 das, ca- karana, ba- nijigaon 51 561 721 Ramesh chandra hota, f- 0.028 0.028 Gharab House & 1220 Already sold out musa hota, ca- brahmana, ari-2 shop ba- nijigaon 52 39 722 Manorama pattnayak, h- 0.045 0.042 Gharab House 1830 Already sold out manamohan pattnayak, ari-2 deepak pattnayak, subrata pattnayak, madhusmita mahanty, f- manamohan pattnayak, ca- karana, ba- nijigaon

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 53 207 723 Jagannath pattnayak, f- 0.105 0.049 Gharab Lodge 2130 Already sold out khetramohan pattnayak, ca- ari-2 karana, ba- kesharapur (cuttack) 54 587 866 Ramachandra gochhikar, 0.063 0.049 Gharab Lodge 2130 Raghunath Self M 56 General Yes shyam sundar gochhikar, ari-2 (raghuna Ghochikar harihara gochhikar, f- th atithi Syama sundar Self M 78 General Yes gopinath gochhikar, ca- vihar Goochikar brahman, ba- nijigaon lodge) Damodar Self M 45 General Yes Goochikar Anil Goochikar Brother M 42 General 55 587 867 Ramachandra gochhikar, 0.011 0.011 Gharab Lodge 480 Raghunath Self M 56 General Yes shyam sundar gochhikar, ari-2 (raghuna Ghochikar harihara gochhikar, f- th atithi Syama Sundar Self M 78 General Yes gopinath gochhikar, ca- vihar Goochikar brahman, ba- nijigaon lodge) Damodar Self M 45 General Yes Goochikar Anil Goochikar Brother M 42 General 56 57 868 Kaliprasad das, f- birata 0.024 0.024 Gharab House 1040 Already sold out kishor das, ca- karana, ba- ari-2 nijigaon 57 587 869 Ramachandra gochhikar, 0.018 0.018 Gharab Lodge 780 Raghunath Self M 56 General Yes shyam sundar gochhikar, ari-2 (raghuna Ghochikar harihara gochhikar, f- th atithi Syama sundar Self M 78 General Yes gopinath gochhikar, ca- vihar Goochikar brahman, ba- nijigaon lodge) Damodar Self M 45 General Yes Goochikar Anil Goochikar Brother M 42 General 58 587 870 Ramachandra gochhikar, 0.081 0.081 Gharab Lodge 3530 Raghunath Self M 56 General Yes shyam sundar gochhikar, ari-2 (raghuna Ghochikar harihara gochhikar, f- th atithi Syama sundar Self M 78 General Yes gopinath gochhikar, ca- vihar Goochikar brahman, ba- nijigaon lodge) Damodar Self M 45 General Yes Goochikar Anil Goochikar Brother M 42 General Yes vii

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 59 588 871 Ramachandra gochhikar, 0.033 0.033 Gharab Lodge 1440 Raghunath Self M 56 General Yes shyam sundar gochhikar, ari-2 (raghuna Ghochikar harihara gochhikar, f- th atithi Syama sundar Self M 78 General Yes gopinath gochhikar, ca- vihar Goochikar brahman, ba- nijigaon lodge) Damodar Self M 45 General Yes Goochikar Anil Goochikar Brother M 42 General Yes 60 587 872 Ramachandra gochhikar, 0.150 0.150 Gharab Lodge 6534 Raghunath Self M 56 General Yes shyam sundar gochhikar, ari-2 (raghuna Ghochikar harihara gochhikar, f- th atithi Syama sundar Self M 78 General Yes gopinath gochhikar, ca- vihar Goochikar brahman, ba- nijigaon lodge) Damodar Self M 45 General Yes Goochikar Anil Goochikar Brother M 42 General Yes 61 902 874 Shree bhagabati thakurani, 0.007 0.007 Gharab Shop 300 Srimanjal Self M 39 OBC No ba- nijigaon, maa samasta ari-2 Behera gramabasinka pakhe Suryanarayan Self M 47 OBC No sabhapati and sampadaka Behera bhagabati kote akhada, ba- Pankaj kumar Self M 42 OBC No Behera 62 902 875 Shree bhagabati thakurani, 0.037 0.037 Debasta Temple 1620 ba- nijigaon, maa samasta li (shree gramabasinka pakhe bhagaba sabhapati and sampadaka ti bhagabati kote akhada, ba- thakura ni) 63 587 877 Ramachandra gochhikar, 0.009 0.008 Rasta Lodge 350 Raghunath Self M 56 General Yes shyam sundar gochhikar, (Raghun Ghochikar harihara gochhikar, f- ath Syama sundar Self M 78 General Yes gopinath gochhikar, ca- Atithivih Goochikar brahman, ba- nijigaon ar) Damodar Self M 45 General Yes Goochikar Anil Goochikar Brother M 42 General

64 666 878 Harekrushna rout, 0.040 0.040 Gharab Lodge 1740 Pradeep Rout Self M 60 General Yes

viii

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) raghunath rout, f- ari-2 (Laxmi Pratik Rout Son M 27 General Yes laxmikanta rout, ca- Bhaban) Swastik Rout Son M 25 General Yes khandayat, ba- nijigaon & house Swagatika Rout Daughter F 22 General Yes samili paschimadwara Samaptika Rout Daughter F 19 General Yes 65 530 879 Mohana das, mo- kundana 0.021 0.021 Gharab House 910 Already sold out mahari, ca- karana, ba- ari-2 nijigaon 66 307 880 Raghunath pala, f- jati pala, 0.025 0.023 Gharab House, 3272. Already sold out ca- teli, ca- markandeswara ari-2 Lodge & 46 sahi Shop 67 581 881 Saroj kumar biswal, f- jyoti 0.021 0.020 Gharab House 870 Refuse mohan biswal, ba- ari-2 (Refuse) ambiligaon, tha- konark ha, ba- nijigaon 68 114 887 Ananga manjari das, h- 0.027 0.027 Gharab House 1180 Already sold out damodara das, naba kishor ari-2 das, braja kishor das, raja kishor das, f- damodara das, ca- karana, ba- behera lane, tha- baseli sahi 69 113 888 Ananga manjari das, h- 0.019 0.019 Gharab House 820 Already sold out damodara das, naba kishor ari-2 das, braja kishor das, raja kishor das, f- damodara das, ca- karana, ba- behera lane, tha- baseli sahi 70 565 889 Madan mohan pradhan, f- 0.001 0.001 Gharab House 40 Already sold out nilakantha pradhan, ca- ari-2 chasa, ba- nijigaon samili behera gali 71 565 890 Madan mohan pradhan, f- 0.008 0.008 Gharab House 350 Already sold out nilakantha pradhan, ca- ari-2 chasa, ba- nijigaon samili behera gali

76 432 898 Arjuna sahu, f- arta sahu, 0.012 0.006 Gharab House 260 Already sold out ba- markandeswara sahi ari-2 samili chatiapada lane, puri town 77 429 899 Bijaya laxmi khuntia, h- 0.003 0.003 Gharab Lodge 130 Already sold out narasingha khuntia, ca- ari-2 (Kasinat sevak brahmana, ba- h harachandi sahi Bhaban)

78 428 900 Prabhati kumari debi, h- 0.006 0.006 Gharab Lodge 260 Already sold out trinath khuntia, ca- sevak ari-2 (Kasinat brahmana, ba- harachandi h sahi Bhaban)

81 429 903 Bijaya laxmi khuntia, h- 0.008 0.008 Gharab Lodge 350 Already sold out narasingha khuntia, ca- ari-2 sevak brahmana, ba- harachandi sahi

82 147 904 Bhitara sebayata nijoga 0.014 0.014 Gharab House 610 Already sold out kamiti marphat: ba: ari-2 gopinath pujapanda, f- ramachandra pujapanda, jambeswar kara, f- krushna chandra kara, ca- brahman, ba- harachandi sahi 83 147 905 Bhitara sebayata nijoga 0.021 0.021 Gharab House 920 Already sold out kamiti marphat: ba: ari-2 gopinath pujapanda, f- ramachandra pujapanda, jambeswar kara, f- krushna xi

88 314 910 Bishnupriya khuntia, h- 0.013 0.013 Gharab House 560 Already sold out jambeswar khuntia, ca- ari-2 sevak brahman, ba- khuntia nivash hatisala lokanath road

89 147 911 Bhitara sebayata nijoga 0.004 0.004 Rasta House 170 Already sold out kamiti marphat: ba: gopinath pujapanda, f- ramachandra pujapanda, jambeswar kara, f- krushna chandra kara, ca- brahman, ba- harachandi sahi xii

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 90 583 912 Shree gouri gopal jiu bije 0.023 0.017 Gharab House 740 Subhadra Self F 73 General Yes nijagruha, marphat: ba: ari-2 Nanda khetramohan nanda, f- Khetra mohan Son M 49 General Yes bhubanamohan nanda, Nanda subhadra nanda, h- bhubanamohan nanda, ca- brahman, ba- nijagaon 91 583 913 Shree gouri gopal jiu bije 0.016 0.016 Gharab House 690 Subhadra nanda Self F 73 General Yes nijagruha, marphat: ba: ari-2 Khetramohan Son M 49 General Yes khetramohan nanda, f- Nanda bhubanamohan nanda, subhadra nanda, h- bhubanamohan nanda, ca- brahman, ba- nijagaon 92 583 914 Shree gouri gopal jiu bije 0.032 0.013 Gharab House 560 Subhadra Self F 73 General Yes nijagruha, marphat: ba: ari-2 Nanda khetramohan nanda, f- Khetramohan Son M 49 General Yes bhubanamohan nanda, Nanda subhadra nanda, h- bhubanamohan nanda, ca- brahman, ba- nijagaon 93 901 955 Lokanath dash, f- damodara 0.005 0.001 Gharab Beyond 40 dash, ca- brahman, ba- ari-2 75m SIA nijigaon zone, (NA) 94 377 956 Ajaya kumar 0.017 0.002 Gharab Beyond 90 dattamahapatra, f- lakanath ari-2 75m SIA dattamahapatra, puspita zone, dattamahapatra, h- ajaya (NA) kumar dattamahapatra, ca- sevak brahman, ba: nijigaon 95 387 957 Bijaya kumar Gharab Beyond dattamahapatra, f- ari-2 75m SIA nilakantha dattamahapatra, zone sunitarani dattamahapatra, (NA) h- bijaya kumar xiii

99 510 961 Mana ramachandra 0.011 0.011 Gharab House 480 Already sold out mohapatra, f- ganesh ari-2 mohapatra, ca- chasa, ba- nijigaon 100 896 962 Ramachandra mohapatra, f- 0.011 0.011 Gharab House 480 Already sold out ganesh mohapatra, ca- ari-2 chasa, ba- nijigaon 101 248 963 Sidheswar rout, 0.026 0.026 Gharab House, 2050. Prasanta kumar Self M 48 General Yes chittaranjan rout, narayan ari-2 Lodge & 12 Mohanty rout, f- daitari rout, ca- Shop Jyoti Mohapatra Self F 38 General Yes khandayat, ba- Sakuntala Mother F 78 General Yes balabhadrapur (chhatra Mohanty bazar) cuttack town, tha- Niharika Sister F 30 General Yes madhupatna, dist: cuttack Mohanty Bishnu charan Son M 24 General Yes Mohapatra Prasana Brother M 45 General Yes Mohanty Bhabani sankar Son M 22 General Yes Mohapatra

xiv

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) Mahesh Son M 19 General Yes Mohapatra Prakash Brother M 40 General Yes Mohanty 102 248 964 Sidheswar rout, 0.019 0.019 Gharab House 830 Prasanta Self M 48 General Yes chittaranjan rout, narayan ari-2 Mohanty rout, f- daitari rout, ca- Sakuntala Mother F 78 General Yes khandayat, ba- Mohanty balabhadrapur (chhatra Niharika Sister F 30 General Yes bazar) cuttack town, tha- Mohanty madhupatna, dist: cuttack Prasana Brother M 45 General Yes Mohanty Prakash Brother M 40 General Yes Mohanty 103 310 967 Secretary pratihari nizoga 0.045 0.045 Gharab Lodge- 1960 Already sold out arnnadana bhoga kamiti ari-2 Pratihari bhitara baikunthadhama Bhaban puri 104 180 967/1 Secretary pratihari nizoga 0.045 0.045 Gharab Lodge- 1960 Already sold out 322 arnnadana bhoga kamiti ari-2 Pratihari bhitara baikunthadhama Bhaban puri 105 522 968 Deepak kumar sahu, f- 0.057 0.051 Gharab Lodge 2220 Already sold out muralidhara sahu, ari-2 jyoshnarani sahu, h- narayan sahu, rajeswari sahu, rishikesh sahu, f- narayan sahu, ca- gudia, ba- choudhuri bazar, cuttack, tha- lalbagh, ba- nijigaon 106 554 969 Harekrushna khuntia, f- 0.115 0.104 Gharab Shop & 16487 Already sold out ramaraman khuntia, ca- ari-2 lodge .31 brahman, ba- nijigaon (Bishnu bhawan)

xvi

xvii

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 112 368 976 Balaram dash, f- phakira 0.014 0.014 Gharab House 610 Already sold out dash, ca- baistamba, ba- ari-2 nijigaon 113 144 977 Hajuri biswanath khuntia, f- 0.020 0.020 Gharab House 870 Already sold out hajuri gobinda chandra ari-2 khuntia, ca- brahman, ba- nijigaon 114 263 978 Narasingha subudhi, f- 0.011 0.011 Gharab House & 470 Already sold out raghunath subudhi, ca- ari-2 shop gopala, ba- nijigaon gandua chaura 115 449 978/1 Susanta kumar panda, 0.009 0.009 Gharab House 390 Already sold out 337 birupakhya panda, f- ari-2 krushna chandra panda, niharika panda, h- sukanta kumar panda, ca- brahman, ba- chhatrapur, tha- chhatrapur, sujata panda, f- patitapabana panda, ca- brahman, ba- brahmapur pada, daluasahi, tha- brahmapur, dist. Ganjam 116 154 979/1 Gobardhana subudhi, f- 0.011 0.011 Gharab Shop & 480 Gobardhan Self M 75 OBC Yes 336 raghunath subudhi, ca- ari-2 house subudhi gopala, ba- nijigaon samili Gopal subudhi Son M 42 OBC Yes gandua chaura Gokula subudhi Son M 38 OBC Yes 117 395 979 Bamana subudhi, f- 0.014 0.014 Gharab House 610 Already sold out raghunath subudhi, ca- ari-2 gopala, ba- nijigaon samili gandua chaura

118 130 979/1 Ganeswara subudhi, f- 0.012 0.012 Gharab Shop & 520 Already sold out 335 raghunath subudhi, ca- ari-2 house gopala, ba- nijigaon samili gandua chaura

xviii

xix

121 12 982 Arnapurna mahapatra, h- 0.018 0.018 Gharab House 780 Already sold out jagannath mahapatra, ca- ari-2 brahmana, ba- nijigaon 122 717 984 Subasini panda, h- 0.020 0.020 Gharab Refuse radhashyam panda, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon 123 373 985 Harihara guru, f- 0.008 0.008 Gharab House 350 Already sold out managobinda guru, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon 124 820 986 Gobinda chandra mahanty, 0.038 0.033 Gharab House 1430 Rabindra kumar Self M 78 OBC Yes f- jogendra nath mohanty, ari-2 mohanty ca- karana, ba- nijigaon Rajlaxmi Self F 62 OBC Yes mohanty Rajendra Self M 55 OBC Yes mohanty Deepak Son M 37 OBC Yes mohanty Sachinandan Son M 39 OBC Yes mohanty Anupam Son M 25 OBC Yes mohanty Mitali mohanty Daughter F 26 OBC Yes Viswabandan Son M 32 OBC Yes mohanty Pritimadhu Daughter F 30 OBC Yes mohanty 125 163 988 Gaurahari dash, f- 0.005 0.004 Gharab House 170 Already sold out jagannath dash, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 126 914 989 Sukumari ray, h- 0.010 0.010 Gharab House 450 Prasanta Self M 52 General Yes gopalachandra ray, ca- ari-2 purohit kayasta, ba- nijigaon Khetramani Daughter F 25 General Yes purohit Sonli purahit Daughter F 22 General Yes 127 817 990 Gagandha padhi, f- 0.004 0.004 Gharab House 170 Already sold out bhagirathi padhi, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba-nijagaon 128 817 991 Gagandha padhi, f- 0.011 0.011 Gharab House 480 Already sold out bhagirathi padhi, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba-nijagaon 129 715 992 Gunanidhi pattnayak, f- 0.010 0.010 Gharab Refuse artabandhu pattnayak, ca- ari-2 karana, ba- nijagaon 130 715 993 Gunanidhi pattnayak, f- 0.050 0.050 Gharab Refuse artabandhu pattnayak, ca- ari-2 karana, ba- nijagaon 131 78 994 Manoranjan pattnayak, 0.014 0.014 Gharab Refuse mahesh kumar pattnayak, f- ari-2 gunanidhi pattnayak, ca- karana, ba- basuli sahi, tha- puri town, dist.- puri 132 321 995 Deepak kumar sahu, f- 0.016 0.016 Gharab House 690 Already sold out simanchala sahu, ca- ari-2 sundhi, ba- chhatrapur, dist. Ganjam, anusaya sahu, h- surendra nath sahu, ca- sundhi, ba- nijigaon 133 47 996 Uchhaba lenka, f- bhima 0.028 0.028 Gharab House 1220 Already sold out linka, nilamani lenka, h- ari-2 uchhaba lenka, gurubari lenka, h- bhima lenka, ca- khandayat, ba- nijigaon

xxi

137 638 1217 Lingaraj panda, f- biswanath 0.020 0.020 Gharab House 870 Already sold out panda, ca- brahman, ba- ari-2 nijigaon

138 554 1218 Harekrushna khuntia, f- 0.006 0.006 Gharab House 260 Already sold out ramaraman khuntia, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon

xxii

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 139 260 1219 Naba kishor kara, 0.005 0.005 Gharab Shop 220 Already sold out radhanath kara, ari-2 purnachandra kara, gobinda chandra kara, prafulla chandra kara, prahallad kara, f- rama dayalu kara, lachhamana kara, f- sridhara kara, nilakantha kara, f- banamali kara, batakrushna kara, f- brundabana kara, haramani kara, h- jogeswar kara, baidyanath kara, dwarikanath kara, prabhunath kara, f- jogeswar kara, ca- brahmana, ba- nijigaon 140 157 1220 Nrusingha kara, f- 0.022 0.022 Gharab House & 2855. Already sold out gadadhara kara, ca- ari-2 Shop 58 brahmana, ba- nijagaon 141 61 1221 Kamalakanta mishra, f- 0.023 0.023 Gharab House 1000 Already sold out shyam sundara mishra, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon 142 261 1222 Shree patitapabana deva, 0.006 0.006 Gharab Shop 260 Manorama kara Self M 54 General No shree nrusingha natha ari-2 Nilakantha kar Self M 77 General No deva, shree radhakrushna Biswanatha Self M 66 General No deba bije mani karnika sahi kara marphat: ba: nabakishor Laxmiprasad Self M 57 General No kara, radhanath kara, purna kara chandra kara, gobinda Baidiyanath Self M 65 General No chandra kara, praphulla kara chandra kara, padmalabha Bhimsen kara Son M 33 General No kara, f- ram dayal kara, Nursinganatha Son M 48 General No lachhaman kara, f- kara shreedhara kara, Dwarikanatha Brother M 62 General No

xxiii

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) batakrushna kara, f- kara brundabana, jogeswar kara, Rajlaxmi kara Sister in F 58 General No harihara kara, nilakantha law kara, f- banamali kara, ca- Debasis kara Son M 21 General No sevak brahman, ba- Nirupama kara Sister in F 53 General No harachandi sahi law Gopinatha kara Nephew M 34 General No Amarnatha kara Grand son M 23 General No Ramnatha kara Nephew M 31 General No Chintamani kara Nephew M 36 General No Somnatha kara Grand son M 21 General No Sambhunath Grand son M 19 General No kara Santosh kumar Son M 33 General No kara Sangita kara Sister in F 52 General No law Prafula chandra Brother in M 56 General No kara law Rajamani kara Mother F 82 General No Padmalabha Brother in M 54 General No kara law 143 190 1223 Jayaram singhari, f- 0.007 0.007 Gharab Shop 300 Jogendra Self M 47 General No balabhadra singhari, ari-2 (Rented) subudhi balabhadra kara, f- gadadhara kara, singhari jogeswar kara, f- banamali kara, singhari raghunath kara, f- radhamohan kara, kasinath kara, f- singhari shyama kara, ca- brahman, ba: balisahi no-1 144 654 1224 Sakuntala panda, h- gopal 0.015 0.015 Gharab Refuse chandra panda, ca- ari-2 brahman, ba- nijigaon xxiv

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) 145 612 1225 Lakhi panda, f- agadhu 0.008 0.008 Gharab House & 640.7 Already sold out panda, ca- brahmana, ba- ari-2 Shop 6 nijigaon 146 26 1226 Krushna chandra jena, naba 0.008 0.008 Gharab Shop & 965.9 Already sold out kishora jena, f- arta jena, ari-2 house 2 ca- gopala, ba- nijagaon 147 26 1227 Krushna chandra jena, naba 0.014 0.014 Gharab Shop & 2000 Already sold out kishora jena, f- arta jena, ari-2 house ca- gopala, ba- nijagaon 148 237 1228 Dinabandhu singhari, f- 0.071 0.071 Gharab House 3090 Already sold out gadadhara singhari, ca- ari-2 sevaka brahman, ba- manikarnikasahi 149 228 1229 Damodara singhari, f- 0.057 0.057 Gharab House 2480 Already sold out gadadhara singhari, ca- ari-2 sevak brahman, ba- manikarnika sahi 150 143 965 Shree mahateswari 0.076 0.076 Gharab House 3310 Already sold out thakurani bije nijagruha ari-1 marphat: ba: gopala chandra mahapatra, radha mohan mohapatra, ramachandra mahapatra, raghunath mahapatra, biswanath mohapatra, f- basudeva mohapatra, gobinda chandra mohapatra, baidyanath mohapatra, f- gopala chandra mohapatra, shyam sundar mohapatra, banamali mohapatra, f- batakrushna mohapatra, ca- brahman, ba- harachandi sahi

xxv

155 786 900/1 Jayalaxmi khuntia, h- 0.003 0.0035 Gharab House & 150 Already sold out /23 382 laxminarayan khunti, ca- 5 ari-1 lodge sevak brahman, ba- harachandi sahi 156 786 899/1 Jayalaxmi khuntia, h- 0.003 0.003 Gharab House & 130 Already sold out /23 383 laxminarayan khunti, ca- ari-2 lodge sevak brahman, ba- harachandi sahi 157 786 903/1 Jayalaxmi khuntia, h- 0.009 0.009 Gharab House & 390 Already sold out /23 384 laxminarayan khunti, ca- ari-2 lodge sevak brahman, ba- harachandi sahi 158 786 900/1 Sampadaka bhitara 0.010 0.0105 Gharab Shop 450 Already sold out

xxvi

Sl. Kha Plot Name of the person having Total Land Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation Se Age Social Loss of Loss of Displac No. ta no RoR affect to be of up person with head x categor other other ed no ed acquir affected Area of the y of the assets assets (yes/ land ed (in property of HHs family associa associat no) (in acres) (residen affect ted ed with acres) tial ed with affecte house, prope affecte d land lodge, rty d land (quantit shop, (sq. (specifi y) etc.) Ft) cation) /24 385 sebayata nijoga, shree 5 ari-2 jagannath mandir puri maa, ba: brundabana pujapanda, f- ramachandra pujapanda, ca- sevak, ba- dolamandapa sahi 159 786 899/1 Sampadaka bhitara 0.008 0.008 Gharab 350 Already sold out /24 386 sebayata nijoga, shree ari-2 jagannath mandir puri maa, ba: brundabana pujapanda, f- ramachandra pujapanda, ca- sevak, ba- dolamandapa sahi 160 786 903/1 Sampadaka bhitara 0.029 0.029 Gharab 1260 Already sold out /24 387 sebayata nijoga, shree ari-2 jagannath mandir puri maa, ba: brundabana pujapanda, f- ramachandra pujapanda, ca- sevak, ba- dolamandapa sahi 161 786 985/1 Prativa dash, h- 0.014 0.014 Gharab House 1544. Already sold out /1 363 rabinarayana das, ca- ari-2 86 brahman, ba- puri town 162 786 990/1 Ganapati padhi, f- 0.015 0.015 Gharab House 650 Already sold out /10 475 bhagirathi padhi, ca- ari-2 6 brahman, ba- nijagaon 163 786 988/1 Purna chandra mohanty, f- 0.004 0.004 Gharab House 419.8 Already sold out /15 523 natabara mohanty, ari-2 5 1 nisamani mohanty, h- natabara mohanty, ca- karana, ba- golapur, tha- brahmagiri

xxvii

165 786 889/1 Rajakishor pradhan, f- 0.009 0.0095 Gharab House 410 Already sold out /15 528 nilakantha pradhan, ca- 5 ari-2 5 chasa, ba- nijagaon samili beteragali

166 786 902/1 Batakrushna mudra, f- 0.008 0.008 Gharab House & 350 Already sold out /16 540 chintamani mudra, ca- ari-2 Lodge 8 sevak brahman, ba- markandeswar sahi 167 786 868/1 Birata kishor das, f- durga 0.084 0.084 Gharab House 3650 Already sold out /54 424 charan das, ca- karana, ba- ari-2 nijigaon

xxviii

2. Manikarnika Sahi Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) 1 792 660 Government 0.412 0.004 Rasta Road 2 792 661 Government 0.009 0.009 Gharabari House & 568.6 Jogendra subudhi Self M 47 OBC Yes shop Jagannath Self M 60 General Yes patihari Ashok subudhi Son M 21 General Yes Ramanarayan Son M 37 General Yes patihari Monali subudhi Daughter F 20 General Yes Satyanarayan Son M 34 General Yes patihari 3 792 662 Government 0.002 0.0015 Gharabari Shop 65.64 Purna chandra Self M 66 OBC No subudhi Lokanatha Son M 39 OBC No subudhi 4 792 676 Government 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Vacant 220 land 5 792 963 Government 0.323 0.085 Rasta House 3700 Jogendra subudhi Self M 48 OBC Yes Ashok subudhi Son M 21 OBC Yes Monali subudhi Daughter F 20 OBC Yes

6 792 1024 Government 0.065 0.031 Rasta Road 7 792 660/1 Government 0.143 0.0595 Rasta Road 099 8 338 934 Shree jagannath 0.220 0.185 Gharabari House mahaprabhu bije (panjab shreekhetra marphat, ba: matha) - mahanta balaram das guru refuse ramachandra das, ca- baishnav, ba- nijigaon 9 761 935 Shree jagannath 0.013 0.011 Sweeper mahaprabhu bije place shreekhetra marphat, ba: xxix

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) raghaba das matha endaoment trastiboard 10 761 940 Shree jagannath 0.005 0.002 Sweeper mahaprabhu bije place shreekhetra marphat, ba: raghaba das matha endaoment trastiboard 11 112 941 Shree jagannath 0.098 0.053 Gharabari House 1307. Laxminarayan Self M 76 General Yes mahaprabhu bije 79 mohapatra shreekhetra marphat, ba: Rabinarayan Self M 57 General Yes gopabandhu mahapatra mohapatra ganeswahr mahapatra, Gopinatha Self M 76 General Yes gopinath mahapatra, f- mohapatra bhagirathi mahapatra, ca- Surya narayan Son M 49 General Yes brahman, ba- nijigaon mohapatra Ramabalava Son M 44 General Yes mohapatra Bhagirathi Son M 28 General Yes mohapatra Aditi mohapatra Grand F 18 General Yes daughter Haribalava Son M 42 General Yes mohapatra 12 762 947/1 Shree jagannath 0.003 0.0005 Gharabari Shop 20 Jagannath Self M 70 General No 122 mahaprabhu bije pratihari shreekhetra marphat raghaba das matha, endaoment trastiboard, ba- 13 762 960 Shree jagannath 0.005 0.005 Rasta Road mahaprabhu bije shreekhetra marphat raghaba das matha, endaoment trastiboard, ba-

xxx

15 698 1031 Shree jagannath 0.010 0.004 Gharabari House 180 Makardwaja Self M 65 OBC Yes mahaprabhu bije pradhan shreekhetra marphat, Ramakanta Son M 38 OBC Yes dakhinaparswa matha pradhan endaoment trastiboard, ba- Radhakant Soon M 35 OBC Yes pradhan Sashikanta Son M 27 OBC Yes pradhan 16 700 1041/ Shree jagannath 0.065 0.059 Gharabari House & 2570 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Coconu 9 Yes 1101 mahaprabhu bije shop t tree shreekhetra marphat, Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes dakhinaparswa matha duby endaoment trastiboard, ba- Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumari duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes

17 701 1032 Shree jagannath 0.024 0.016 Gharabari House & 1988. Satyabhama Self F 74 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Shop 54 mohapatra shreekhetra marphat, Lokanatha Self M 33 General Yes xxxi

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) dakhinaparswa matha mohapatra endaoment trastiboard, ba- Siba mohapatra Self M 75 OBC Yes Surendra Self M 70 OBC Yes mohapatra Manorama Self F 50 OBC Yes mohapatra Somanatha Adopted M 25 OBC Yes mohapatra son Amit mohapatra Son M 36 OBC Yes Pradeep Son M 45 OBC Yes mohapatra Basanta Son M 38 OBC Yes mohapatra Jayashree Daughter F 24 OBC Yes mohapatra Asit mohapatra Son M 34 OBC Yes Pratap mohapatra Son M 38 OBC Yes Prakash Son M 37 OBC Yes mohapatra 18 698 1033 Shree jagannath 0.008 0.004 Gharabari Shop 141.6 A. ganesh acharya Self M 45 General Yes mahaprabhu bije 2 shreekhetra marphat, dakhinaparswa matha endaoment trastiboard, ba- 19 698 1036 Shree jagannath 0.005 0.001 Gharabari Matha 40 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat, duby dakhinaparswa matha Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes endaoment trastiboard, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes xxxii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) 20 698 1138/ Shree jagannath 0.006 0.006 Gharabari House & 260 Sanjay kumar Self M 52 OBC Yes 1103 mahaprabhu bije shop swain shreekhetra marphat, Bhagirathi swain Son M 25 OBC Yes dakhinaparswa matha Madhusudan Son M 22 OBC Yes endaoment trastiboard, ba- swain 21 698 1039 Shree jagannath 0.040 0.040 Gharabari Matha 1740 Sankutal Self F 60 OBC Yes mahaprabhu bije (Dakhin samathara shreekhetra marphat, aparas Samuja gopal Son M 33 OBC Yes dakhinaparswa matha Matha) samantara endaoment trastiboard, ba- Sibani kumari Daughter F 25 OBC Yes samantara 22 698 1042 Shree jagannath 0.022 0.022 Gharabari 960 Santilata behera Self F 75 OBC Yes mahaprabhu bije Maguni behera Son M 49 OBC Yes shreekhetra marphat, Rashmi ranjan Grand son M 21 OBC Yes dakhinaparswa matha behera endaoment trastiboard, ba- Babuli Behera Son M 36 OBC Yes Raghunath Son M 44 OBC Yes behera Bibhuti bhushan Son M 43 OBC Yes behera 23 665 1046 Shree jagannath 0.045 0.045 Gharabari House 1960 Kalpana pande Self F 50 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Jagannath Son M 21 General Yes shreekhetra marphat, ramanuj Das ramanuja das guru dullav ramanuja das, ca- baishnav, ba- nijagaon 24 338 942 Shree jagannath 0.491 0.387 Gharabari House 21842 mahaprabhu bije (panjab .56 shreekhetra marphat, ba: matha) - mahanta balaram das, guru refuse ramachandra das, ca- baishnav, ba- nijagaon

xxxiii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) 25 737 663 Shree jagannath 0.021 0.021 Gharabari Shop 920 Shree mandir No mahaprabhu bije (Five parichalana shreekhetra marphat mandir number committee parichalana kamiti shree ) mandir puri, ba- 26 760 667 Shree jagannath 0.017 0.017 Gharabari House 740 Gyanedra narayan Self M 77 General Yes mahaprabhu bije brahmachari shreekhetra marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree Jogendra narayan Son M 44 General Yes mandir puri, ba- brahmachari Rajendra narayan Son M 41 General Yes brahmachari Debendra Son M 39 General Yes narayan brahmachari Soumendra Son M 37 General Yes narayan brahmachari Dharmendra Son M 35 General Yes narayan brahmachari 27 760 668 Shree jagannath 0.020 0.020 Gharabari House 870 Gyanedra narayan Self M 77 General Yes mahaprabhu bije brahmachari shreekhetra marphat mandir Jogendra narayan Son M 44 General Yes parichalana kamiti shree brahmachari mandir puri, ba- Rajendra narayan Son M 41 General Yes brahmachari Debendra Son M 39 General Yes narayan brahmachari Soumendra Son M 37 General Yes narayan brahmachari

xxxiv

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) Dharmendra Son M 35 General Yes narayan brahmachari 28 760 669 Shree jagannath 0.064 0.064 Gharabari House 2780 Gyanedra narayan Self M 77 General Yes mahaprabhu bije brahmachari shreekhetra marphat mandir Jogendra narayan Son M 44 General Yes parichalana kamiti shree brahmachari mandir puri, ba- Rajendra narayan Son M 41 General Yes brahmachari Debendra Son M 39 General Yes narayan brahmachari Soumendra Son M 37 General Yes narayan brahmachari Dharmendra Son M 35 General Yes narayan brahmachari 29 699 943 Shree jagannath 0.076 0.040 Gharabari Vacant 1740 No mahaprabhu bije land shreekhetra marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandir puri, ba- 30 699 944 Shree jagannath 0.023 0.012 Gharabari House 520 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes

xxxv

32 699 946 Shree jagannath 0.006 0.003 Gharabari House 130 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes

33 699 947 Shree jagannath 0.012 0.007 Gharabari House 300 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 34 699 949 Shree jagannath 0.054 0.054 Gharabari House 2350 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes

xxxvi

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 35 699 950 Shree jagannath 0.107 0.107 Gharabari House 4660 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 36 743 953 Shree jagannath 0.010 0.010 Gharabari Sweepe 435 No mahaprabhu bije r place shreekhetra marphat mandir (vacant parichalana kamiti shree land) mandir puri, ba- 37 743 954 Shree jagannath 0.071 0.071 Gharabari 3090 Surendranath Self M 75 General Yes mahaprabhu bije sabat shreekhetra marphat mandir Pramda sabat Self M 62 General Yes parichalana kamiti shree Monaranjan sabat Son M 42 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Amaya ranjan Son M 45 General Yes sabat Kanhi sabat Daughter M 34 General Yes 38 699 1025 Shree jagannath 0.015 0.008 Gharabari House & 350 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes xxxvii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 39 699 1026 Shree jagannath 0.009 0.005 Gharabari House & 220 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 40 699 1027 Shree jagannath 0.008 0.004 Gharabari House & 180 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 41 699 1028 Shree jagannath 0.007 0.004 Gharabari House & 180 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 42 699 1029 Shree jagannath 0.009 0.005 Gharabari House & 220 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes xxxviii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 43 659/ 1041 Shree jagannath 1.110 0.851 Gharabari House & 4500 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes 43 mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 44 659/ 1045 Shree jagannath 0.023 0.023 Gharabari House 523.1 Narayan nayak Self M 63 OBC Yes 43 mahaprabhu bije 3 Harihar nayak Self M 60 OBC Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir Arjun nayak Self M 56 OBC Yes parichalana kamiti shree Rakesh nayak Son M 33 OBC Yes mandir puri, ba- Laxmidhar nayak Son M 27 OBC Yes Somanath nayak Son M 30 OBC Yes Ranjan nayak Son M 26 OBC Yes Hatakrishna Son M 27 OBC Yes nayak Abhinash nayak Son M 25 OBC Yes 45 699 1030 Shree jagannath 0.739 0.532 Gharabari House & 3000 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law xxxix

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 46 659/ 1047 Shree jagannath 0.186 0.035 Gharabari House & 1520 Shymsundar duby Self M 90 General Yes 52 mahaprabhu bije shop Rajesh kumar Son M 44 General Yes shreekhetra marphat mandir duby parichalana kamiti shree Suresh duby Grand son M 21 General Yes mandir puri, ba- Neta duby Niece F 40 General Yes Raj kumaro duby Daughter- F 55 General Yes in-law Awadesh duby Nephew M 45 General Yes Lakhalala duby Nephew M 40 General Yes 47 770 664 Shree kapalamochan deba, 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Shop 171 Krushna Chandra Self M General No bije nijagaon, marphat Behera balaram panda, harekrushna panda, f- brahman, ba- nijagaon 48 770 665 Shree kapalamohan deba, 0.009 0.009 Gharabari Shop 390 Krushna Chandra Self M General No bije nijagaon, marphat Behera balaram panda, harekrushna panda, f- brahman, ba- nijagaon 49 65 666 Nilakantha behera, f- laxman 0.008 0.008 Gharabari Shop 350 behera, ca- gopala, ba- (refuse) harachandi sahi, samili naga matha lane 50 711 670 Shree gelebai thakurani bije 0.115 0.056 Gharabari Temple 2400 Coconu 1 No nijagaon, marphat samasta (Gelabai t tree gramabasi pakhya, ba- thakura narasingha mahanty, f- ni) shyam sundar mahanty, jayaram kara, f- balabhadra kara, raghunath mahapatra, f- managobinda mahapatra,

xli

xlii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) 56 76 936 Krushnachandra dikhit, f- 0.007 0.003 Gharabari Shop 130 Already sold out Ramachandra dikhit, Saraswati dikhit, H- Krushna chandra dikhit, ca- Brahmana, Ba- Harachandi Sahi 57 75 937 Krushna chandra sahoo, 0.023 0.015 Gharabari House 650 Already sold out nabaghana sahoo, shiba sahoo, rabinarayana sahoo, gobinda chandra sahoo, gopala charan sahoo, f- raghunath sahoo, hiramani sahoo, h- raghunath sahoo, ca- gudia, ba- nijagaon 58 311 938 Baidyaratna kabiraj, purna 0.120 0.093 Gharabari House 4000 Already sold out chandra ratha, f- ramakrushna bidyaratna ratha, ca- brahman, ba- nijagaon 59 311 939 Baidyaratna kabiraj, purna 0.009 0.006 Gharabari Homest 260 Already sold out chandra ratha, f- ed land ramakrushna bidyaratna ratha, ca- brahman, ba- nijagaon 60 482 948 Ramamani guru, f- surya 0.020 0.012 Gharabari Lodge 520 Already sold out narayan guru, ca- brahman, and ba- nijagaon shop 61 299 951 Pramod kumar das 0.010 0.010 Gharabari House & 430 Already sold out chaudhuri, f- laxman shop chaudhuri, ca- kayastha, ba- nijagaon

xliii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) 299 952 Pramod kumar das 0.014 0.014 Gharabari House & 600 Already sold out chaudhuri, f- laxman shop chaudhuri, ca- kayastha, ba- nijagaon 62 659/ 955 Kaliyuga narayana pratihari, 0.018 0.018 Gharabari House 1196. Already sold out 15 f- kaliyuga bamadeba 84 pratihari, kaliyuga madhusudan pratihari, f- kaliyuga genesh pratihari, ca- sevak brahmana, ba- nijagaon, barahi sahi 63 578 956 Sadasiba sahoo, f- ganesh 0.015 0.015 Gharabari House 650 Already sold out sahoo, ca- bania, ba- nijagaon 64 630 957 Kaliyuga narayana pratihari, 0.014 0.014 Gharabari House 600 Already sold out f- kaliyuga bamadeba pratihari, kaliyuga madhusudan pratihari, f- kaliyuga genesh pratihari, kaliyuga artatrana pratihari, kaliyuga janardana pratihari, f- kaliyuga damodara pratihari, ca- sevak brahmana, ba- nijagaon, barahi sahi 65 606 958 Sanjukta samal, h- ramesh 0.007 0.007 Gharabari House 200 Already sold out chandra samal, ca- khandayat, ba- balisahi barahi lane, tha- puri town 66 34 959 Haramani maharana, f- 0.002 0.0005 Gharabari House 20 Already sold out bhima maharana, ca- badhei, (On ba- nijagaon border Line)

xliv

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having Total Land to Kisam Nature Built Project affected Relation S Age Social Loss of Loss Displ No a no no ror affecte be of up person with head e category other of aced . d land acquire affected Area of the hhs x of the assets other (yes/ (in d (in propert of family associa assets no) acres) acres) y affect ted associ (residen ed with ated tial prope affecte with house, rty d land affect lodge, (sq. (specifi ed shop, Ft) cation) land etc.) (quan tity) 67 281 961 Jayanarayana mahapatra, 0.208 0.123 Gharabari House & 13982 Already sold out basudev mahapatra, f- Lodge .36 damodar mahapatra, ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon 68 552 1041/ Laxmipriya saraf, h- gobinda 0.015 0.009 Gharabari House & 1176. Already sold out 1152 prasad saraf, ca- brahman, Shop 12 ba- nijigaon 69 659/ 1034 Jugal charan nayak, f- 0.015 0.011 Gharabari House 470 Already sold out 69 uchhaba nayak, ca- (Under khandayat, ba: plot. No. Constru 739/8 bhimapur, tha- ction airfield, dist. Khordha house) 70 96 1035 Ganesh prasad saraf, f- 0.020 0.016 Gharabari House & 690 Already sold out biswanath saraf, ca- bania, shop ba- nijagaon 71 96 1035/ Ganesh prasad saraf, f- 0.005 0.001 Gharabari House & 40 Already sold out 1102 biswanath saraf, ca- bania, shop ba- nijagaon 72 659/ 1037 Krushna prasad sarma, f- 0.007 0.002 Gharabari House & 80 Already sold out 37 rameswar sharma, ca- shop brahman, ba- nijagaon 73 659/ 1038/ Krushna prasad sarma, f- 0.005 0.005 Gharabari House & 220 Already sold out 37 1157 rameswar sharma, ca- shop brahman, ba- nijagaon 74 167 1040 Harihara behera, f- 0.022 0.022 Gharabari House & 950 Already sold out jagannath behera, ca- gopal, shop ba- goudabadi sahi 75 135 1043 Gouramani devi, h- gobinda 0.022 0.022 Gharabari House & 950 Already sold out chandra das mahapatra, ba- shop kalikadebi sahi 76 300 1044 Prahallad nayak, f- gobinda 0.018 0.018 Gharabari House & 2103. Already sold out nayak ca- gola, ba- nijagaon Shop 33

xlv

xlvi

3. Kalikadevi Sahi Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person Total Land to Kisam Nature of Built Project affected Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss of Dis No. a no no having ror affect be affected up person with head x e categor other other pla ed acquire property Area of of the y of the assets assets ce land d (in (residenti affecte HHs family associ associa d (in acres) al house, d ated ted (ye acres) lodge, proper with with s/ shop, ty (sq. affecte affecte no etc.) Ft) d land d land ) (specif (quanti ication ty) ) 1 426 1 Government 0.42 0.42 Rasta Road 2 426 2 Government 0.035 0.027 Chautara Chautara 3 426 3 Government 0.028 0.022 Gharabari Vacant place 4 426 21 Government 0.002 0.002 Rasta Road 5 426 24 Government 0.005 0.005 Rasta Road 6 426 32 Government 0.037 0.023 Rasta Road 7 426 66 Government 0.06 0.018 Rasta Road 8 426 110 Government 0.03 0.003 Rasta Road 9 254 67 Shree jagannath 0.040 0.027 Gharabari House & 871.38 Mahanta Self M 62 General Ye mahaprabhu bije shop raghubir das s shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramachandra das guru narayana das, ca- baistamba, ba- nijigaon balaramkot, jabar dakhal, ba- tripura sundari paichha, h- trinath paichha, ca- khyatriya, ba- nijigaon 10 327 68 Shree jagannath 0.002 0.0005 Rasta Beyond mahaprabhu bije 75m shreekhetra marphat, Zone, ba: mahanta shreenibas (NA), ramanuja das guru House mahanta gadadhara (EMAR ramanuja das, ca- Matha) baishnab, ba- nijigaon emara matha 11 327 19 Shree jagannath 2.113 1.458 Gharabari Shop 2623.0 Raj gopal Self M 52 General No mahaprabhu bije (EMAR 6 ramanuj dash shreekhetra marphat, Matha) xlvii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person Total Land to Kisam Nature of Built Project affected Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss of Dis No. a no no having ror affect be affected up person with head x e categor other other pla ed acquire property Area of of the y of the assets assets ce land d (in (residenti affecte HHs family associ associa d (in acres) al house, d ated ted (ye acres) lodge, proper with with s/ shop, ty (sq. affecte affecte no etc.) Ft) d land d land ) (specif (quanti ication ty) ) ba: mahanta shreenibas ramanuja das guru mahanta gadadhara ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijigaon emara matha 12 415 20 Shree jagannath 0.002 0.002 Gharabari House 80 Raj gopal Self M 52 General Ye mahaprabhu bije (EMAR ramanuj dash s shreekhetra marphat, Matha) ba: mahanta shreenibas ramanuja das guru mahanta gadadhara ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijigaon emara matha 13 327 22 Shree jagannath 0.001 0.001 Gharabari House 50 Raj gopal Self M 52 General Ye mahaprabhu bije (EMAR ramanuj dash s shreekhetra marphat, Matha) ba: mahanta shreenibas ramanuja das guru mahanta gadadhara ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijigaon emara matha 14 327 23 Shree jagannath 0.037 0.037 Rasta House 1600 Raj gopal Self M 52 General Ye mahaprabhu bije (EMAR ramanuj dash s shreekhetra marphat, Matha) ba: mahanta shreenibas ramanuja das guru mahanta gadadhara ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijigaon emara matha 15 327 69/6 Shree jagannath Gharabari Beyond 74 mahaprabhu bije xlviii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person Total Land to Kisam Nature of Built Project affected Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss of Dis No. a no no having ror affect be affected up person with head x e categor other other pla ed acquire property Area of of the y of the assets assets ce land d (in (residenti affecte HHs family associ associa d (in acres) al house, d ated ted (ye acres) lodge, proper with with s/ shop, ty (sq. affecte affecte no etc.) Ft) d land d land ) (specif (quanti ication ty) ) shreekhetra marphat, 75m SIA ba: mahanta shreenibas Zone (NA) ramanuja das guru mahanta gadadhara ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijigaon emara matha 16 364 25 Shree jagannath 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Shop 130 Bhabani Self M 32 General No mahaprabhu bije (Mangu shankara dash shreekhetra marphat Matha) bije puri marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- 17 361/ 26 Shree jagannath 0.004 0.004 Gharabari Shop 170 Bhabani Self M 32 General No 43 mahaprabhu bije (Mangu shankara dash shreekhetra marphat Matha) bije puri marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- 18 364 27 Shree jagannath 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Shop 130 Bhabani Self M 32 General No mahaprabhu bije (Mangu shankara dash shreekhetra marphat Matha) bije puri marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- 19 361/ 28 Shree jagannath 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Shop 130 Bhabani Self M 32 General No 43 mahaprabhu bije (Mangu shankara dash shreekhetra marphat Matha) bije puri marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- xlix

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person Total Land to Kisam Nature of Built Project affected Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss of Dis No. a no no having ror affect be affected up person with head x e categor other other pla ed acquire property Area of of the y of the assets assets ce land d (in (residenti affecte HHs family associ associa d (in acres) al house, d ated ted (ye acres) lodge, proper with with s/ shop, ty (sq. affecte affecte no etc.) Ft) d land d land ) (specif (quanti ication ty) ) 20 364 29 Shree jagannath 0.007 0.007 Gharabari Shop 300 Bhabani Self M 32 General No mahaprabhu bije (Mangu shankara dash shreekhetra marphat Matha) bije puri marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- 21 364 30 Shree jagannath 0.008 0.008 Gharabari Shop 350 Bhabani Self M 32 General No mahaprabhu bije (Mangu shankara dash shreekhetra marphat Matha) bije puri marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- 22 361/ 31 Shree jagannath 0.095 0.095 Gharabari Shop 2000 Bhabani Self M 32 General No 43 mahaprabhu bije (Mangu shankara dash shreekhetra marphat Matha) bije puri marphat mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- 23 363 33 Shree jagannath 0.11 0.058 Gharabari House 2500 Damadhara Self M 64 OBC Ye mahaprabhu bije (Mangu pradhani s shreekhetra marphat Matha) Swayamjeet Son M 35 OBC Ye bije puri marphat pradhani s mandir parichalana Saomjit pradhani Son M 32 OBC Ye kamiti shree mandira s puri, ba- 24 406 34 Shree jagannath 0.095 0.007 Gharabari Vacant 300 No mahaprabhu bije place shreekhetra marphat (EMAR bije puri marphat Matha) mandir parichalana kamiti shree mandira puri, ba- l

4. Dolamandap Sahi Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having ror Total Land Kisam Nature Are Project affected Relati Se Age Social Loss of Loss Dis No. a no no affect to be of a of person on x category other of plac ed acquir affected affe with of the assets other ed land ed (in property cted head family associ assets (yes (in acres) (residen pro of ated associ /no acres) tial pert the with ated ) house, y hhs affecte with lodge, (sq. d land affect shop, Ft) (specif ed etc.) ication land ) (quan tity) 1 662 201 Government 0.074 0.074 Nayanajori Vacant land 2 536 220 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.006 0.001 Gharabari Shop 40 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 3 536 221 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.006 0.002 Gharabari Shop 80 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca-brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 4 536 222 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.005 0.003 Gharabari Shop 130 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 5 536 223 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.003 0.002 Gharabari Shop 80 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 5 536 224 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Shop 130 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha

lii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the person having ror Total Land Kisam Nature Are Project affected Relati Se Age Social Loss of Loss Dis No. a no no affect to be of a of person on x category other of plac ed acquir affected affe with of the assets other ed land ed (in property cted head family associ assets (yes (in acres) (residen pro of ated associ /no acres) tial pert the with ated ) house, y hhs affecte with lodge, (sq. d land affect shop, Ft) (specif ed etc.) ication land ) (quan tity) 6 536 225 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Shop 200 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 7 536 226 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Shop 200 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 8 536 227 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Shop 200 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 9 536 231 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.006 0.006 Gharabari Shop 260 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes bije shreekhetra marphat, ba: ramakrusna das mahanta krushna charan das, guru mahanta radha charan das, ca- brahmana baisthamba, ba- nijigaon, radha ballav matha 10 519/ 228 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.006 0.006 Gharabari Matha 260 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes 34 bije shreekhetra marphat ramakrusna das mandira parichalana kamiti shree mandira, puri, ba- 11 519/ 229 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.011 0.011 Gharabari Matha 470 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes 34 bije shreekhetra marphat ramakrusna das mandira parichalana kamiti shree mandira, puri, ba- 12 519/ 232 Shree jagannath mahaprabhu 0.006 0.005 Gharabari Matha 200 Mahanta Self M 49 General Yes 34 bije shreekhetra marphat ramakrusna das liii

liv

5. Chudanga Sahi Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) 1 373 116 Government 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Vacant land 2 373 117 Government 0.084 0.084 Jalasaya Jalasaya 3 373 118 Government 0.015 0.015 Nayanajori Nayanaj ori 4 373 119 Government 0.148 0.148 Hidi gohiri Hadi gohiri 5 373 120 Government 0.018 0.018 Rasta Rasta 6 373 122/6 Government 0.004 0.004 Gharabari Vacant 12 land 7 373 122/5 Government 0.007 0.007 Gharabari Vacant 65 land 8 373 138 Government 0.010 0.010 Rasta Rasta 9 373 139 Government 0.138 0.138 Rasta Rasta 10 373 172 Government 0.007 0.007 Jalasaya Jalasaya 11 373 173 Government 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Vacant land 12 373 277 Government 0.015 0.015 Gharabari Vacant land 13 373 278 Government 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Vacant land 14 373 282 Government 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Vacant land 15 373 507 Government 0.128 0.128 Rasta Rasta 16 373 508 Government 0.044 0.044 Nayanajori Nayanaj ori 17 373 528 Government 0.008 0.008 Gharabari Vacant land 18 373 529 Government 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Vacant land

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) 19 373 530 Government 0.005 0.005 Gharabari Vacant land 20 373 531 Government 0.032 0.032 Gharabari Vacant land 21 373 833 Government 0.002 0.002 Gharabari Vacant land 22 373 535 Government 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Vacant land 23 373 536 Government 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Vacant land 24 373 537 Government 0.006 0.006 Gharabari Vacant land 25 373 538 Government 0.008 0.008 Gharabari Vacant land 26 373 539 Government 0.004 0.004 Gharabari Vacant land 27 373 540 Government 0.003 0.003 Gharabari Vacant land 28 373 540/6 Government 0.002 0.002 Gharabari Vacant 15 land 29 373 540/6 Government 0.001 0.001 Gharabari Vacant 16 land 30 373 542 Government 0.004 0.004 Gharabari Vacant land 31 373 543 Government 0.006 0.006 Gharabari Vacant land 32 373 544 Government 0.006 0.006 Gharabari Vacant land 33 373 546 Government 0.006 0.006 Gharabari Vacant land 34 373 548 Government 0.006 0.006 Gharabari Vacant land 35 373 551 Government 1.508 0.255 Rasta Rasta lvi

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) 36 373 684 Government 0.193 0.193 Rasta Rasta 37 373 685 Government 0.090 0.090 Rasta Rasta 38 326 125 Shree jagannath 0.486 0.110 Gharabari House 2500 Raghabendra Self M 58 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (rebesha prapanna shreekhetra matha) ramanuj das marphat - ba: Ghana nayak Self M 59 OBC Yes raghabendra praparna ramanuja das, guru ramabilash ramanuja das, ca- baistamba, ba- nijagaon rebasa matha 39 326 128 Shree jagannath 0.250 0.170 Gharabari House 2000 Raghabendra Self M 58 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (rebesha prapanna shreekhetra matha) ramanuj das marphat - ba: Ghana nayak Self M 59 OBC Yes raghabendra praparna ramanuja das, guru ramabilash ramanuja das, ca- baistamba, ba- nijagaon rebasa matha 40 326 129 Shree jagannath 0.016 0.015 Gharabari House 650 Bijaylaxmi Self F 58 OBC Yes mahaprabhu bije agarwal shreekhetra Rakesh kumar Son M 34 OBC Yes marphat - ba: Agarwal raghabendra Bikash agarwal Son M 32 OBC Yes praparna ramanuja das, guru ramabilash lvii

42 303 268 Shree jagannath 0.403 0.060 Gharabari House 2600 Bishun mohan Self M 85 General Yes mahaprabhu bije Gharabari House mallick shreekhetra, Gharabari House Gobind Self M 80 General Yes marphat chandra mallick uttarparshya matha Radha mohan Self M 70 OBC Yes endament trusty mallik board, ba- Akshay kumar Son M 55 OBC Yes mallick Sushanta Son M 40 OBC Yes kumar mallick Jayadev mallik Grand M 25 OBC Yes son 43 303 270 Shree jagannath 0.378 0.316 Gharabari Shop 6000 Sailabala prusty Self F 43 OBC No 44 303 270 mahaprabhu bije Gharabari Shop Tikina prusty Self M 58 OBC No 45 303 270 shreekhetra, Gharabari Shop Gita panda Self M 51 OBC No 46 303 270 marphat Gharabari Shop Surendra Self M 48 OBC No uttarparshwa pradhan 47 303 270 matha endament Gharabari Shop Ramachandra Self M 81 OBC No trusty board, ba- pradhan 48 303 270 Gharabari Shop Pradipta Self F 52 General No pradhan

lviii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) 49 303 270 Gharabari Shop Surendra Self M 45 General No kumar prusty 50 303 270 Gharabari Shop Aparna patra Self M 47 OBC No 51 303 270 Gharabari Shop Rabindra sahoo Self M 42 OBC No 52 303 270 Gharabari Shop Rabi narayan Self M 35 OBC No pratihari 53 303 270 Gharabari Shop Parbati sahoo Self M 64 General No 54 303 270 Gharabari Shop Narayan prusty Self F 52 OBC No 55 303 270 Gharabari Shop Arjuna prusty Self M 46 OBC No 56 303 270 Gharabari Shop Harihara prusty Self M 60 OBC No 57 303 270 Gharabari Shop Basanti kumar Self F 55 OBC No parichha 58 303 270 Gharabari Shop Arnnapurna Self M 55 OBC No sahoo 59 303 270 Gharabari Shop Harish chandra Self F 64 OBC No sahoo 60 303 270 Gharabari Shop Bhagaban Self M 52 OBC No sahoo 61 303 270 Gharabari Shop Akrura sahoo Son M 41 General No 62 303 270 Gharabari Shop Laxmipriya Self F 55 OBC No behera 63 303 270 Gharabari Shop Mamata dash Self M 37 OBC No 64 303 270 Gharabari Shop Shyamasundar Self M 48 OBC No sahoo 65 303 270 Gharabari Shop Saraswati Self M 41 General No parichha 66 303 270 Gharabari Shop Santosh kumar Self F 73 General No sahoo 67 303 270 Gharabari Shop Jaya chandra Self M 52 OBC No dash 68 303 270 Gharabari Shop Satya narayan Self M 40 OBC No mangaraj 69 303 270 Gharabari Shop Durga charan Self M 52 General No lix

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) sharma 70 303 270 Gharabari Shop Krushna ch. Self M 39 General No Sahoo 71 303 270 Gharabari Homeste Chandra sekhar Husband M 57 General No d land sahoo 72 303 270 Gharabari Shop Rajibalochan Self M 65 General No sahoo 73 303 270 Gharabari Shop Purna chandra Self M 46 OBC No sahoo 74 303 270 Gharabari Shop Subash chandra Self F 74 General No panigrahi 75 303 270 Gharabari Shop Sankarsan Self M 47 General No swain 76 303 270 Gharabari Shop Gopal sahoo Self M 61 OBC No 77 303 270 Gharabari Shop Bhimsen sahoo Self M 55 General No 78 303 270 Gharabari Shop Minati sahoo Self M 47 OBC No 79 303 270 Gharabari Shop Banamali sahoo Self M 36 OBC No 80 303 270 Gharabari Shop Bishnupriya Self F 72 OBC No senapati 81 303 270 Gharabari Homeste Gopinath Self M 75 General No d land sahoo 82 303 270 Gharabari Shop Sundari das Self M 65 OBC No 83 303 270 Gharabari Shop Baban patra Self F 64 General No 84 303 270 Gharabari Shop Prasanta kumar Self M 75 General No sahoo 85 303 270 Gharabari Shop Braja kishor Self M 60 OBC No behera 86 303 270 Gharabari Shop Anupama Self M 70 OBC No senapati 87 303 270 Gharabari Shop Hata kishor Self M 35 OBC No behera 88 303 270 Gharabari Shop Sankarsan Self M 80 OBC No nayak lx

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) 89 303 270 Gharabari Shop Sashi bharati Self F 54 OBC No 90 303 270 Gharabari Shop Manas ku. Self M 47 OBC No Ghaturai 91 303 270 Gharabari House Makhita Self M 41 General Yes behera 92 303 270 Gharabari Shop Bela rani mallik Self M 45 OBC No 93 303 270 Gharabari Shop Dasarathi Self M 48 OBC No sahoo 94 303 270 Gharabari Shop Manoranjan pal Self F 48 General No 95 303 270 Gharabari Shop Chitaranjan pal Self F 39 General No 96 303 270 Gharabari Shop Suchita Self M 40 General No satapathy 97 303 270 Gharabari Shop Umesh chandra Self M 40 General No mohapatra 98 303 270 Gharabari Shop S. Adiamma Self M 46 General No reddy 99 303 270 Gharabari Shop Barendra Self F 58 General No kumar sahoo 100 303 270 Gharabari Homeste Sanjib kumar Self M 84 OBC No d land rout 101 303 270 Gharabari Shop Anjan kumar Self M 58 General No mallick 102 303 270 Gharabari Shop Laxmi priya Self M 40 General No sahu 103 254 271 Shree jagannath 0.213 0.177 Gharabari House 3000 Srichandan Self M 37 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (trimali dash shreekhetra, matha) marphat, ba: mahanta sankarshana ramanuja das, guru shreehari ramanuja das, ca- baistamba,

lxi

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) ba- nijagaon, trimali matha 104 232 275 Shree jagannath 0.017 0.005 Gharabari House 220 Koushal kishore Self M 65 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (torani das shreekhetra, chatra marphat, ba: matha) mahanta ramacharan das, guru mahanta jamuna das, ca- baistamba, ba- nijagaon, torania matha 105 303 276 Shree jagannath 0.210 0.090 Gharabari Shop 3900 Mahanta sri Self M 52 OBC No mahaprabhu bije narayan shreekhetra, ramanuja das marphat uttarparshwa matha endament trusty board, ba- 106 303 283 Shree jagannath 0.081 0.074 Gharabari House 3220 Mahanta sri Self M 52 OBC Yes mahaprabhu bije narayan shreekhetra, ramanuja das marphat uttarparshwa matha endament trusty board, ba- 107 303 284 Shree jagannath 0.050 0.035 Gharabari Shop & 1500 Krushna Self M 65 General Yes mahaprabhu bije house chandra sahoo shreekhetra, marphat uttarparshwa matha endament trusty board, ba- lxii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) 108 303 285 Shree jagannath 0.010 0.007 Gharabari House 300 Mahanta sri Self M 52 OBC Yes mahaprabhu bije narayan shreekhetra, ramanuja das marphat uttarparshwa matha endament trusty board, ba- 109 236 523 Shree jagannath 0.004 0.002 Gharabari House & 80 Mahanta sri Self M 52 General Yes mahaprabhu bije temple harinarayan shreekhetra, (bada dash marphat ba: akhada mahanta matha) ramaprakasa das ji, guru balaka das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijagaon, bada akhada matha 110 236 524 Shree jagannath 0.003 0.003 Gharabari House & 130 Mahanta sri Self M 52 General Yes mahaprabhu bije temple harinarayan shreekhetra, (bada dash marphat ba: akhada mahanta matha) ramaprakasa das ji, guru balaka das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijagaon, bada akhada matha 111 236 525 Shree jagannath 0.002 0.002 Gharabari House & 90 Mahanta sri Self M 52 General Yes mahaprabhu bije temple harinarayan shreekhetra, (bada dash marphat ba: akhada mahanta matha) ramaprakasa das ji, guru balaka das, ca- lxiii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) baishnab, ba- nijagaon, bada akhada matha 112 236 526 Shree jagannath 0.428 0.375 Gharabari House & Mahanta sri Self M 52 General Yes mahaprabhu bije temple harinarayan shreekhetra, (bada dash marphat ba: akhada mahanta matha) ramaprakasa das ji, guru balaka das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijagaon, bada akhada matha 113 236 527 Shree jagannath 0.042 0.026 Gharabari House & 1100 Mahanta sri Self M 52 General Yes mahaprabhu bije temple harinarayan shreekhetra, (bada dash marphat ba: akhada mahanta matha) ramaprakasa das ji, guru balaka das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijagaon, bada akhada matha 114 303 266 Shree jagannath 0.038 0.038 Debastali House 1600 Sri narayan Self M 55 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (uttarpar ramanuja dash shreekhetra, swa marphat matha) uttarparshya matha endament trusty board, ba- 115 303 267 Shree jagannath 1.200 0.920 Gharabari House Sri narayan Self M 55 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (uttarpar ramanuja dash shreekhetra, swa marphat matha) lxiv

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) uttarparshya matha endament trusty board, ba- 116 319 114 Shree jagannath 0.083 0.083 Gharabari House 3600 Bijaya narayan Self M 60 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (kataki ramanuja ddas shreekhetra, matha) marphat mandira parichalana kamiti, shree jagannath mandir, puri, ba - 117 298/ 122 Shree jagannath 0.033 0.033 Gharabari House 1400 Pranakrushna Self M 84 General Yes 38 mahaprabhu bije (sankha panda shreekhetra, chakra Biranchi panda Son M 35 General Yes marphat mandira matha) Premalata Daughte F 42 General Yes parichalana kamiti, Panda r in law shree jagannath Nurasingha Grand M 22 General Yes mandir, puri, ba - Panda Son 118 110 122/5 Shree jagannath 0.034 0.018 Gharabari Lodge 780 Nabakishore Self M 69 OBC No 64 mahaprabhu bije sahu shreekhetra, Bikram sahu Son M 39 OBC No marphat mandira Deepak kumar Son M 36 OBC No parichalana kamiti, sahu shree jagannath mandir, puri, ba - 119 298/ 286 Shree jagannath 0.050 0.047 Patita Shop 2000 Bishun mohan Self M 85 OBC No 35 mahaprabhu bije mallick shreekhetra, Gobind Self M 80 OBC No marphat mandira chandra mallick parichalana kamiti, Radha mohan Self M 70 OBC No shree jagannath mallik mandir, puri, ba - Akshay kumar Son M 55 OBC No mallick Sushanta Son M 40 OBC No

lxv

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) kumar mallick Jayadev mallik Grand M 25 OBC No son 120 298/ 287 Shree jagannath 0.083 0.078 Rasta Road 35 mahaprabhu bije shreekhetra, marphat mandira parichalana kamiti, shree jagannath mandir, puri, ba - 121 298/ 289 Shree jagannath 0.375 0.067 Gharabari Dolabedi 35 mahaprabhu bije shreekhetra, marphat mandira parichalana kamiti, shree jagannath mandir, puri, ba - 122 298/ 509 Shree jagannath 0.078 0.078 Gharabari Medical 35 mahaprabhu bije shreekhetra, marphat mandira parichalana kamiti, shree jagannath mandir, puri, ba – 123 159 541 Shree jagannath 0.133 0.133 Gharabari House & 2000 Mahanta shri Self M 38 General Yes mahaprabhu bije temple somanth puri shreekhetra, (languli marphat mandira matha) parichalana kamiti, shree jagannath mandir, puri, ba - 124 159 545 Shree jagannath 0.045 0.045 Gharabari House 1960 Mahanta sri Self M 52 General Yes mahaprabhu bije (Bada harinarayan shreekhetra, Akhada dash lxvi

lxviii

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) 131 133 124 Hajuri praphulla 0.005 0.005 Gharabari House 200 Already sold out khuntia, hajuri and bhima khuntia, lodge hajuri krushna chandra khuntia, hajuri rama narayan khuntia, hajuri rabi narayana khuntia, f- hajuri raghunath khuntia, ca- sevak brahmana, ba- harachandi sahi 132 315 130 Nisamani patra, h- 0.018 0.013 Gharabari House 500 Already sold out padma charana and patra, sakuntala shop patra, f- padma charana patra, ca- gola, ba- nijagaon, samili uttaradwara 133 111 132 Nabakishor sahu, f- 0.020 0.016 Gharabari House 690 Already sold out nilakantha sahu, bengabati sahu, h- nilakantha sahu, ca- teli, ba- nijagaon, samili banua hati 134 314 133 Nabakishor sahu, 0.023 0.016 Gharabari House 690 Already sold out naresh kumar sahu, f- nilakantha sahu, ca- gudia, ba- nijagaon 135 40 134 Shree gopalajiu 0.114 0.114 Gharabari House & 2000 Binapani dash Self F 64 General Yes mahaprabhu, bije lodge Srikanta dash Son M 43 General Yes gopala bhawana, (Gopal Srichandan Son M 34 General Yes lxix

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) nijagaon, marphat Bhaban) dash ba: krushna kumar ramanuja das, guru mahanta sankarshna ramanuja das, ca- baishnab, ba- nijagaon, samili trimali matha 136 6 135 Aruna kumar das, f- 0.025 0.025 Gharabari House 1000 Already sold out mahanta sankarshna ramanuja das, ca- brahmana, ba- nijagaon, samili banua hati 137 90 136 Harihara 0.016 0.016 Gharabari House 650 Already sold out mahapatra, fa- padmalava mahapatra, cast- sevak brahman, ba- baseli sahi 138 298/ 137 Antaryami pati, f- 0.0005 0.0005 Gharabari House 20 (No Physical Area) 4 janmajaya pati, ca- brahmana, ba- banua sahi 139 52 281 Mahanta ganga 0.011 0.011 Gharabari House 0 Mahanta ram Self M 62 General Yes das, guru mahanta (No bhusan das narayana das, ca- Area, Ram manohar Chela M 55 General Yes brahman baishnab, plot has das ba- sanachhata already matha, puri accuared during nabakale lxx

Sl. Khat Plot Name of the Total Land to Kisam Nature Area Project Relation Se Ag Social Loss of Loss Displ No. a no no person having ror affecte be of of affected with x e category other of aced d land acquire affected affect person head of of the assets other (yes (in d (in property ed the HHs family associa assets /no) acres) acres) (residen prope ted associ tial rty with ated house, (sq. affecte with lodge, Ft) d land affect shop, (specifi ed etc.) cation) land (quan tity) bar) 140 51 510 Mahanta ganga 0.087 0.087 Gharabari House 3700 Mahanta ram Self M 62 General Yes das, guru mahanta bhusan das narayana das, ca- Ram manohar Chela M 55 General Yes baishnab, ba- das sanachhata matha, puri 141 298/ 136/7 Aruna kumar ratha, 0.017 0.017 Gharabari- House 1246 (No Physical Area) 39 16 f- trilochana ratha, 1 ca- brahman, ba- karada, tha- dhamanagar ha, ba- chudanga sahi samili banua sahi gada 142 298/ 136/7 Kalandi prasad 0.017 0.017 Gharabari- House 740 Already sold out 40 17 ratha, f- trilochana 1 ratha, ca- brahmana, ba- karada, tha- dhamanagara ha, ba- chudanga sahi samili banua sahi, puri 143 298/ 137/7 Sabita dash, h- 0.0215 0.0215 Gharabari- House 930 Already sold out 48 23 aruna kumar dash, 1 ca- brahmana, ba- markandeswar sahi samili banua sahi, puri

lxxi

Note: - The entitelment matrix has been prepared on the basis of the respondent’s opinion during household survey for SIA undertaken as per the land details provided by NCDS and field level verification / observation. However, before the disbursement of funds under R & R / any other entitlements, further verification of the documents of entitlement holders should be done to recheck the validity.

lxxii